Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Why do my posted photos look slightly "washed out"
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Techniques
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
badgerhill



Level 1

Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 56
Location: New Hampshire, USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:47 am    Post subject: Why do my posted photos look slightly "washed out" Reply with quote

HELP!

I notice that the photos I post seem to lose a bit of brilliance. I save them in Photoshop at 100dpi then convert the .psd file to a .jpg file optimized, 100% quality and when they appear on the web they're slightly washed out????? As you probably know you can preview the web image in Photoshop and even when I try to increase saturation a bit there is no change in the web image. I'm baffled. Any suggestions?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
luisalegria



Level 3

Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 813
Location: San Francisco, USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm.

I just hit the Photoshop "Auto Contrast" whenever anything isn't looking too good and it clears things up. Maybe a little too much, often.
_________________
Pentax K100D, SV, SP1000, SP500, LX, SF10, Mamiya 1000TL, Sears/Ricoh TLS, Exakta VX, VXIIb, Olympus OM-10, Nikon FM, Zeiss Contaflex B, Retina Reflex S, IV, Rolleiflex, Speed Graphic & Meridian 4x5, misc. rangefinders and folders, several dozen lenses and etc., et. al., ad infinitum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 11664
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:51 am    Post subject: Re: Why do my posted photos look slightly "washed out&a Reply with quote

badgerhill wrote:
HELP!
I notice that the photos I post seem to lose a bit of brilliance. I save them in Photoshop at 100dpi then convert the .psd file to a .jpg file optimized, 100% quality and when they appear on the web they're slightly washed out????? As you probably know you can preview the web image in Photoshop and even when I try to increase saturation a bit there is no change in the web image. I'm baffled. Any suggestions?


You need to convert the colour space before exporting to JPG.

When you have finished your editing in Photoshop, go to menu "Edit>Convert to Profile" and as destination space, select "sRGB IEC61966-2.1"

Now you can export your file to JPG and it will retain the intended colours.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Carl Zeiss, Leitz, Soviet, old Nikkors, others.
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, 50D. SLR: Contax AX, RX, 167MT; Voigtländer Bessaflex TM; Praktica FX2; Nikon FM2, F70.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Kiev-4, Voigtlaender Bessa-T, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta, Agfa Record II.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ChrisLilley



Level 3

Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 940
Location: Nice, France

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

luisalegria wrote:
Hmm.

I just hit the Photoshop "Auto Contrast" whenever anything isn't looking too good and it clears things up. Maybe a little too much, often.


That is not the cause of the error, if it looks fine in Photoshop and not fine when it is posted to the forum. I am sure Orio is correct here, its because the images are in AdobeRGB colorspace but are being displayed by a non colorprofile aware application (ie most Web browsers).
_________________
Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ais, Ai'ed, pre-Ai
Camera: Nikon D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 non-AI | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Nikkor-S.C 50mm f/1.4 non-AI | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 E | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Vivitar Series 1 (Kiron) 70-210 f/3.5 | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChrisLilley



Level 3

Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 940
Location: Nice, France

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:25 am    Post subject: Re: Why do my posted photos look slightly "washed out&a Reply with quote

Orio wrote:

When you have finished your editing in Photoshop, go to menu "Edit>Convert to Profile" and as destination space, select "sRGB IEC61966-2.1"

Now you can export your file to JPG and it will retain the intended colours.


Yes.

Furthermore, I recommend selecting 'relative colorimetric' as the method and checking 'black point compensation', for best effects. Unless significant portions of your image really are outside the sRGB gamut, this wil tend to preserve saturation better.
_________________
Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ais, Ai'ed, pre-Ai
Camera: Nikon D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 non-AI | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Nikkor-S.C 50mm f/1.4 non-AI | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 E | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Vivitar Series 1 (Kiron) 70-210 f/3.5 | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schnauzer



Level 3

Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 642
Location: Maine

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Orio and Chris. A few years ago I had the same problem with pictures posted on the web and that was the problem
_________________
Ron
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Prometheus



Level 2

Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 466
Location: Garphyttan, Sweden

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a little note to all using the new firefox: Firefox 3 comes with colour-management. Havent tried that function yet, but will do so tonight.
(a firend of mine tried the colour-managementfunction and said it makes a big difference).
_________________
Mattias Wirf

RetroCamera | YashicaForum.com
Mattias@Flickr | My swedish website

My lenses (A list at Retrocamera.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7119
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PS' "Auto Contrast" does influence the image considerably - definitely not "non-destructive"! Wink
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS500, Spotmatic SPII, Yashica-24, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Kiron: 2/28;70-210 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;2.8/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 1.7/50;2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Petri2.8/28; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; 2.8/135; Weltblick3.5/135; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bob955i



Level 3

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1715
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 4:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:
PS' "Auto Contrast" does influence the image considerably - definitely not "non-destructive"! Wink


Yes - check the histogram before and after.....
_________________
"The badger winks twice before the cheese explodes!"


DSLR: Canon EOS 5D
SLR: Ihagee Exa (V4), Exakta VX, Exakta Varex VX, Exakta Varex IIa, Exakta Varex IIb, Exakta VX 1000, Pentacon F, Pentacon FM, Pentacon FBM, Praktica BC-1, Voigtländer Bessaflex TM black
Medium Format: Mamiya RB67 Pro-S, Pentacon Six TL, Yashica 635
Rangefinder: Rank-Mamiya 4B
Bridge: Minolta DiMage 7i
P&S: Olympus XA-3
Lenses by the following makers:
Carl Zeiss Jena, Carl Zeiss Oberkochen, Hanimex, Mamiya, Meyer Optik Görlitz, Pentacon, Prakticar, Schneider-Kreuznach, Sigma, Super Paragon

Gear junkies look here
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lahnet



Level 3

Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 570
Location: Denmark

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have also had the same problem. After setting Photoshop like this the problem is gone. I think it is the same as Orio and Chris suggests.

Hope it helps.


_________________
Henrik
Lahnet-Foto
My FLICKR
Lens list
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 11664
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do not recommend to set working colourspace to sRGB.
sRGB has less colours and to work inside it means to reduce the shadings in your pictures.
My recommendation is to keep AdobeRGB as working colourspace, and only convert to sRGB (using the procedure I described above) when you need to output a JPG file.
The original TIF file should always be kept saved with AdobeRGB embedded.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Carl Zeiss, Leitz, Soviet, old Nikkors, others.
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, 50D. SLR: Contax AX, RX, 167MT; Voigtländer Bessaflex TM; Praktica FX2; Nikon FM2, F70.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Kiev-4, Voigtlaender Bessa-T, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta, Agfa Record II.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lahnet



Level 3

Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 570
Location: Denmark

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
I do not recommend to set working colourspace to sRGB.
sRGB has less colours and to work inside it means to reduce the shadings in your pictures.
My recommendation is to keep AdobeRGB as working colourspace, and only convert to sRGB (using the procedure I described above) when you need to output a JPG file.
The original TIF file should always be kept saved with AdobeRGB embedded.


That is of course very true. I have thought of this and also tried to see if it is possible to see the different when printing (home and out of home). To me it is impossible to see any different but maybe others can.

I shoot i RAW and after my RAW workflow is done, files are saved as TIFF or DNG in AdobeRGB. It is first when I import the files into Photoshop the convetion to SRGB is done.

Mabye not the perfect way but it works for me.
_________________
Henrik
Lahnet-Foto
My FLICKR
Lens list
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Schnauzer



Level 3

Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 642
Location: Maine

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I change to sRGB last thing before saving for web.
_________________
Ron
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
badgerhill



Level 1

Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 56
Location: New Hampshire, USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm trying everyone's suggestions. But no matter what I try there's a difference between the previewed web pic and my more natural original. I'll keep trying. By the way in the color settings dialog box theres a"More Options" button. I'm trying them all...but there are lots of permutations.
Thanks for the tips everyone. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rob Leslie



Level 3

Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 662
Location: UK Swindon

PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The simplest way is to use ‘Save for Web’
Using this option means you get a good preview of what the image should look like on the web.
Thats why it is there.
_________________
Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com


Last edited by Rob Leslie on Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:14 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Techniques All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group