View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
montecarlo
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1865 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:34 pm Post subject: DOF |
|
|
montecarlo wrote:
Hello all.
Maybe this is a well debated issue but I think I didnt' understand how DOF works. I thought DOF is related to the focal lenght and aperture only and not sensor/film format. I would say that using a 80mm lens on a 35mm camera, a APS-C camera and a 6x6 camera would give the same DOF . Only the view angle would be different.
How come then when using this calculator http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/depth-of-field.htm
the resulted values for a 80mm lens at f:4 and a subject at 5 meters are:
-for APS-C 1.5 crop sensor: 0.68m
-for 35mm FF: 1.025m
-for 6x6 : 1.91m
Shouldn't be the same value ?
Thanks everyone. _________________ Canonet QL17 III
Zenit E , Helios-44 58mm f:2.0 , Tair-11A 135mm f:2.8, Jupiter-9 85mm f:2.0,
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm f:2.4
Pentax MX, ME Super, Chinon CE4/CM4, Petri MC 28mm f:2, smc Pentax-M 50mm f:1.7, Soligor T 135mm f:2.8
Minolta X500, Tokina 28/2.8, Rokkor 50/1.7, 80-205/4.5
Nikon D90, Nikkor 35/2.0, Nikkor 50/1.8, Sigma 24/2.8, Nikkor 18-105 VR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Yeah, I have some problems with this stuff also.
I've settled on this image: start with a large view camera, everything is large: the lens, the film, the 'lines per mm'. If you need to photograph a comb, the whole thing covers, say, 5 cm on the film. Doesn't need a lot of lpm to get the whole thing.
Then start miniaturizing: everything gets smaller: lens, film, the requirement for lpm. That same comb now has to fit onto, say, 1 cm on the film. You have to resolve much finer detail.
And so on, every time you get smaller, everything gets smaller.
Including the circle of confusion, which gives us the sensation of DOF. (Also, I believe, the onset of diffraction becomes earlier, as the physical stuff miniaturizes but light itself does not.) _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard_D
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2378 Location: Faversham Kent UK
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Richard_D wrote:
Nesster wrote: |
Yeah, I have some problems with this stuff also.
I've settled on this image: start with a large view camera, everything is large: the lens, the film, the 'lines per mm'. If you need to photograph a comb, the whole thing covers, say, 5 cm on the film. Doesn't need a lot of lpm to get the whole thing.
Then start miniaturizing: everything gets smaller: lens, film, the requirement for lpm. That same comb now has to fit onto, say, 1 cm on the film. You have to resolve much finer detail.
And so on, every time you get smaller, everything gets smaller.
Including the circle of confusion, which gives us the sensation of DOF. (Also, I believe, the onset of diffraction becomes earlier, as the physical stuff miniaturizes but light itself does not.) |
Sounds about right - switching to full frame from aps-c has reduced dof but increased the maximum useable aperture before diffraction starts softening... _________________ Richard
The interesting bit:
Nikkors: 20mm f2.8 AIS, 24mm f2.8 AIS, 28mm f2.8 AIS, 35mm f2 AIS, 50mm f1.4 AI, 50mm f1.48AI, 50m f2 AI,
55mm f3.5 AI'd, 105mm f4 AI, 135mm f2.8 AI'd, 135mm f3.5 AI'd, 200mm f4 AI'd .
Nikon E Series: 100mm f2.8 .
Soviet Nikon Mount: Zenitar 16mm f2.8, Arsat/arax/photex 85mm T&S f2.8 .
Other: Asahi Super Takumar 55 mm f2 (M42) ,Tamron 300mm f5.6 SP, Tamron 500mm f8 SP.
DSLR: Nikon D700. 35mm SLRsNikon FE, Pentax S1a.
TLR: Rolliecord II.
Sub-Minature: Pentax Auto 110, 18mm f2.8, 24mm f2.8, 50mm f2.8.
More to come... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
montecarlo
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1865 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
montecarlo wrote:
But, but, but... is you use CZJ Biometar 80m f:2.8 at set at f:4 and focus on a objec placed at 5 meters, mounted on Pentaxon Six, Canon 5D and Canon 400D the DOF won't be the same ?
Or only if the calculations are made for a lens desing for a specific format only than the resulted DOF valued will be different ? _________________ Canonet QL17 III
Zenit E , Helios-44 58mm f:2.0 , Tair-11A 135mm f:2.8, Jupiter-9 85mm f:2.0,
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm f:2.4
Pentax MX, ME Super, Chinon CE4/CM4, Petri MC 28mm f:2, smc Pentax-M 50mm f:1.7, Soligor T 135mm f:2.8
Minolta X500, Tokina 28/2.8, Rokkor 50/1.7, 80-205/4.5
Nikon D90, Nikkor 35/2.0, Nikkor 50/1.8, Sigma 24/2.8, Nikkor 18-105 VR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
A G Photography
Joined: 11 May 2008 Posts: 1480 Location: Bologna - Italy
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A G Photography wrote:
As Nesster said it is related to the circle of confusion size.
Actually for each lens, whatever the focal and the aperture, there's just ONE point of exact focus. All the others are approsimations which seems in focus or not depending on the circle of confusion size for that film or sensor size.
Here there are the circle fo confusion size for every film and sensor formats:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_of_confusion _________________ Alessandro
My Photography Website
My Blog about Photography and Italian Cuisine
My Photostream on Flickr
--------------------------------------------------------
DSLR: Nikon d80, Olympus e410
SLR: Chinon CX, Fujica ST605n, Nikon f601, Pentacon FM, Pentax Spotmatic SPII, Praktica FX, Praktica FX2, Voigtlander VST1, Yashica FX-3, Zeiss Contaflex
RF: Altissa Altix, Zorki Ie, Kiev 4b
Medium Format: Pentacon Six TL, Zeiss Ikonta 520/2, Mockba 4, Voigtlander Bessa I, Agfa Isolette II, Agfa Isola
Large Format: Cambo SC 4x5, Rodenstock Sinaron 150/5.6, Rodenstock Rodagon 150/5.6, Schneider Kreuznach Symmar 180/5.6
Lenses
Nikkors: 28/3.5 AIS, 35/2, 50/1.8, 50/2 H, Micro 55/3.5, Micro 60/2.8, 85/1.8, 135/3.5 AI, 200/4 NAI, 18-55/3.5-5.6, 28-80/3.5-5.6, 55-200/4-5.6
CY: Distagon 28/2.8, Planar 50/1.4, Yashika 50/1.7, Sonnar 135/2.8
CZJ m42-Exakta: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Tessar 40/4.5, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Pancolar 50/2, Biotar 58/2, Biotar 75/1.5, Tessar 80/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 135/4, Triotar 135/4
CZJ P6: Flektogon 50/4, Flektogon 65/2.8, Biometar 80/2.8, Biometar 120/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer-Pentacon: Orestegon 29/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Lydith 30/3.5, Primagon 35/4.5, Helioplan 40/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Primotar 50/3.5, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Orestor 100/2.8, Trioplan 100/2.8, Helioplan 135/4.5, Orestor 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5, Primotar 180/3.5, Telemegor 180/5.5, Orestegor 200/4, Pentacon 200/4, Orestegor 300/4, Telemegor 300/4.5, Telemegor 400/5.5
Schneider-Kreuznach: Curtagon 28/4, Curtagon 35/2.8, Xenon 50/1.9, Xenar 50/2.8, Tele Xenar 135/3.5, Tele Xenar 200/4
Russians: Arsat Zodiak 30/3.5, Mir-I 37/2.8, Volna-9 50/2.8, Industar-50 50/3.5, Industar-61 50/2.8, Helios 44 58/2, Helios 44-2 58/2, Helios 44-M-4 58/2, Volna-3 80/2.8, Helios 40 85/1.5, Jupiter 9 85/2, Jupiter 11 135/4
Others: Chinon-Tomioka 55/1.4, Helios 28/2.8, Isco Iscotar 50/2.8, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Ludwig Meritar 50/2.9, Schacht Travegon 35/3.5, Schacht Travenon 135/4.5, Sekor 55/1.8, Sigma MF 28/2.8, S-Takumar, 28/3.5, S-Takumar 50/1.4, S-Takumar 55/1.8, S-Takumar 55/2, Steinheil Quinar 135/2.8, Steinheil Culminar 135/4.5, Vivitar 135/2.8, Voigtlander Ultron 50/1.8, Yashica Yashinon DX 50/1.4, Zuiko MC Auto-W 28/2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rob Leslie
Joined: 20 Mar 2007 Posts: 1103 Location: UK Swindon
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rob Leslie wrote:
DOF is all about subject to lens distance. In theory all lenses have the same DOF if the subject image size remains the same, then at any given aperture all lenses will give the same depth of field. But we shoot at different distances with wide angle, telephoto and different DSLR crop factors.
Here is link to an article explaining it.
http://luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dof2.shtml
Once you understand all lenses do have the same DOF and forget the myths about wide angle having more than telephoto things become very easy. _________________ Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user inc G5, GR2
http://robstreet.blogspot.com/
http://robleslie.blogspot.com/
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64956578@N00/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
I read the articles but I'm still confused. In Cosmin's example I can see there will be a different circle of confusion with the P6 compared to the Canons because of the different flange to film distance. But the two Canons have the same distance. If they both use the same lens and aperture setting and focus on the same object, how can the image be any different? The APS-C sensor image is just a crop of the FF. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
I think you're right IF you take the view that the same distances apply, only the crop is different.
OTH, if you keep the subject with the same coverage in the image area, which is reasonable, as with 35mm you'd want to fill the frame and with crop cam's you'd also not want to cut parts of the subject off, then all the dof / resolution matters come into play.
Of course, I could be entirely wrong about this, I can't wrap my head around the whole theory of it, so I just shoot _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
A G Photography
Joined: 11 May 2008 Posts: 1480 Location: Bologna - Italy
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A G Photography wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
I read the articles but I'm still confused. In Cosmin's example I can see there will be a different circle of confusion with the P6 compared to the Canons because of the different flange to film distance. But the two Canons have the same distance. If they both use the same lens and aperture setting and focus on the same object, how can the image be any different? The APS-C sensor image is just a crop of the FF. |
It's very very simple Peter. Toss away all the theory, get a large image with some progressive out of focus areas, resize it down and you'll see that some of the once out of focus areas will now seem in focus to your eyes. That's the effect of the circle of confusion depending on the size of the image (film or sensor). _________________ Alessandro
My Photography Website
My Blog about Photography and Italian Cuisine
My Photostream on Flickr
--------------------------------------------------------
DSLR: Nikon d80, Olympus e410
SLR: Chinon CX, Fujica ST605n, Nikon f601, Pentacon FM, Pentax Spotmatic SPII, Praktica FX, Praktica FX2, Voigtlander VST1, Yashica FX-3, Zeiss Contaflex
RF: Altissa Altix, Zorki Ie, Kiev 4b
Medium Format: Pentacon Six TL, Zeiss Ikonta 520/2, Mockba 4, Voigtlander Bessa I, Agfa Isolette II, Agfa Isola
Large Format: Cambo SC 4x5, Rodenstock Sinaron 150/5.6, Rodenstock Rodagon 150/5.6, Schneider Kreuznach Symmar 180/5.6
Lenses
Nikkors: 28/3.5 AIS, 35/2, 50/1.8, 50/2 H, Micro 55/3.5, Micro 60/2.8, 85/1.8, 135/3.5 AI, 200/4 NAI, 18-55/3.5-5.6, 28-80/3.5-5.6, 55-200/4-5.6
CY: Distagon 28/2.8, Planar 50/1.4, Yashika 50/1.7, Sonnar 135/2.8
CZJ m42-Exakta: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Tessar 40/4.5, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Pancolar 50/2, Biotar 58/2, Biotar 75/1.5, Tessar 80/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 135/4, Triotar 135/4
CZJ P6: Flektogon 50/4, Flektogon 65/2.8, Biometar 80/2.8, Biometar 120/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer-Pentacon: Orestegon 29/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Lydith 30/3.5, Primagon 35/4.5, Helioplan 40/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Primotar 50/3.5, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Orestor 100/2.8, Trioplan 100/2.8, Helioplan 135/4.5, Orestor 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5, Primotar 180/3.5, Telemegor 180/5.5, Orestegor 200/4, Pentacon 200/4, Orestegor 300/4, Telemegor 300/4.5, Telemegor 400/5.5
Schneider-Kreuznach: Curtagon 28/4, Curtagon 35/2.8, Xenon 50/1.9, Xenar 50/2.8, Tele Xenar 135/3.5, Tele Xenar 200/4
Russians: Arsat Zodiak 30/3.5, Mir-I 37/2.8, Volna-9 50/2.8, Industar-50 50/3.5, Industar-61 50/2.8, Helios 44 58/2, Helios 44-2 58/2, Helios 44-M-4 58/2, Volna-3 80/2.8, Helios 40 85/1.5, Jupiter 9 85/2, Jupiter 11 135/4
Others: Chinon-Tomioka 55/1.4, Helios 28/2.8, Isco Iscotar 50/2.8, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Ludwig Meritar 50/2.9, Schacht Travegon 35/3.5, Schacht Travenon 135/4.5, Sekor 55/1.8, Sigma MF 28/2.8, S-Takumar, 28/3.5, S-Takumar 50/1.4, S-Takumar 55/1.8, S-Takumar 55/2, Steinheil Quinar 135/2.8, Steinheil Culminar 135/4.5, Vivitar 135/2.8, Voigtlander Ultron 50/1.8, Yashica Yashinon DX 50/1.4, Zuiko MC Auto-W 28/2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Nesster wrote: |
OTH, if you keep the subject with the same coverage in the image area, which is reasonable, as with 35mm you'd want to fill the frame and with crop cam's you'd also not want to cut parts of the subject off, then all the dof / resolution matters come into play. |
You're right, but that's a different situation to what Cosmin asked. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|