| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:16 pm Post subject: Battle of the 200s!! |
 |
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Well, I appear to have amassed a collection of 200mm primes!! So what better way to work off my Saturday night hangover than with a quick indoors flower test! 
All pictures are PP free (no sharpening!), although a couple have had their exposure tweaked. Note - everything looks a bit contrasty on my screen, I think Photoshop's been meddling with the pics when producing JPGs! I'm nore interested in IQ with this test though to be honest, focusing on the inside of the gerbera.
The contenders:
(From left to right)
1. Soligor 200/3.5 (Tokina with A/M switch)
2. Soligor 200/4.5 (Late pre-set Tokina I think)
3. Hanimex 200/4.5 (Early pre-set Tokina I think)
4. Pentacon 200/4 (Early pre-set model)
5. Photax 200/4.5 (Late pre-set something or other!!!)
And just for fun, I tested "old trusty" Tamron 103A 80-210/3.8-4 at 200mm as well 
First up, wide open:
Soligor 200/3.5
Crop
Soligor 200/4.5
Crop
Hanimex 200/4.5
Crop
Pentacon 200/4
Crop
Photax 200/4.5
Crop
Tamron 103A
Crop
And now for F5.6 shots:
Soligor 200/3.5
Crop
Soligor 200/4.5
Crop
Hanimex 200/4.5
Crop
Pentacon 200/4
Crop
Photax 200/4.5
Crop
Tamron 103A
Crop
And now for F8:
Soligor 200/3.5
Crop
Soligor 200/4.5
Crop
Hanimex 200/4.5
Crop
Pentacon 200/4
Crop
Photax 200/4.5
Crop
Tamron 103A
Crop
I know this isn't a proper test, as one subject (indoors) can never be enough, but hopefully it's of use to someone!!
To me, this test shows that any of these lenses can produce decent shots. My faves have to be the Soligor 200/3.5 and "old trusty" himself The biggest surprise for me was the Hanimex, superb for £4.00!
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 4809
Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
I too, was surprised with the Hanimex! The crop shows GREAT clarity, compared to the others! The Tamron takes the prize here, but all of them seem pretty close to each other in their "second place" roles.
It looks like, for my purposes, that just about any of them would be just fine. 
_________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Soligor 200/3,5 for me.
Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rob Leslie
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 1103
Location: UK Swindon
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rob Leslie wrote:
| Laurence wrote: |
I too, was surprised with the Hanimex! The crop shows GREAT clarity, compared to the others! The Tamron takes the prize here, but all of them seem pretty close to each other in their "second place" roles.
It looks like, for my purposes, that just about any of them would be just fine. |
Interesting that you think the Tamron 103A (A zoom) ‘Takes the prize.’
You should try the Tamron adaptall 2 f3.5 200mm prime 04B. I have used it for a number of years and yet to find anything better, sharp from wide open.
My other choices would also be Tamron zooms at 200mm, the 19AH and the SP 35-210 and the SP 60-300. I would also include the Super Takumar f4 200mm (M42) in the list though it can be prone to a little CA wide open.
_________________
Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user inc G5, GR2
http://robstreet.blogspot.com/
http://robleslie.blogspot.com/
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64956578@N00/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 4809
Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Hi Rob: Yes, I was rather surprised at the Tamron, in light of it being a zoom.
In the same breath, I have a great affinity towards the Tamron manufactured lenses. I respect your opinion, especially based on your overall photographic output. So on that note, I will find a Tamron 3.5/200 prime. I totally appreciate your input.
_________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 8551
Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Rats - a tamron 200/3.5 just sold on fealB yesterday for $23.50
patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6950
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
| estudleon wrote: |
Soligor 200/3,5 for me.
Rino. |
Yep, that look like a winner for me.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rob Leslie
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 1103
Location: UK Swindon
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rob Leslie wrote:
| Laurence wrote: |
Hi Rob: Yes, I was rather surprised at the Tamron, in light of it being a zoom.
In the same breath, I have a great affinity towards the Tamron manufactured lenses. I respect your opinion, especially based on your overall photographic output. So on that note, I will find a Tamron 3.5/200 prime. I totally appreciate your input. |
The Adaptall 2 f3.5 200mm often sells for little money as 200mm is such a common FL.
I would put it alongside SP lenses for quality, it wasn't an SP only because f3.5 200mm isn't anything special aperture or FL wise.
I do try not to be biased towards Tamrom lenses, but they have always made such good lenses. Even todays AF ones take a lot of beating. I have a few friends with the Tamron 55-200 AF and it is fantastic and just about unbelievable when you consider the price, same applies to their ultra wide Zoom and the LD Di 70-300.
I would love a Tam AF 200-500 but just can't warrant the cost vs use issue.
_________________
Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user inc G5, GR2
http://robstreet.blogspot.com/
http://robleslie.blogspot.com/
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64956578@N00/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
| martinsmith99 wrote: |
| estudleon wrote: |
Soligor 200/3,5 for me.
Rino. |
Yep, that look like a winner for me. |
And for me.
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 5078
Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Thanks gents !
I just got a soligor 200mm f3.5 for 16,50 €.
I'm quite happy after having seen these topic's pictures and reading your comments.
I have to wait for it now.
In fact, i received a super paragon 200mm f3.3 (which is very very close to a Chinon. I think it's the same) for free with a 135mm f2.8. Only problem : haze. I made some shots and they were quite overexposed. So i decided to try to clean it... and made it worse.
When i looked at the shots i took, i tried to make some post treatment in DPP... and discovered how sharp. So, as i loved the range, i decided to bid on this Soligor.
Just 3 pics from the super paragon i made worse 
_________________
Olivier - Moderator 
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Hi Oliver, the Photax in this test was actually branded Super Paragon, so possibly very similar? I'd say it performed the worst in this test anyway. You'll be far better off with the Soligor!
If anyone wants to make me an offer for the Soligor 200/4.5, please PM me for further info. It's in lovely condition and is a t-mount.
_________________
Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 5078
Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
| Shrek wrote: |
Hi Oliver, the Photax in this test was actually branded Super Paragon, so possibly very similar? I'd say it performed the worst in this test anyway. You'll be far better off with the Soligor!
If anyone wants to make me an offer for the Soligor 200/4.5, please PM me for further info. It's in lovely condition and is a t-mount. |
Thanks Shrek.
_________________
Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 837
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
I'm very impressed with the Hanimex as well! Much better than I would have expected (I would have guessed somewhere around Chinon).
Last edited by eeyore_nl on Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:55 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Today I saw again your test. It´s a marvelous test with greats lenses.
My prefer is the 3,5 soligor, but the other soligor is very good too (something cold, taste quid).
Pentacon has nice colors and good sharpness at F/8. At this aperture almost all given a good pics in the test.
In this "200 battle", I would like to see the lenses in test, giving the best thing of them in the battlefield (outdoor pics).
What do you think?
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
| estudleon wrote: |
Today I saw again your test. It´s a marvelous test with greats lenses.
My prefer is the 3,5 soligor, but the other soligor is very good too (something cold, taste quid).
Pentacon has nice colors and good sharpness at F/8. At this aperture almost all given a good pics in the test.
In this "200 battle", I would like to see the lenses in test, giving the best thing of them in the battlefield (outdoor pics).
What do you think? |
Hi Rino
Will try and do an outdoor test once the summer arrives! I've sold the Photax Paragon now, but I could still test the others I did a mini 135mm test indoors today as well with:
Soligor 135/3.5
Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135/3.5
Pentacon Electric 135/2.8
Pentacon pre-set 135/2.8
Auto Chinon 135/2.8
Helios 135/2.8
Auto Carenar 135/2.8
Will post the results next week hopefully
_________________
Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
| Shrek wrote: |
| estudleon wrote: |
Today I saw again your test. It´s a marvelous test with greats lenses.
My prefer is the 3,5 soligor, but the other soligor is very good too (something cold, taste quid).
Pentacon has nice colors and good sharpness at F/8. At this aperture almost all given a good pics in the test.
In this "200 battle", I would like to see the lenses in test, giving the best thing of them in the battlefield (outdoor pics).
What do you think? |
Hi Rino
Will try and do an outdoor test once the summer arrives! I've sold the Photax Paragon now, but I could still test the others I did a mini 135mm test indoors today as well with:
Soligor 135/3.5
Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135/3.5
Pentacon Electric 135/2.8
Pentacon pre-set 135/2.8
Auto Chinon 135/2.8
Helios 135/2.8
Auto Carenar 135/2.8
Will post the results next week hopefully |
Yes, please. Very goods 135's.
Sure your new test will be very informative and usefull too.
Tegatds. Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
