View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
You can find an explaination here (use google translate if needed) : http://piskunoff.blogspot.com/2017/03/blog-post.html _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alex TG
Joined: 13 Oct 2019 Posts: 221 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alex TG wrote:
cbass wrote: |
Does anyone know what this means?
Color Formula
|
Just the incorrect translation for what is called "color contribution index" (CCI) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbass
Joined: 27 Jul 2019 Posts: 450
|
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cbass wrote:
Thanks. I have a better understanding now, but I still have no reference.
I see two splits above: 10-0-1.5 and 11-0-0
How would the colors be different between 10-0-1.5 and 11-0-0?
The article calls 11-0-0 a rational fall and 11-0-1.5 almost perfect.
The post also says (translated): "However, the "golden mean" is a lot of lens optics of the old school without MC enlightenment."
Does that mean the single coated optics have better color? What is the golden mean? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
No, single coated lenses don't have better colour.
Golden mean: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_mean_(philosophy)
Quote: |
"the golden mean or golden middle way is the desirable middle between two extremes, one of excess and the other of deficiency." |
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Indigo82
Joined: 30 Dec 2018 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2020 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indigo82 wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Can someone please help me by giving me an advice?
I can obtain these two Helios lenses. I need you to tell me what are differences between them. Are coatings different maybe?
The first one is Helios 44 Zebra (https://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/helios-44-58mm-f2.html) and from physical construction point of view it looks the same as Helios 44-2 (https://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/kmz-helios-44-2-58mm-f-2.html). They both have 8 blade aperture.
Should I be worried about something specifically when choosing between the two? Or perhaps they are mostly the same and nothing to worry about.
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alex TG
Joined: 13 Oct 2019 Posts: 221 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2020 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alex TG wrote:
Zebra Helios-44 may have either Zenit SLR M39 or M42 mount - check before buying, as most of them are actually M39.
Helios-44-2 is always M42. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thanosss7
Joined: 26 Nov 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2020 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanosss7 wrote:
Hello to everyone here! I've been reading through this thread for some months and it was very helpful, while i was trying to make a choice in which model of Helios i would buy!
After a lot of search,about a month ago i bought from the same seller 2 Helios 44,one of 8 blades and one of 13 and both are 39 mount and with the bluish coating.
Finally today they both arrived!!! Fortunately they seem in very good condition,as was described!
I have a question about the year of manufacture... in the 44-2 etc lenses it's not that complicated,but in the 44, i can't say i really understood what is going on, even if i read many times post here...
If someone of you can help me figure it out, it would be very kind! Not that it's important the year it was made,but just out of curiosity!
The No0296567 is the 8 blades and the No0174401 is the 13 blades.
#1
#2
_________________ I'm new to vintage lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2020 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
...
Last edited by sergtum on Fri Nov 27, 2020 9:39 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thanosss7
Joined: 26 Nov 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2020 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanosss7 wrote:
Thank you sergtum! _________________ I'm new to vintage lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2020 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
I would say between 1961 and 1965. To be more precise, you will need to find a passport of a lens with close serial number. _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thanosss7
Joined: 26 Nov 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2020 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanosss7 wrote:
BurstMox wrote: |
I would say between 1961 and 1965. To be more precise, you will need to find a passport of a lens with close serial number. |
Ok! Maybe a bit dificult, but thank you for the tip! _________________ I'm new to vintage lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bkwphoto
Joined: 29 Jul 2013 Posts: 8 Location: usa
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2020 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bkwphoto wrote:
Hi all,
I have that rare copy of Helios 44-2 with distance in feet instead of meters. Here are some pics. It's a good performer!
_________________ BKW |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thanosss7
Joined: 26 Nov 2020 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanosss7 wrote:
We still have strict lockdown here,so i can't test the lens as i want,but the few chances i got to try the 8 blades silver 42,i am very surprised with the color rendering! I almost don't have to retouch anything in my Raw files and i am so impressed specially with clouds and sunsets photos,cause i get the correct colors of what i see with my eyes!
#1
#2
#3
_________________ I'm new to vintage lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1636 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
Good shots! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Found some pics of the Helios 44-7. A dedicated lens for the Zenit-7 Camera
Zenit-7-709 by Marat, on Flickr
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
_________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2021 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
the Helios 44М-4 with the original A/M switch
ГелиоÑ-44Ðœ-4 Ñ Ñ€ÐµÐ¿Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÑ€Ð¾Ð¼ by Mr TTT, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2021 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
I did not seem to see the link to this youtube video here, so maybe useful for some reason. A guy who collects and modifies Helios lenses explains his 8-groups typology of Helios 44-2 family. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2021 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
I did not seem to see the link to this youtube video here, so maybe useful for some reason. A guy who collects and modifies Helios lenses explains his 8-groups typology of Helios 44-2 family.
|
what about N7160525? may be "1967 year"? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2021 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
I haven't caught this bug. Just thought his ideas could be interesting from some practical viewpoint. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shutterjunkie
Joined: 21 Mar 2021 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shutterjunkie wrote:
Hi all,
I really hope you can help me as I’ve been scouring resources online for hours on end to try and find an answer.
I have a Helios 44M lens which I use on my 5D Mark IV.. gorgeous lens and I love it. I’ve just purchased an early KMZ 44 M42 (8 blades) but I cannot find information to tell me whether I’ll be able to use this at infinity without it clipping the mirror. The buyer has kindly sent me a photo and it looks like the rear element protrudes by almost 4mm.
I’m hoping someone here has the same lens and has maybe used it on a 5D to give me some advice. Much appreciated in advance!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbass
Joined: 27 Jul 2019 Posts: 450
|
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2021 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cbass wrote:
I just picked up a copy similar to bkwphoto. Very early Helios 44-2 made by KMZ serial number N00700XX and the scale is in feet instead of meters. Yellow color instead of white.
Are we sure the Helios 44-2 with serial number N00XXX.. were made pre-1970?
It came with a camera made in 1971.
I could see it being made in 1970, but it might be a stretch to think it's pre-1970.
Then again I can't confirm that was the original lens to the camera so perhaps it is.
However, didn't Helios 44-2 production start in 1969?
Correction: Seems 44-2 production started in 1967. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 420
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2021 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
if this matters for the data-list as I can not find a match with my model:
Top ring: HELIOS-44, 2/58, serial N*8012602, MMZ
Barrel: Black / Zebra, white letters, Made in USSR,
pre-set, m39 (Zorki foc.dist so filled down that alu ring for 0.7mm to reach ~)
So this is strange as I read here that MMZ had this lens in the '70 in production and this serial is '80 .. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MartinV
Joined: 09 May 2013 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2021 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MartinV wrote:
alex_d wrote: |
if this matters for the data-list as I can not find a match with my model:
Top ring: HELIOS-44, 2/58, serial N*8012602, MMZ
Barrel: Black / Zebra, white letters, Made in USSR,
pre-set, m39 (Zorki foc.dist so filled down that alu ring for 0.7mm to reach ~)
So this is strange as I read here that MMZ had this lens in the '70 in production and this serial is '80 .. |
Your lens is from 1968, MMZ used a different serial numbering system for a while. The first digit of the serial number is the last digit of the production year. They did not make M39 lenses in 1980, M39 Zenit lenses were phased out around 1968-1969.
A quote from the beginning of the second post in this thread ( http://forum.mflenses.com/complete-list-of-helios-lenses-getting-closer-t26100.html#1009166 ):
Quote: |
MMZ lenses with serial number beginning by "N40xxx", "N50xxx" or "N60xxx" are likely made in 1964, 1965 and 1966 (first number of sn very likely means year of 196x decade) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 420
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
thanx Martin,
that was a good year, however confusing with info
MartinV wrote: |
alex_d wrote: |
if this matters for the data-list as I can not find a match with my model:
Top ring: HELIOS-44, 2/58, serial N*8012602, MMZ
Barrel: Black / Zebra, white letters, Made in USSR,
pre-set, m39 (Zorki foc.dist so filled down that alu ring for 0.7mm to reach ~)
So this is strange as I read here that MMZ had this lens in the '70 in production and this serial is '80 .. |
Your lens is from 1968, MMZ used a different serial numbering system for a while. The first digit of the serial number is the last digit of the production year. They did not make M39 lenses in 1980, M39 Zenit lenses were phased out around 1968-1969.
A quote from the beginning of the second post in this thread ( http://forum.mflenses.com/complete-list-of-helios-lenses-getting-closer-t26100.html#1009166 ):
Quote: |
MMZ lenses with serial number beginning by "N40xxx", "N50xxx" or "N60xxx" are likely made in 1964, 1965 and 1966 (first number of sn very likely means year of 196x decade) |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doetuck
Joined: 24 Sep 2021 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doetuck wrote:
I've just purchased a 44m 2/58 but it has no serial, just a KMZ logo. I'd like to have known the exact yeat of manufacturing. I'll post some pics when I get it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|