| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
alex ph
 Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1802
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2023 3:30 pm Post subject: Isco Kiptaron 1.8/75 repair |
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2023 3:30 pm Post subject: Isco Kiptaron 1.8/75 repair |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
I've got a 16mm projection Kiptaron 1.8/75 with an idea to use it on APS-C without much of vignetting. Unfortunately when the lens came in a lot, the inner glass was rattling inside, making the lens unusable. When I unscrewed the rear glass to take the middle off, the front lens fall off too. Visibly, it was not fixed and was just in its destined place, "fixed" by a good fit of its shape to the barrel.
This way I discovered three glass elements which compose together something that looks pretty much like a triplet: a bold bi-convex front, an asymmetrical bi-concave middle and a convex rear.
#1
As the front and the rear glass have their fixed positions inside the barrel, the most problematic is the position of the mid element. And here I have no idea at which distance it was originally put into. Just because the barrel is straight inside, and the mid element shifts down freely until it touches the up surface of the washer retaining the rear element.
#2
Was there a spacer and someone took it off, or was the original composition fixed in another way, ot maybe there were four elements, and one more is missing together with the spacers? I am asking some help or hints, as I could not find an available optical scheme which could answer to this question.
To test different configurations myself, I put a very thin layer of adhesive on the side of the mid glass which let me temporarily (and not very strongly) fix the glass inside the barrel. Moving the glass inside, I tried various positions of it within the reassembled triplet. Nothing worked. At some point there is a very fuzzy image that does not recall by far an OK projection quality. But in many other positions (the mid element very close to the rear one or pretty much to the front) there is just "milk" on the screen. Paradoxically, the reversed lens gives a bit more of shapes than the lens directed correctly. But if I flip the mid element, this does not help either.
#3
So, my question is if someone has bits of documentation on Kiptarons or maybe practical knowledge how to repair the issue and reassemble the troublesome lens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calvin83
 Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7740 Location: Hong Kong
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2023 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2023 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
IF the lens is Petzval type, take a look at there if you can't find further info.
http://forum.mflenses.com/roger-cicala-tests-lomographys-petzval-lens-t67138.html#1397448 _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alex ph
 Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1802
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you very much, Calvin! I'll study this thread. Even if I am a bit lost in specs: Kiptaron looks more a triplet than Petzval scheme. But I'll read more attentively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calvin83
 Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7740 Location: Hong Kong
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
A triplet will have similar size elements. Typical fast etzval projection for 16mm film will have big front element and small rear element. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alex ph
 Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1802
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you for the clarification! Now is just to understand what to do with the third, rattling element. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calvin83
 Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7740 Location: Hong Kong
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Someone who owns the lens should be able to check it for you if your lens is complete. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alex ph
 Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1802
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2023 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Hope to get an owner's hint! Thanks again for your friendly attention. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
simple.joy
 Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 944
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 4:13 pm Post subject: Re: Isco Kiptaron 1.8/75 repair |
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 4:13 pm Post subject: Re: Isco Kiptaron 1.8/75 repair |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
| alex ph wrote: |
I've got a 16mm projection Kiptaron 1.8/75 with an idea to use it on APS-C without much of vignetting. Unfortunately when the lens came in a lot, the inner glass was rattling inside, making the lens unusable. When I unscrewed the rear glass to take the middle off, the front lens fall off too. Visibly, it was not fixed and was just in its destined place, "fixed" by a good fit of its shape to the barrel.
This way I discovered three glass elements which compose together something that looks pretty much like a triplet: a bold bi-convex front, an asymmetrical bi-concave middle and a convex rear.
To test different configurations myself, I put a very thin layer of adhesive on the side of the mid glass which let me temporarily (and not very strongly) fix the glass inside the barrel. Moving the glass inside, I tried various positions of it within the reassembled triplet. Nothing worked. At some point there is a very fuzzy image that does not recall by far an OK projection quality. But in many other positions (the mid element very close to the rear one or pretty much to the front) there is just "milk" on the screen. Paradoxically, the reversed lens gives a bit more of shapes than the lens directed correctly. But if I flip the mid element, this does not help either.
#3
So, my question is if someone has bits of documentation on Kiptarons or maybe practical knowledge how to repair the issue and reassemble the troublesome lens. |
I know this thread is very old, so perhaps you found a solution already... I don't have this specific lens, but a shorter Kiptaron 50 mm f/1.3 and it does have an interesting lens design. My suspicion is, that it's a 5 elements in 4 groups design. This is my guess, though I haven't checked all of the lenses separately, so take it with a big grain of salt:
I'm pretty sure there are at least 5 elements in there. Of course your longer lens could have a different design, but is it possible that you're missing an element? Or that there are doublets among the three parts?
There's also an old thread on the 75 mm f/1.7 so perhaps Attila knows something more about that lens:
https://forum.mflenses.com/kiptaron-75mm-f1-7-isco-on-sony-a7r-36mp-t73467,highlight,%2Bkiptaron.html _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|