| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
luisalegria
 Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:55 pm Post subject: Zeiss Biotar 75/1.5 - no Red T ? |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
The CZJ Biotar I recently received looks like all the ones of the same model I can find on the net, but it lacks the red T that I always see.
The Red T indicates a certain type of coating, right ? Therefore this one of mine lacks that ?
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3262/2660647757_6e35d3dc71_o.jpg
Note - I will be listing it here for sale or trade. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
They have two version with T and without T , this is exactly say glass covered with famous Carl Zeiss Jena coating or not.In practical usage doesn't matter. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
estudleon
 Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3791 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Here is applicable that the old is the best (7,5 cm. better than 75 mm.)? _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I have many versions I found the sharpest id 1951 7,5cm thin Biotar later fat version almost that good. Pre-war copy is not same sharp at wide open, but tack sharp also when stopped down. Sharpest lens what I seen at wide open.
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/zeiss/carl_zeiss_jena_biotar/ _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
estudleon
 Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3791 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Thanks, Attila, very much.
Did you see www.pbase.com/recbo/compare_75_80_85?
Regards _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Yes I know author , he spend pretty much money on this tests and made lot of fine work. Many people like this kind of tests to see lenses strongest parts and weakness. This is too boring to me , I can't do it and not interest also on results. A lens has many more important feature than sharpness. So I like to take best photos what I can and show them for public, people can judge on real pictures this is my way. If you see Louise pictures he use many cheap "crappy" lenses and make better pictures than most of the people with high priced gears. If we compare his lenses on this kind of test surely nobody want them, but if we see beautiful pictures taken by him this lenses has very good chance to survive, because Louise showed to us they real power. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rick_oleson
 Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
By its serial number, your lens should date from about 1956, by which time to the best of my knowledge all CZJ lenses had been coated for over 10 years. It's not possible to tell from your photo, but it should be easy for you to see the blue or violet surface tint that would indicate a coated lens as compared to the neutral gray color of an uncoated one.
I have two 58/2 Biotars and a 50/2.8 Tessar here with serial numbers above 4 million, none of which have the red T; and an 80/2.8 Tessar just below 4 million that does have it. All, of course, are coated lenses. Perhaps CZJ stopped using the red T marking around the 4 million mark, just as manufacturers later stopped marking their lenses "MC" after multicoating had become so common as to be taken for granted. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bob955i
 Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bob955i wrote:
I have two Biotar 75s; one 66XXXX serial number in Exakta mount and one 62XXXX serial number in M42 mount and a semi-auto Biotar 58 57XXXX serial number in M42 - all are coated as one would expect, but none have the red 'T' designation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
T or not doesn't matter especially if lens was cleaned I have several copies from Olympic Sonnar sharpest one is not marked with T and most used from all of them. Really garbage looking my highest offer was 600 USD for this lens I did not sold That for sure 75mm f1.5 a beautiful lens and not many maker could produce better lens today. It is blame most of the lens under 500 EUR. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
Last edited by Attila on Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bob955i
 Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bob955i wrote:
| Attila wrote: |
T or not doesn't matter especially if lens was cleaned  |
With an 800 grit lens cloth....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I bought a rare black Biotar 58mm f2, front lens and rare lens both was "super" cleaned f* asshole cleaned at morning at lunch time and before he went to bed.. Result? I couldn't make any usable capture with this lens. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
estudleon
 Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3791 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
[quote="Attila"] A lens has many more important feature than sharpness. So I like to take best photos what I can and show them for public, people can judge on real pictures this is my way. If you see Louise pictures he use many cheap "crappy" lenses and make better pictures than most of the people with high priced gears. ....[/quote]
ATTILA
Of course that you are right, and, in the essencial I'm agree.
But I don't like vey much the pics without "F/64" sharpest, independent of others elements like contrast, saturation, subject matter, social message, etc, except if the soft is specially look for.
And then, I wan to to sell my fujinon SF 85/4.
Regards, Attila. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|