MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
DiskFreeVault safely moves Mac apps and data to external storage.
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

Scanned film
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Reply

I noted that to scanner, there aren't differences between the reversible

and the negative films. In the case, provia F and superia reala.

Is it truth or I'm wrong?

Rino


Reply

I see significant difference on slide and negative don't know this is scanning difference or input source difference. I guess rather slides are better than film.


Reply

I too, have noticed a significant difference between slide (Sensia 100) and
Reala 100 when scanning. I wish I could shoot nothing but Sensia, or perhaps Provia, as well. I use Epson 4490.


Reply

what kind of difference ?


Reply

sensia

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/filmcamera/Olympusom2n_sensia/Fuji_sensia_Olmpus_om2n_olympus_om_21-021.jpg.html

dm paradise film

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/filmcamera/Olympusom2n/Olympus_OM2n_Om18_Om_21mg157.jpg.html

Fuji or Agfa film
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/filmcamera/nikon_fA/Nikon_FA-28.jpg.html


Reply

[quote="poilu"]what kind of difference ?[/quote]

I used Provia F. When I saw this shots using lupe 30X directly, I

could see some detail that I can't see looking this scanned shots at the

monitor of my PC.

When I saw the shots in superia film, scanned, at the monitor of my PC

I don't see differences (in sharpness, contrast) between this shots and the

others shots in Provia F showed in the monitor.


Rino.