View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2020 10:43 pm Post subject: Which triplet to buy |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Some triplets are in the market.
I can choose among
Ludwing's Meritar 2,9/45
Meyer's Trioplan 2,8/50 - 3,5/45
Meyer's Domiplan 2,8/50
Voigtlandër's Voigtar 2,8-3,5/50
Ikon's Pantar 2,8/50
All cheapo lenses. Any of them have a special feature that makes it interesant?
Thanks
Last edited by papasito on Fri May 29, 2020 11:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2927 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2020 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
I have used the trioplan (vintage uncoated from a folding camera) and the Domiplan (late 60s probably from a praktica, just a complete piece of crap, the diaphragm was loose, the "helical" was a slot with a plastic pin) I like the trioplan better but the poor materials and workmanship on the domiplan really turned me off to that lens so I may be biased due to the specific version I started with. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2020 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
I have used the trioplan (vintage uncoated from a folding camera) and the Domiplan (late 60s probably from a praktica, just a complete piece of crap, the diaphragm was loose, the "helical" was a slot with a plastic pin) I like the trioplan better but the poor materials and workmanship on the domiplan really turned me off to that lens so I may be biased due to the specific version I started with. |
I can access a trioplan 2,8/50 of an Altix camera or 3,5/45 of the Beirette. The 2,8/50 seems to be better build and perhaps better optics |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2927 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
I have also used the trioplan 100mm in Exakta (the "bokeh bubble" thing) but also slower older 105's and 75 from folders. They all seemed very good quality and workmanship wise. Being a triplet likely means soft corners when open but all the ones I have tried sharpen nicely in the middle with a few stops. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 12:55 am Post subject: Re: Which triplet to buy |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
papasito wrote: |
Some triplets are in the market.
I can choose among
Ludwing's Meritar 2,9/45
Meyer's Trioplan 2,8/50 - 3,5/45
Meyer's Domiplan 2,8/50
Voigtlandër's Voigtar 2,8-3,5/50
Ikon's Pantar 2,8/50
All cheapo lenses. Any of them have a special feature that makes it interesant?
Thanks |
The Domiplan is a hit or miss. I got a good one on only my second try but is not as good as the Trioplan, which is f/2.9, not 2.8. My Trioplan is the Altix mount, and easy adaptation, and very sharp. It also delivers the soap bubble bokeh when the circumstances are right.
I only got a Meritar recently with several other lenses in a lot sale. The one I have is not very good. I can't comment on the others but do think the Trioplan is a very good lens. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 1:14 am Post subject: Re: Which triplet to buy |
|
|
papasito wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
papasito wrote: |
Some triplets are in the market.
I can choose among
Ludwing's Meritar 2,9/45
Meyer's Trioplan 2,8/50 - 3,5/45
Meyer's Domiplan 2,8/50
Voigtlandër's Voigtar 2,8-3,5/50
Ikon's Pantar 2,8/50
All cheapo lenses. Any of them have a special feature that makes it interesant?
Thanks |
The Domiplan is a hit or miss. I got a good one on only my second try but is not as good as the Trioplan, which is f/2.9, not 2.8. My Trioplan is the Altix mount, and easy adaptation, and very sharp. It also delivers the soap bubble bokeh when the circumstances are right.
I only got a Meritar recently with several other lenses in a lot sale. The one I have is not very good. I can't comment on the others but do think the Trioplan is a very good lens. |
Yes, you are right. IT's a f/2,9 lens.
Thank you.
IT cames with an Altix nb |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1053 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Back in their time TT&H were considered the unsurpassed masters of the high quality triplets. I had a lot of them and still have 6 or 7, mostly for medium and large format. Some of them are amazingly good on FF and have a nice character. Even if they are a bit older I'll recommend to check them, too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 514 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
A Domiplan in good working condition is a perfectly nice lens.
Any of the Steinheil Cassar variants, Cassarit or Cassaron are good, though the aperture is inclined to stick on the auto-aperture versions, in my experience.
A Lomo T-43, salvaged from a Cosmic 35 or one of the variants can be remounted for use on a mirrorless camera, similarly a Schneider Reomar from a Retinette, the 50mm version will even mount on a Pentax DSLR with infinity focus
For experience with a longer focal length, the Zeiss 135mm Triotar can be interesting, with the traditional Zeiss quality
Just remember, the "bubble bokeh" effect that is so popular is usually only fully achieved under carefully controlled circumstances, the lens will usually be on extension tubes or bellows and the out-of-focus highlights will be a fairly specific distance behind the subject |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6008 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
There are very many triplets that are enlarging lenses.
Most are quite good and usually very cheap.
I only have the Boyer Paris Topaz 105mm f4.5, but it is rather special.
Some shots here
http://forum.mflenses.com/boyer-paris-topaz-105mm-f45-t81508.html
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
Nicest surprise for me in the cheap 'n' cheery category has been the coated 2.9 50 Meritar, exa mount. Also, I find the ergonomics excellent. I can focus and change aperture at the same time with thumb on focus ring and index on aperture ring. I don't know how common that is, or its necessity to be honest, it's just that the Meritar seems to encourage you to try it.
Not a great angle, but the aperture control is the middle, knurled, ring just in front of the scalloped focus ring. They work very well together.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
dan_ wrote: |
Back in their time TT&H were considered the unsurpassed masters of the high quality triplets. I had a lot of them and still have 6 or 7, mostly for medium and large format. Some of them are amazingly good on FF and have a nice character. Even if they are a bit older I'll recommend to check them, too. |
Thank you Dan.
Not common lenses in my market.
I will look for any of them |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
kypfer wrote: |
A Domiplan in good working condition is a perfectly nice lens.
Any of the Steinheil Cassar variants, Cassarit or Cassaron are good, though the aperture is inclined to stick on the auto-aperture versions, in my experience.
A Lomo T-43, salvaged from a Cosmic 35 or one of the variants can be remounted for use on a mirrorless camera, similarly a Schneider Reomar from a Retinette, the 50mm version will even mount on a Pentax DSLR with infinity focus
For experience with a longer focal length, the Zeiss 135mm Triotar can be interesting, with the traditional Zeiss quality
Just remember, the "bubble bokeh" effect that is so popular is usually only fully achieved under carefully controlled circumstances, the lens will usually be on extension tubes or bellows and the out-of-focus highlights will be a fairly specific distance behind the subject |
Thanks Kypfer.
In my market the Domiplan costs almost the same than Minolta MD 50/1,4 (near u$s 90).
Not the adecuate cost for my taste |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Thank you, Tom.
As always, your pic is very nice
My market is very little. No lenses like yours. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Sciolist wrote: |
Nicest surprise for me in the cheap 'n' cheery category has been the coated 2.9 50 Meritar, exa mount. Also, I find the ergonomics excellent. I can focus and change aperture at the same time with thumb on focus ring and index on aperture ring. I don't know how common that is, or its necessity to be honest, it's just that the Meritar seems to encourage you to try it.
Not a great angle, but the aperture control is the middle, knurled, ring just in front of the scalloped focus ring. They work very well together.
|
Thank you Sciolist
I only see that lens with the Beirette camera.
Don't know if both have similar rendering |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1552 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
The Trioplan 50mm f/2.9 is my top choice. I have a good Domiplan Q1 that is slightly better than the Trioplan when not making bubbles.
Meritar 50mm f/2.9: Had one but it was not preforming well.
Trioplan 45mm f/3.5. I have tested a Pentona II with this lens and found it not worth to adapt.
Samples with bokeh are rare so I'll link a few here: https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=158051784%40N03&sort=date-taken-desc&text=pentona%20ii&view_all=1
Rodenstock Rogonar 50mm f/2.8 a new triplet good performance but bokeh less interesting than older lenses.
Zeiss Ikon Novicar 50mm 2.8: good.
Voigtländer Lanthar 50mm 2.8: good.
Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 Paxette: Very good soap bubble maker but bad edge sharpness.
Last edited by blotafton on Sat May 30, 2020 5:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
papasito wrote: |
Thank you Sciolist
I only see that lens with the Beirette camera.
Don't know if both have similar rendering |
Mine was standard fitment on the EXA I. Fairly plentiful. I can't comment on comparison with the Beirette unfortunately. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 406 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
If you like bubbles consider the Fuji 55mm f2.2 _________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 760 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
My two favorite triplets are the old slim CZJ 135 Triotar 4 and the Isco 100 Isconar 4.5.
The triotar is just excellent if you can find a good one.
I've got a Domiplan too, and mine is quite good. I guess I got lucky. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|