Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Just for fun Sonnar and Distagon comparison
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:22 pm    Post subject: Just for fun Sonnar and Distagon comparison Reply with quote

OK maybe this is silly but I am home alone for the day and bored silly.
This is from yesterday. I tried to match the composition and exposure the same.White balance is set at 5200 for both. Only a blackpoint and contrast adjustment.
The Sonnar 3.5/100 is the first one shot wide open
The Hollywood Distagon 2/28 at f4 next it is a crop maybe 30% so not major.
Both shot in the shade iso 400 sonnar 1/250th Hollywood 1/200th.
This Sonnar is an AE version. I think the best lens in the Contax line in terms of sharpness, rendering, Contrast. Maybe others have nicer bokeh....maybe no.
I love this lens.





Sonnar


Distagon


Last edited by F16SUNSHINE on Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:05 am; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nice test sunshine
it clearly show why the distagon is so famous; colors, 3d, ...
now if you focused better, we could also seen about the resolution Razz


PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing Laughing

Mia Culpa Embarassed

I changed it for you Poilu.
The new image is the frame I intended to post.
Your right the first one posted was a miss focus.
This one is a bit better for sure Wink


PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I prefer the sonnar. Better details, better bokeh.


PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

horvlas wrote:
I prefer the sonnar. Better details, better bokeh.

+1 Agree with horvlas.


PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

horvlas wrote:
I prefer the sonnar. Better details, better bokeh.


+1


PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excuse my ignorance, but Why Hollywood?

I read it sometimes and always Question Question Embarassed


PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In this forum they know

http://forum.manualfocus.org/viewtopic.php?id=13791