Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Pentacon 1.8/50 lens?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:38 pm    Post subject: Pentacon 1.8/50 lens? Reply with quote

Did Chinon ever sell a 1.8/50 lens? I read about the f/1.7 and f/1.9 50mm lenses, but nothing about the f/1.8.

Would it be worth $10 plus a one hour drive to pick it up, or would it probably be a below-average lens?

Thanks in advance!

(later it turned out that it was a Pentacon 1.8/50)


Last edited by eeyore_nl on Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:15 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't know if chinon made a 1.8.
just discovered i seem to have a 1.4 and i like it. Usually 10 euro for a 1.8 is okay. but i personally wouldn't spend an hour drive for it.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

paguru wrote:
Well there is this lens: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=5632 - it's labelled Revuenon, but it might have been made by Chinon.

I have that one, and it's one of my weakest lenses - not worth the effort.


It turns out that the 50mm is a Pentacon ... but for that $10, he also throws a Chinon 135mm in the package.

Makes it more tempting, even if the Pentacon probably isn't worth the drive.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I never seen bad 50mm lens and also never seen bad lens from Chinon. They didn't make superb lenses but never made bad ones either.

You can buy extremely good 50mm lenses from many vendor on low prices.
Like Carl Zeiss, Nikon etc. I pay 100 USD for a Carl Zeiss lens instead of 10 USD for a third party lens. 10 USD lens can be ok, so-so , but never WOW like first class vendors.


PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eeyore_nl wrote:

It turns out that the 50mm is a Pentacon ... but for that $10, he also throws a Chinon 135mm in the package.

Makes it more tempting, even if the Pentacon probably isn't worth the drive.


Well, I decided to pick up both lenses for $10 anyway, since I was in the neightbourhood. They both look clean, and seem to work properly. I haven't tried the 135mm yet, but here is a first shot with the Pentacon 1.8/50 (unfortunately in low light at iso800):



Very nice that the minimum focus distance is only 33cm Smile

(contrast was adjusted in Gimp, picture shot at iso800, in Landscape mode on a Canon 30D).


Not bad for a $5 lens Wink


PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really like my Chinon 135:



Mechanically it's well built, comes with a sliding lens hood, and although the bokeh isn't anything special it's certainly capable of taking nice pictures. It was thrown in with a CZJ Tessar for an extra $15, so I can't complain about the price, even if it was three times more expensive than your copy Smile


PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't underestimate Pentacon 50/1.8. Very Happy

Here is Prakticar 50/1.8 (third model), same as Pentacon 50/1.8 which
was originally "Oreston 50/1.8" with a possibly better coating.




PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 4:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

close focus at 0.33m?

sounds like a Pancolar!

isn't the Pentacon a re-badged Pancolar? if so then that's quite a bargain at $10...


PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 6:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

orly_andico wrote:
close focus at 0.33m?

sounds like a Pancolar!

isn't the Pentacon a re-badged Pancolar? if so then that's quite a bargain at $10...


$5 Smile

No, as far as I know it's a Meyer Oreston design.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 6:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A good lens , but not Pancolar that for sure.Pancolar even better.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eeyore_nl wrote:

Very nice that the minimum focus distance is only 33cm Smile


The Canon EF 50/1.8 is a bit sharper (wide open) and has more contrast. But the shortest focus distance is only 45cm, and the out of focus areas are more harsh. So the Pentacon is a nice addition for close-up pictures (not real macro of course).

About the Chinon 135; my "aus Jena" Sonnar 135mm is definitely better!


PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

eeyore_nl wrote:
eeyore_nl wrote:

Very nice that the minimum focus distance is only 33cm Smile


The Canon EF 50/1.8 is a bit sharper (wide open) and has more contrast. But the shortest focus distance is only 45cm, and the out of focus areas are more harsh. So the Pentacon is a nice addition for close-up pictures (not real macro of course).

About the Chinon 135; my "aus Jena" Sonnar 135mm is definitely better!


Your actually comparing a Zeiss to a Chinon ? Shame on you! Shocked Razz Very Happy


PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

spiralcity wrote:
eeyore_nl wrote:
eeyore_nl wrote:

Very nice that the minimum focus distance is only 33cm Smile


The Canon EF 50/1.8 is a bit sharper (wide open) and has more contrast. But the shortest focus distance is only 45cm, and the out of focus areas are more harsh. So the Pentacon is a nice addition for close-up pictures (not real macro of course).

About the Chinon 135; my "aus Jena" Sonnar 135mm is definitely better!


Your actually comparing a Zeiss to a Chinon ? Shame on you! Shocked Razz Very Happy



Laughing

Try some Chinon, they are not reach Zeiss but very close to it.


PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
spiralcity wrote:
eeyore_nl wrote:
eeyore_nl wrote:

Very nice that the minimum focus distance is only 33cm Smile


The Canon EF 50/1.8 is a bit sharper (wide open) and has more contrast. But the shortest focus distance is only 45cm, and the out of focus areas are more harsh. So the Pentacon is a nice addition for close-up pictures (not real macro of course).

About the Chinon 135; my "aus Jena" Sonnar 135mm is definitely better!


Your actually comparing a Zeiss to a Chinon ? Shame on you! Shocked Razz Very Happy



Laughing

Try some Chinon, they are not reach Zeiss but very close to it.


Hi Attila,
I own a bunch of Chinon and Chinar glass. I truly dont find it to be quite as good as Zeiss or even Nikon.
I like my Chinon glass and I collect Chinon camera's but I wouldnt compare the glass to Zeiss.
Just my opinion. Very Happy


PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you have right in this case, I tested only 135mm Chinon lens and perhaps one more both were pretty good close to Carl Zeiss Jena.


PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I read from local MF forum. Somebody had open up around 10 Pentacon 1.8/50mm, and, found them have different structure from Meyer 1.8/50mm. So, it was not a re-badged Meyer as listed.


PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I picked up a pentacon auto f1.8/50 Multi coated in A1 condition attached to a Praktica MTL 3 at a boot sale a few weeks ago.

I tried a few shoots at f5.6 with it and was surprised how good they were. I haven't had time to try the lens properly and see what it is like at wider apertures so can’t say it is very good or not. I expect it will be a while before I do. You do have to have a lot of bad luck to find a 50mm lens which isn't any good when stopped down to f5.6 or so. perhaps the best of the Car boot bargains is the cute little Industar.
The price £1. inc camera which I have now thrown away. I offered it for free but nobody even wanted to pay the postage.
The Pentacon f1.8 50mm is a very common lens which can often be found at Boot sales, charity shops etc for next to nothing. Every week I see a Helios, Industar, Lydith or Pentacon for a £1 or 2.