View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 8:51 pm Post subject: Yashica ML 21mm f3.5 on Sony A7R |
|
|
Attila wrote:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#15
#16
_________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I like Yashica lenses a lot, they do the job with no drama or anything special, which is why they are not hugely popular or expensive. There is nothing 'special' about the Yashica's I've got, nothing that makes them outstanding when compared to other makers lenses. They are just very good lenses, and there's nothing wrong with that. A long time ago I likened Yashica lenses to Toyota's, there's little to get excited about, but they do exactly what they set out to do.
It's a great set of pictures Attila, and difficult pictures as well. Many lesser lenses would be flaring badly and washed out taking some of those pictures into the sun, that's an impressive lens - and photographer. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Some Yashica lenses are out of mass, in my experience ML 21, 24 and macro 55mm are excellent. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
Very nice! How would you say it compares to the zuiko 3.5/21? Looking at the images I enjoyed the zuiko post better, but interested to hear. Thanks for sharing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4572 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
StillSanj wrote: |
Very nice! How would you say it compares to the zuiko 3.5/21? Looking at the images I enjoyed the zuiko post better, but interested to hear. Thanks for sharing |
I was just thinking and wondering the same _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1840 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
A long time ago I likened Yashica lenses to Toyota's, there's little to get excited about, but they do exactly what they set out to do. |
Great comparison, and spot on!
Talking about cars: in picture no. 5 i see a Lancia Thema Pininfarina SW! Attila, you should've taken a pic of that one instead of the Merc..... those were great cars (owned one years ago...) and even back then they were rare, today they have become dinosaurs!
BTW: I like your series of wide-angle tests! Good work! _________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3071 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Nice shots, Attila. I was in the same area yesterday with my Yashinon ML 1.7/50mm.
I will post some photos later. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I think Zuiko is better lens, smaller, more tolerant to flare , probably sharper. Diameter of Zuiko only 49mm I love small lenses. Yashica has one significant benefit to me, it's mount Contax I can't afford 1000 USD or more for a 21mm Distagon , this lens can be usefull on Contax film cameras. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
meanwhile
Joined: 29 May 2014 Posts: 225 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-11-28
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
meanwhile wrote:
Attila wrote: |
I think Zuiko is better lens, smaller, more tolerant to flare , probably sharper. Diameter of Zuiko only 49mm I love small lenses. Yashica has one significant benefit to me, it's mount Contax I can't afford 1000 USD or more for a 21mm Distagon , this lens can be usefull on Contax film cameras. |
A bit more distortion too? Though the corners seem better in terms of sharpness. _________________ In my bag: Sony A7II - Olympus OM 21mm f/3.5 - Minolta M-Rokkor 40mm f/2.0 - Konica Hexanon 57mm f/1.2 AR - Olympus Zuiko OM 100mm f/2.8 - Pentax 135mm f/3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Looks pretty good, I particularly like #12. However, I agree, the Zuiko looks slightly better. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
I like Yashica lenses a lot, they do the job with no drama or anything special, which is why they are not hugely popular or expensive. There is nothing 'special' about the Yashica's I've got, nothing that makes them outstanding when compared to other makers lenses. They are just very good lenses, and there's nothing wrong with that. A long time ago I likened Yashica lenses to Toyota's, there's little to get excited about, but they do exactly what they set out to do.
It's a great set of pictures Attila, and difficult pictures as well. Many lesser lenses would be flaring badly and washed out taking some of those pictures into the sun, that's an impressive lens - and photographer. |
That's my take on Yashicas too, reliable but not outstanding. The 2.8/24 is pretty good though. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 551 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
I like Olympus 21/3,5, from these Attila's samples, way more than Yashica. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2929 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
I agree re: Oly. I do like Yashica lenses though. I have several. As regards ultra wide I managed to get decent bargains on a Asahi Super Multi coated Takumar 20mm 4.5 (89 usd + 5 s&H) and have coming in the mail a CZJ flektogon 20mm f4 (79 usd 13 s&h) Haven't had a chance to really try them out yet but thought I would ask opinions. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 10:42 am Post subject: Re: Yashica ML 21mm f3.5 on Sony A7R |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Looking at these images, the upper left corner seems to be quite un-sharp, even tough tese images were probably not taken wide open.
I recetly have acquired a Yashica ML 21mm 1:3.5 which has the same problem (the upper right corner is distinctively better).
Is this a problem of the lens, or is your (mine) adapter not plan-parallel?
Superwides do react especially sensitive to a small change in flange distance ...
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Quite possible adapter fault, I use cheap , loose fit Chinese adapters _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Thanks for the information! I'll check my adapter - also a Chinese one - with other lenses such as the ML 28mm f2.8.
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|