View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6549 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2023 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
Just received a fungused Mamiya 645 lens, the 210mm F4, for quite cheap - about $29
It prompted me to finally buy a lens tool, remove the front ring, clean the front element, which came up quite nicely.
[url=http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20235/big_282_sl1600i_1.jpg]
[/url]
Given that the lens came from Japan, and the postage was free, I think that's quite good. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop EU
http://www.fomafoto.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2023 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Farside wrote: |
Just received a fungused Mamiya 645 lens, the 210mm F4, for quite cheap - about $29
It prompted me to finally buy a lens tool, remove the front ring, clean the front element, which came up quite nicely.
|
Yeah, dismantling the front lens of the Mamiya Sekor C 4/210mm is quite an easy task. That said, I have a Sekor C 4/210 with a not cleanable front element. It's fogged, and nothing was able to remove that "fog". It seems the front element is quite sensitive to certain pollutants - I have never seen anything like that. Given the fact that the Sekor C has as little CAs as well known ED/AD/ULD lenses (e. g. Nikkor 2.8/180mm ED or Minolta AF 2.8/200mm AD), its front element may well be made from such glas.
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 631 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2023 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
This lens came in a group of 4 cameras, not a steal, but less than the going rate. It focuses down to 0.35 meters, not bad. The Praktica-Mat works, I haven't tested the meter yet, but the battery compartment looks clean. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars
Joined: 03 Nov 2021 Posts: 223 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2023 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars wrote:
Recently, a colleague of mine told me he wants to get rid of his old photo equipment and if he could bring it to me. He didn´t want money - just to have it out of the house. Besides a lot of cables, filters, an old Cullman flash with rail mount, these are the main contents of the khaki brown photo bag he pushed into my hands today. I told him at least the Macro might be worth quite some money, probably 500 bucks, and if he´s really sure, but he just said he´s fine knowing it´s in someone´s possession now who appreciates it. I feel kind of bad with that situation. How to say thank you for that?
_________________ Cheers, Gerhard |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2926 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2023 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars wrote: |
Recently, a colleague of mine told me he wants to get rid of his old photo equipment and if he could bring it to me. He didn´t want money - just to have it out of the house. Besides a lot of cables, filters, an old Cullman flash with rail mount, these are the main contents of the khaki brown photo bag he pushed into my hands today. I told him at least the Macro might be worth quite some money, probably 500 bucks, and if he´s really sure, but he just said he´s fine knowing it´s in someone´s possession now who appreciates it. I feel kind of bad with that situation. How to say thank you for that?
|
I see it includes my favorite macro lens, congratulations! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 551 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2023 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars wrote: |
Recently, a colleague of mine told me he wants to get rid of his old photo equipment and if he could bring it to me. He didn´t want money - just to have it out of the house. Besides a lot of cables, filters, an old Cullman flash with rail mount, these are the main contents of the khaki brown photo bag he pushed into my hands today. I told him at least the Macro might be worth quite some money, probably 500 bucks, and if he´s really sure, but he just said he´s fine knowing it´s in someone´s possession now who appreciates it. I feel kind of bad with that situation. How to say thank you for that?
|
a case of wine rarely fails its purpose |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2023 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Yashica ML 3.5/28-50mm, hidden in a lot of other stuff such as an early SR-T 101, a Yashica FR-I, a Rollei A26 with flash C26, a Ricoh 500G and finally a Minolta Dynax 5 with 28-105mm and 100-300mm zoom.
The Yashica ML 3.5/28-50mm has a pretty good reputation, similar to the Canon FD 3.5/28-50mm (not to be confused with the later nFD 28-55mm, which is a plastic fantastic lens).
The Yashica is pretty rare here in Switzerland; I may have seen it once or twice offered for sale, but never bothered to actually get one. I'll probably pick it up tomorrow - so let's see how it'll perform ...
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2926 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2023 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
Yashica ML 3.5/28-50mm, hidden in a lot of other stuff such as an early SR-T 101, a Yashica FR-I, a Rollei A26 with flash C26, a Ricoh 500G and finally a Minolta Dynax 5 with 28-105mm and 100-300mm zoom.
The Yashica ML 3.5/28-50mm has a pretty good reputation, similar to the Canon FD 3.5/28-50mm (not to be confused with the later nFD 28-55mm, which is a plastic fantastic lens).
The Yashica is pretty rare here in Switzerland; I may have seen it once or twice offered for sale, but never bothered to actually get one. I'll probably pick it up tomorrow - so let's see how it'll perform ...
S |
Some Yashica ML lenses are surprisingly good, I'm curious. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars
Joined: 03 Nov 2021 Posts: 223 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2023 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
I see it includes my favorite macro lens, congratulations! |
Thank you! I didn´t have the Bokina on the radar for purchase, but I´m really curious now how I get along with it.
Ultrapix wrote: |
a case of wine rarely fails its purpose |
Exactly what I have in mind!
Probably some _________________ Cheers, Gerhard |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2023 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro, original version, without USM. Will used in manual mode and compare with Minolta AF 100mm/2.8 macro. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2926 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2023 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro, original version, without USM. Will used in manual mode and compare with Minolta AF 100mm/2.8 macro. |
Performance should be quite comparable mtf wise. Look at photodo scores:
https://jimdoty.com/learn/Tips/Equipment/Macro_Lenses/macro_lenses.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1554 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2023 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro, original version, without USM. Will used in manual mode and compare with Minolta AF 100mm/2.8 macro. |
I've had one since about 2010. I scan all of my 35mm film with it with great result. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2023 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Thanks. Excellent webpage. My copy of Minolta 100/2.8 macro doesn't really have the sharpness compared to,
say, Vivitar series 1 90/2.5 or even Komine 90/2.8. Perhaps copy variation? Will check out this Canon macro once it arrives.
blotafton wrote: |
I've had one since about 2010. I scan all of my 35mm film with it with great result. |
Good to know. I've done some internet search. People praised the sharpness of this macro. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2926 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2023 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Thanks. Excellent webpage. My copy of Minolta 100/2.8 macro doesn't really have the sharpness compared to,
say, Vivitar series 1 90/2.5 or even Komine 90/2.8. Perhaps copy variation? Will check out this Canon macro once it arrives.
|
It should be very sharp normally. I did a comparison a while ago including also the Bokina and MD 100/4 macro.
http://forum.mflenses.com/minolta-md-100-4-vs-minolta-af-100-2-8-vs-tokina-at-x-90-2-5-t84444.html
Corners of the Minolta AF 100/2.8 are better at wider apertures. Center sharpness of the Bokina is hard to beat though (even wide open), it’s certainly one of the sharpest lenses I ever used. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019 Posts: 834
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2023 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
Yashica ML 3.5/28-50mm, hidden in a lot of other stuff such as an early SR-T 101, a Yashica FR-I, a Rollei A26 with flash C26, a Ricoh 500G and finally a Minolta Dynax 5 with 28-105mm and 100-300mm zoom.
S |
That Minolta AF 28 105 has good reputation. I 'd like to hear your opinion about it. _________________ Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019 Posts: 834
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2023 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
Alun Thomas wrote: |
cyberjunkie wrote: |
I have an identical lens (which should be the last iteration of the ISCO 2.8/180mm).
I'm curious about your personal opinion.
Which digital camera did you use to try it? |
I used a Panasonic S1, but haven't really had a good day with good light to test it properly.
It has only 3 optical groups so misalignment should be easily fixed. My copy had the rear element holder loose, it might be something to check.
I did take some flower images at MFD wide open, but they are heavily processed so not really indicative.
|
Nice pics. Even heavily processed if the lens is bad the outcome cannot be so good. _________________ Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019 Posts: 834
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2023 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
A good one. If you take the habit to find the middle aperture between 1,7 and 2,8 you will have a sharp lens without haze at around f2,0. Nothing beats that at this price. _________________ Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2023 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
vivaldibow wrote: |
Thanks. Excellent webpage. My copy of Minolta 100/2.8 macro doesn't really have the sharpness compared to,
say, Vivitar series 1 90/2.5 or even Komine 90/2.8. Perhaps copy variation? Will check out this Canon macro once it arrives.
|
It should be very sharp normally. I did a comparison a while ago including also the Bokina and MD 100/4 macro.
http://forum.mflenses.com/minolta-md-100-4-vs-minolta-af-100-2-8-vs-tokina-at-x-90-2-5-t84444.html
Corners of the Minolta AF 100/2.8 are better at wider apertures. Center sharpness of the Bokina is hard to beat though (even wide open), it’s certainly one of the sharpest lenses I ever used. |
Thanks. I remember that post. I'll probably shoot my copy of the Minolta 100/2.8 AF again to see. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Soligor 55mm f/2.8 macro C/D. Interesting seller said it is Nikon but after getting the lens, it seems the original mount is P/M42, which is very common for this 55mm/2.8 I've seen. But the mount is actually Nikon. Not sure if it's modified (may or may not fix the infinity focus issue) or just have an M42/F adapter screwed on. I tried to unscrew but the adapter is intact. Still thinking of a way trying to remove the adapter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2023 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Voigtlander Ultron 2/50 for Prominent in mint condition for the price of a couple of pints of beer at a local arts n craft/junk fair.
Always wanted one of these Ultrons, but no idea how I'm going to manage to adapt it for use, it doesn't have a helicoid for one thing. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2023 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
lumens pixel wrote: |
stevemark wrote: |
Yashica ML 3.5/28-50mm, hidden in a lot of other stuff such as an early SR-T 101, a Yashica FR-I, a Rollei A26 with flash C26, a Ricoh 500G and finally a Minolta Dynax 5 with 28-105mm and 100-300mm zoom.
S |
That Minolta AF 28 105 has good reputation. I 'd like to hear your opinion about it. |
The Minolta AF 28-105mm I mentioned is the early "xi" version without compensator group (ie esentially a varifocal lens, not a zoom). It's optical construction is different from the later Min AF 3.5-4.5/28-105mm "real zooms". I was never impressed with the proformance of the "xi" version, though.
Sh _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019 Posts: 834
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2023 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
lumens pixel wrote: |
stevemark wrote: |
Yashica ML 3.5/28-50mm, hidden in a lot of other stuff such as an early SR-T 101, a Yashica FR-I, a Rollei A26 with flash C26, a Ricoh 500G and finally a Minolta Dynax 5 with 28-105mm and 100-300mm zoom.
S |
That Minolta AF 28 105 has good reputation. I 'd like to hear your opinion about it. |
The Minolta AF 28-105mm I mentioned is the early "xi" version without compensator group (ie esentially a varifocal lens, not a zoom). It's optical construction is different from the later Min AF 3.5-4.5/28-105mm "real zooms". I was never impressed with the proformance of the "xi" version, though.
Sh |
_________________ Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1121
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2023 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Voigtlander Ultron 2/50 for Prominent in mint condition for the price of a couple of pints of beer at a local arts n craft/junk fair.
Always wanted one of these Ultrons, but no idea how I'm going to manage to adapt it for use, it doesn't have a helicoid for one thing. |
Is it the same as the one in this link?
http://forum.mflenses.com/voigtlander-ultron-50-2-adapted-to-sony-a7r-t77537.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D. P.
Joined: 26 Apr 2015 Posts: 150
|
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2023 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D. P. wrote:
Nikon Gugutto 120mm f/4.5
This lens is a part of Nikon's Fun Fun lens set (released in December 1995 as a set of three lenses - Gyogyotto Fisheye 20/8, Dodotto Tele 400/8 and Gugutto Macro 120/4.5 + Fuwatto Soft 90/4.8 ). Sales were limited to Japan, and only 5,000 sets were manufactured. Gugutto Macro 120/4.5 is a lens with a feature that allowed users to convert it to a soft focus lens themselves by disassembling and reassembling it in a different configuration (Fuwatto Soft). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2926 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2023 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Won a Topcor 9cm f/3.5 in M39 Mount in a Japanese auction. Condition of the thing not sure, we'll see! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|