View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tikkathree
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 755 Location: Lovely Suffolk in Great Britain
Expire: 2012-12-28
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:10 pm Post subject: So, scanners then, what's all that about? |
|
|
tikkathree wrote:
Okay so let's assume that my exploratory forays into 35mm film photography go well and possibly - in the fullness of time - lead to an MF camera coming to live with me.
I then have a situation of wanting to deal with 35mm and possibly MF negatives.
I'm told that scanning my developed negs is the best way to get them onto my computer for processing.
I have a combined copier/scanner now: a little desktop Lexmark, will that do the job?
Assuming not, what's involved? Do I assume that the little scanners often shown in adverts in the Sunday papers "save your old film negatives to your computer" aren't quite up to the job and that I need some kind of dedicated film negative scanner? _________________ I used to think digital was fun but then I discovered film, then I found old lenses and then, eventually I found rangefinders.
EOS 5DII, loadsalenses
Canon G9 IR conv,
MF: TLR, 645 and folders
35mm: Oly OM Pro bodies 1, 2, 3 and 4; Soviet RF kit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
You need flat bed scanner with film holder or dedicated scanner or a slide copier set with digital camera.
Others what did you mention not works.
A used flat bad scanner with film holder an inexpensive option and works pretty well.
Like Epson V500 or older models. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10953 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Much has already been written in the forum about scanners, such as can be found here.
I have Epson V500. Been very pleased with it, both for 35mm and 6x7 slides and negatives. V500 35mm scans are imho better than service standard scans, but not as good as more expensive high-rez scans from service. V500 6x7 scans are much better than service standard scans. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tikkathree
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 755 Location: Lovely Suffolk in Great Britain
Expire: 2012-12-28
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tikkathree wrote:
Attila wrote: |
You need flat bed scanner with film holder or dedicated scanner or a slide copier set with digital camera.
Others what did you mention not works.
A used flat bad scanner with film holder an inexpensive option and works pretty well.
Like Epson V500 or older models. |
Thanks Attila for your input. Clearly I have some reading to do. _________________ I used to think digital was fun but then I discovered film, then I found old lenses and then, eventually I found rangefinders.
EOS 5DII, loadsalenses
Canon G9 IR conv,
MF: TLR, 645 and folders
35mm: Oly OM Pro bodies 1, 2, 3 and 4; Soviet RF kit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tikkathree
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 755 Location: Lovely Suffolk in Great Britain
Expire: 2012-12-28
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tikkathree wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Much has already been written in the forum about scanners, |
Which is why this is such a great place to get help.
visualopsins wrote: |
such as can be found here.
I have Epson V500. Been very pleased with it, both for 35mm and 6x7 slides and negatives. V500 35mm scans are imho better than service standard scans, but not as good as more expensive high-rez scans from service. V500 6x7 scans are much better than service standard scans. |
Thank you. A search of "scanner" brings up 80 results!! I'm working my way through them and hope to be able to understand everything that's written.
By the way, do you prefer slide negatives or print negatives? I've been advised that the former may be preferable. I'm reading one search result which describes copying the 35mm by taking a photo of it with a DSLR: hmm, that's an interesting mix of technology _________________ I used to think digital was fun but then I discovered film, then I found old lenses and then, eventually I found rangefinders.
EOS 5DII, loadsalenses
Canon G9 IR conv,
MF: TLR, 645 and folders
35mm: Oly OM Pro bodies 1, 2, 3 and 4; Soviet RF kit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Slide or print film matter of your budget and targeted subject.
slide film purchase price , developing cost usually at least double than print film.
At long distance shoot, cityscape,landscape slide without doubt
portrait, rocks, bulidings , closer distance , car , machine etc print film same fine than slide,
to macro I prefer digital. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1888 Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
tikkathree wrote: |
I'm reading one search result which describes copying the 35mm by taking a photo of it with a DSLR: hmm, that's an interesting mix of technology |
It sounds strange at first, but it actually can produce very good results. Depending on the DSLR, it is quite possible to beat the flatbeds in image quality, and when you get things all set up, it can be faster as well! _________________ Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|