| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Räbenfluch
 Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 112
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:04 pm Post subject: Well, that did not worked as planned... |
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:04 pm Post subject: Well, that did not worked as planned... |
|
|
Räbenfluch wrote:
Well first off I got 15 Frames on one 120 film. Hey, Pentacon Six, you did well haha
And my negative Carrier did not clear completly. What can I do about that, and what was the fault?
Then, the negatives came out really light, so I guess my developingtime was too short.
It was Tmax 400+2 in Tetenal Ultrafin, 1+20 for 16 minutes.
I will upload some scans tommorow, because the film is drying atm.
Okay, until then
Timo  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
berraneck
 Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
get the camera serviced or buy some working one;)
I think you underdeveloped the negative - tmax400 push+2 in ultrafin 1+10 should be around 21min@20°C
http://infomagazin.phototec.de/infomag_erechner.php _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Räbenfluch
 Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 112
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Räbenfluch wrote:
But the Massive Devchart said, for Tmax-Films for a +2 push time*1.33
http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?doc=pushproc
See?
I was wondering, what was right then :/
And my other Pentacon body does not have any problems with the filmadvance
Ah, I guess I have to accept it, as second film :/
At least there are Pics on it
I will try to refix it to clear the base tommorow, when it is completly dry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Räbenfluch
 Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 112
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Räbenfluch wrote:
I think that i found one of my mistakes:
I took the fixing-time for a normal film from the bottle tetenal superfix....
It's for minutes and I think Tmax needs like 10 or something in this range right?
Damn, this film is pulling me down!
Timo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
berraneck
 Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
non-standard processing is always tricky, consider it that you made a test for next time;) but it needs to be said, that you shouldn´t judge too much from negative - it depends how the film will perform in enlarger. some of my friends say, that properly developed film allows to read newspaper through it:)
just a quick tip: if you´re unsure about developing time (especially when push-processing), don´t be shy to use longest time you find on the internet. underdeveloped/underxposed film is much bigger problem than overdeveloped/overexposed. _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Räbenfluch
 Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 112
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Räbenfluch wrote:
I got some more Tmax 400@1600 laying around, I will try the 20Minutes next I think.
Thanks for the advises, Berraneck,
I'm sure the next one will be better!
Regards, Timo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
berraneck
 Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
good luck;) _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|