| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2853
Location: The Netherlands
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 7:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
caspert79 wrote:
| starbucklover69 wrote: |
And another day with delivery. Nikon F with Nikkor-P Auto 105 f2.5 and Nikkormat with Nikkor 24 f2.8 AiS
and Admiral Panagor 55 f3 Macro
 |
Nice find! The Panagor (Vivitar) is surprisingly good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10362
Location: California
Expire: 2021-06-22
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| starbucklover69 wrote: |
And another day with delivery. Nikon F with Nikkor-P Auto 105 f2.5 and Nikkormat with Nikkor 24 f2.8 AiS
and Admiral Panagor 55 f3 Macro
pics
|
 The Sonnar! (One of my favorite lenses!) https://www.destoutz.ch/lens_105mm_f2.5_215011.html 
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony A7Rii, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200
Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300
Macro-Takumar 1:4/50
Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm
Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element),
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100
Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100
SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
Other lenses:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
starbucklover69
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Posts: 39
Location: Swiss
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
starbucklover69 wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
| starbucklover69 wrote: |
And another day with delivery. Nikon F with Nikkor-P Auto 105 f2.5 and Nikkormat with Nikkor 24 f2.8 AiS
and Admiral Panagor 55 f3 Macro
pics
|
The Sonnar! (One of my favorite lenses!) https://www.destoutz.ch/lens_105mm_f2.5_215011.html |
Its my third 105mm Nikon. I have the Ai and Ai-S. And my sixth Nikon F. One in black. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3733
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Picked up a Rokkor 58mm f/1.4 MCii, nice lens. |
Absolutely. Especially on high res APS-C (24 MP) and in b/w mode it is a very nice "character" portrait lens.
On 24 MP FF the lens is very useable as well, especially wide open in b/w mode. Stopped down it gets very sharp with a high contrast over th entire frame including corners. Certainly not worse than the well known MC Rokkor 1.4/50mm! Quite a bit better than the AR / MC-I 1.4/58mm in my opinion. It seems Minolta was re-computing the original AR 1.4/58mm around 1968 when they got their new in-house "large computer".
During that time they were developing a bunch of excellent lenses including the famous MC 1.2/58mm, the MC 2.8/16mm fisheye, the 2.8/21mm superwide, the fast 2.5/28mm and 1.8/35mm wideangles as well as the 1.7/85 portrait and the 4.5/300mm tele lens. Espeically the wideangles were the fastest retrofocus designs of their time.
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022
Posts: 366
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| simple.joy wrote: |
Wow, congrats - you have two? I have some experience with those lenses myself, so I'm well aware of their limitations and drawbacks. However - because I've started an article on C. Friedrich, which I want to continue working on some time in the future - I would really love to try a 75/2.8 S-Coronar, if possible. So if you ever decide to part with one, please keep me in mind! 👍 |
Yes. It seems I have pretty good luck on finding this lens but I am not able to find the other 50/75/100 S-Coronar! I will post some samples later after I finish adapting my other copy with a proper hood. This copy may goes to my friend since he is also collecting these. You will find one day if you can wait.
|
Thanks! I'm sure it's in good hands then. Hope it will be used. Pretty sure many of those lenses are not.
_________________
---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3733
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Sigma 3.5/14mm - badly polluted / fogged as the other two samples of the lens I already owned ...
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020
Posts: 944
Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
| starbucklover69 wrote: |
| And another day with delivery. Nikon F with Nikkor-P Auto 105 f2.5 and Nikkormat with Nikkor 24 f2.8 AiS and Admiral Panagor 55 f3 Macro[url=http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20241/big_12287_20240126_202343_1.jpg] |
The micro-prism spot screen in the Nikkormat works well with some fast lenses- A good pairing is the "S" 50mm f1.4, or even the 105 shown in your photo. Apart from a bit of practice with that screen, the FTN is still quite a viable camera. The shutter on mine is still accurate.
-D.S.
_________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 801
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
| caspert79 wrote: |
| starbucklover69 wrote: |
And another day with delivery. Nikon F with Nikkor-P Auto 105 f2.5 and Nikkormat with Nikkor 24 f2.8 AiS
and Admiral Panagor 55 f3 Macro
|
Nice find! The Panagor (Vivitar) is surprisingly good. |
Excellent I would say. Too bad mine became hazy.
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014
Posts: 65
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
just a humble one, ISCO Isconar 135mm f4 (older, metal version), I have a thing for triplets so couldn't miss this one in my collection |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2853
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| DrBB wrote: |
| just a humble one, ISCO Isconar 135mm f4 (older, metal version), I have a thing for triplets so couldn't miss this one in my collection |
It’s not a bad lens at all. It has beautiful smooth bokeh. MFD is a bit long, but you can use an extension ring to get closer to your subject. Some examples: https://www.flickr.com/gp/55691955@N05/52R4C0hdW3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014
Posts: 65
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2024 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
| caspert79 wrote: |
| DrBB wrote: |
| just a humble one, ISCO Isconar 135mm f4 (older, metal version), I have a thing for triplets so couldn't miss this one in my collection |
It’s not a bad lens at all. It has beautiful smooth bokeh. MFD is a bit long, but you can use an extension ring to get closer to your subject. Some examples: https://www.flickr.com/gp/55691955@N05/52R4C0hdW3 |
Oh yeah, I saw them (although those are from 100mm version, but should be similar with 135mm), beautiful results. I have quite few triplets (mostly 50 & 135, but even 17mm c-mount one) and never stopped to be amazed how that simple design, made by hands of old professionals, can produce such a stunning results. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2853
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Not a lens, but an adapter. The rediculous second hand prices that are usually asked refrained me from buying one, but now I found the LA-EA4 locally at a very attractive price. It means I can finally use all my AF lenses in AF mode. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014
Posts: 65
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2024 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
ROW Tegonar 35/3.5 Syst. Laack - 3 more lenses left to complete my Altix collection  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018
Posts: 835
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Spiratone 18mm/3.5 (Tokina 17mm/3.5 phi72mm) and 17mm/3.5 (Tokina 17mm/3.5 phi67mm). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
starbucklover69
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Posts: 39
Location: Swiss
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2024 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
starbucklover69 wrote:
New Day new Delivery 
Nikon F100 in good Condition , Aasahi Pentax S3 with Super Takumar 20 f4.5 and Lenshood and more and Olympus Pen-D
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3070
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2024 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
My latest lens is a Canon Zoom Lens FD 35-70mm 1:2.8-3.5.
It takes nice photos, but unfortunately does not reach infinity.
It is worse at 70mm and almost reaches infinity somewhere wider than 50mm.
At 35mm it also does not reach. It is not a problem with the adapter.
This is the newer version of the lens.
Is it fixable?
Examining further, when I turn the lens up and down I hear a clunking sound. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014
Posts: 65
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2024 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
another ROW Tegonar 35mm f3.5 (this one is without coating) Altix M22.5
CZJ Biotar 12.5mm f2 D-Mount (no idea what to do with this one)
E. Ludwig Victar 50mm f2.9 Exakta mount from '38 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018
Posts: 1035
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2024 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
| DrBB wrote: |
another ROW Tegonar 35mm f3.5 (this one is without coating) Altix M22.5
CZJ Biotar 12.5mm f2 D-Mount (no idea what to do with this one)
E. Ludwig Victar 50mm f2.9 Exakta mount from '38 |
the biotar might fit a m4/3 sensor? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BrianSVP
Joined: 09 Jun 2023
Posts: 168
Location: Philadelphia
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
BrianSVP wrote:
It's basically impossible that a d mount lens of that focal length will come even close to full coverage on m4/3. Perhaps the Pentax Q, but even that tiny sensor is larger than the 8mm film frame that lens was designed for.
| kiddo wrote: |
| DrBB wrote: |
another ROW Tegonar 35mm f3.5 (this one is without coating) Altix M22.5
CZJ Biotar 12.5mm f2 D-Mount (no idea what to do with this one)
E. Ludwig Victar 50mm f2.9 Exakta mount from '38 |
the biotar might fit a m4/3 sensor? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7495
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| BrianSVP wrote: |
It's basically impossible that a d mount lens of that focal length will come even close to full coverage on m4/3. Perhaps the Pentax Q, but even that tiny sensor is larger than the 8mm film frame that lens was designed for.
| kiddo wrote: |
| DrBB wrote: |
another ROW Tegonar 35mm f3.5 (this one is without coating) Altix M22.5
CZJ Biotar 12.5mm f2 D-Mount (no idea what to do with this one)
E. Ludwig Victar 50mm f2.9 Exakta mount from '38 |
the biotar might fit a m4/3 sensor? |
|
Should be OK with Nikon 1 camera.
https://pantip.com/topic/37394590
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7495
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
A lens that is very good for collecting.
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014
Posts: 65
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| BrianSVP wrote: |
It's basically impossible that a d mount lens of that focal length will come even close to full coverage on m4/3. Perhaps the Pentax Q, but even that tiny sensor is larger than the 8mm film frame that lens was designed for.
| kiddo wrote: |
| DrBB wrote: |
another ROW Tegonar 35mm f3.5 (this one is without coating) Altix M22.5
CZJ Biotar 12.5mm f2 D-Mount (no idea what to do with this one)
E. Ludwig Victar 50mm f2.9 Exakta mount from '38 |
the biotar might fit a m4/3 sensor? |
|
Should be OK with Nikon 1 camera.
https://pantip.com/topic/37394590 |
Yeah, I dont expect too much fun with D-Mount, i have couple of m4/3 cameras but i don't believe this little biotar will perform well on them (same as my Trioplan 17mm in C-Mount, need to crop 27% of the photo to get somewhat usable image).
...but anyways, these 3 lenses were part of the same lot and I was after Victar (and the won all of them for like 21eur) so it's OK, Biotar will be nice future project, especially if i ever get some of those small sensor cameras |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1927
Location: Slovenija
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
Mamiya Sekor SX 135/2.8
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2853
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| NikonD wrote: |
Mamiya Sekor SX 135/2.8
|
Very good lens, especially wide open.
Bought myself an M42 Sonnar 135mm f/4 and a Steinheil Tele-Quinar 135mm f/2.8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 554
Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
The M42 mount of that CStype has a peculiar outer raised ridge which makes it difficult to fit adapters .
p. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
