View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
frenched
Joined: 16 Feb 2013 Posts: 395 Location: MD USA
Expire: 2014-06-17
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:33 am Post subject: Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 AEG Ninja Stars |
|
|
frenched wrote:
Some don't like the ninja star bokeh, others do. I purposely bought this lens with this feature in mind. What are your opinions?
f/2.8, shot with Speedlite on Canon 450D and a little pp afterward
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
simbon4o
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 390 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
Well personally me... I do not like any rough shapes in the bokeh. It has to be smooth and pleasing especially in portrait lenses. _________________ 10-300мм 4.0 - 1.2 - 4.5 NIKON&Sony bodies / Sony 10-18, Pentax 28 2.8 II, CZJ 35 2.4, Nikkor DX 35 1.8, Samyang 35 1.4, KMZ 50 1.7, FDn 50 1.2 L, Nikkor 55 2.8, Rokkor 58 1.2, Soligor 85 1.8 Preset, Samyang 85 1.4, Canon FDn 85 1.2 L, Tokina AT-X 90 2.5, Canon FDn 135mm 2.0, Nikkor 180 2.8 ED, Tair 300 4.5
________
snimo.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Well, it is a matter of taste.
You obviously like the way these out of focus highlights have been rendered, and for this occasion with this model you have applied the result that this lens produces.
I can't imagine that all your portraits will have out of focus highlights in the background - on other occasions there may be no highlights and then the background bokeh will most likely be different.
You like it - that's all that matters.
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bernhardas
Joined: 01 Jan 2013 Posts: 1432
Expire: 2017-05-23
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
bernhardas wrote:
Edited
Last edited by bernhardas on Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CBokeh
Joined: 15 Oct 2009 Posts: 147 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:03 pm Post subject: Re: Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 AEG Ninja Stars |
|
|
CBokeh wrote:
frenched wrote: |
Some don't like the ninja star bokeh, others do. I purposely bought this lens with this feature in mind. What are your opinions?
|
If you need a rationale, you're just going for a cinematic look. Pick your favorite movie-- pick any movie-- and you'll find many shots with bokeh just like yours. Some Director of Photography even gets a shiny gold statue with a funny name handed to him once every year and that guy's shots are filled with stop signs made of light (the ninja stars may exaggerate that shape a bit, but not much). Do you think any Cinematographer has ever lost sleep over bokeh shapes? That's for internet forums to get worked up over. Just my opinion...
Very nice shot, BTW... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
this is my favorite most used lens from all what I have _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:08 pm Post subject: Re: Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 AEG Ninja Stars |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
CBokeh wrote: |
frenched wrote: |
Some don't like the ninja star bokeh, others do. I purposely bought this lens with this feature in mind. What are your opinions?
|
If you need a rationale, you're just going for a cinematic look. Pick your favorite movie-- pick any movie-- and you'll find many shots with bokeh just like yours. Some Director of Photography even gets a shiny gold statue with a funny name handed to him once every year and that guy's shots are filled with stop signs made of light (the ninja stars may exaggerate that shape a bit, but not much). Do you think any Cinematographer has ever lost sleep over bokeh shapes? That's for internet forums to get worked up over. Just my opinion...
Very nice shot, BTW... |
I dunno, the bokeh in Taxi Driver has always looked bad to my eyes.
I just don't understand why Zeiss would build a premium lens and then hamstring it with a crappy iris.
Taxi Driver, with infamous triangular oof highlights:
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7798 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Weird shaped bokeh can look good, as long as it doesn't become the focal point of the image , as Bernhard pointed out. If the picture by frenched had the same density of bokeh on both sides of the girl - I think it would have been better. I don't think it would have overpowered the portrait, because the girls face would be the focal point and not a small area of bright bokeh. I don't think the shape would make any difference other than the photographer wanting to have something different. Which can be the difference of selling an image or not. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
frenched
Joined: 16 Feb 2013 Posts: 395 Location: MD USA
Expire: 2014-06-17
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
frenched wrote:
CBokeh wrote: |
Do you think any Cinematographer has ever lost sleep over bokeh shapes? That's for internet forums to get worked up over. |
LOL +1.
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
I just don't understand why Zeiss would build a premium lens and then hamstring it with a crappy iris. |
Because Rollei paid Zeiss to build a Planar with a three-blade iris. Their check was good, so what the heck?
Also, I'd be the last man on Earth to argue with Martin Scorcese about cinematography.
Really, this lens is a 3-in-1. At f/1.4 it's fairly sharp along the focal plane but overall has a soft gentle look, very thin DOF and creamy circular bokeh. At f/2.0-f/2.8 you get the ninja stars. From f/4 and down the BG is back to "normal" and it becomes crazy sharp.
I understand it's all a matter of preference and I appreciate the comments. Here's another version of the shot for comparison. Same everything, but this time at f/1.4.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I much prefer the 1.4 shot, it's superb. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PhantomLord
Joined: 08 Apr 2013 Posts: 472 Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
PhantomLord wrote:
Seriously guys, seeing those beautiful green eyes of the gorgeous girl I cannot give a c..p about the shape of the bokeh . However since frenched had asked I have to say I like ninja bokeh very much as well as those triangular ones in Taxi Driver - it's something different from all round or ugly hexagonal-shaped. To be frankly honest I prefer f/1.4 smile of the girl with f/2.8 ninja bokeh . With lens wide open bokeh circles on this photo are too big, too distracting and too artificial for me, but of course it's just my humble opinion.
Mateusz _________________ Mateusz
No good story ever starts with drinking tea.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mateuszmolik/sets/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
Hexagon is ugly and Ninja is nice ? Well, why not. Let's say, hexagon is common.
For me the shape of the highlights is not what matters the most when it goes about bokeh.
By the way, I prefer #2 because it is softer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PhantomLord
Joined: 08 Apr 2013 Posts: 472 Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
PhantomLord wrote:
memetph, well... you're right maybe hexagonal are just common not ugly, but I somewhat dislike them. Of course I don't mind if they're showing on the photo somewhere, but to be main part of the image...not the best thing for me.
As for other properties of bokeh apart from shape of the highlights I agree as well, but topic was about the shape of the highlights . _________________ Mateusz
No good story ever starts with drinking tea.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mateuszmolik/sets/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tervueren
Joined: 18 May 2011 Posts: 1177 Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-08
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 3:10 pm Post subject: Re: Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 AEG Ninja Stars |
|
|
Tervueren wrote:
frenched wrote: |
Some don't like the ninja star bokeh, others do. I purposely bought this lens with this feature in mind. What are your opinions |
My opinion is, you have produced 2 great images of a beautiful woman, the background in both of these images are just that 'backgrounds' and this young lady would look great in front of a garbage dump, if pushed for my favourite it would be the stars as long as in this case it's not overdone, looks quite hollywoodish |
|
Back to top |
|
|
frenched
Joined: 16 Feb 2013 Posts: 395 Location: MD USA
Expire: 2014-06-17
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
frenched wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
I much prefer the 1.4 shot, it's superb. |
Thanks, Ian. Coming from you that's high praise indeed.
FYI the model happens to be my step-daughter. She and her husband came over for Christmas Eve dinner and I was teasing her about her hat. So I stood her up against the lighted Christmas tree and fired off a few snaps. She's a good sport.
Seems the opinions are running about 50/50 on the ninja stars. I was on the fence myself, but talked myself into the AEG in the hopes of learning how to handle it properly. So far I'm loving the lens.
Happy New Year, everyone! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7798 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I kinda prefer the second shot, but the first has a lot going for it. Don't give up on it! _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|