View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stevemark
 Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 2648 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
RokkorDoctor wrote: |
IMHO the MC-I versions generally are the most aesthetically pleasing |
Hmmm ... I started collecting Minolta MF lenses with an MC-X 2.5/28mm which I bought to complement my XM (that one cam without a lens). Before I had only used Minolta AF stuff - the 9000 (bought the first one when I was 1 , the 9xi (grudgingly) and the Dynax 9 (excellent camera). The XM was bought to complete my collection of professional Minolta SLRs, and I never planned to acquire another set of lenses (the MinAF lenses were perfect for me). HOWEVER ... I soon saw a VERY cheap MD-II 35-70; then a nice MC 1.7/85, and the rest is history. So my preferred "incarnation" of manual Minolta lenses are the MC-X ... !
RokkorDoctor wrote: |
knurled focus ring, but not scalloped, and aluminium aperture rings. I still can't work out if those aperture rings are just anodised aluminium, or if they are matt-chromium plated as well. |
I have quite a few MC-I as well; only the MC-I 1.2/58 and the MC-I 3.5/135 are still missing. However I prefer the handling and the smooth focus of later MC-II / MC-X (and to some extent the early MD) lenses. But yeah, you're talking about aesthetics, not real world use
S
PS i really have to update the Minolta SR/AR/MC/MD stuff at artaphot ...especially the images! _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 9220 Location: California
Expire: 2021-06-22
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:2 / 35
Bought at bargain price "for parts only" to fix "missing a screw" lens bought previously -- received in excellent condition! Oh darn, still looking for parts lens. LOL _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
http://tinyurl.com/bgaho3q
Cameras: Sony A7Rii, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses: Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, Super-TAKUMAR 1:2/35 (Fat), Super-TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Auto-Takumars 1:2 f=55mm & 1:2.2 f=55mm (Sonnar), Takumars 1:1.8 f=58mm & 1:2.4 f=58mm, Takumar 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), Takumar 1:2.8/105 (Model II) Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:6.3/300
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses: Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMARs 1:4.5/20 & 1:3.5/24 & 1:2/35, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMARs 1:1.8/85, 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, & 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMARs 1:4/50 & 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100
Pentax K-Mount: SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm
Nikon: Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, Nikon NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Nikon Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, Nikon NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron: Tamron SP 51B 17mm f/3.5, Tamron SP 500mm f/8 (52BB), Tamron SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.8/35 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 5843 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:2 / 35
Bought at bargain price "for parts only" to fix "missing a screw" lens bought previously -- received in excellent condition! Oh darn, still looking for parts lens. LOL |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RokkorDoctor
 Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 418 Location: Kent, UK
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:2 / 35
Bought at bargain price "for parts only" to fix "missing a screw" lens bought previously -- received in excellent condition! Oh darn, still looking for parts lens. LOL |
That problem sounds very familiar to me!
I've given up on on trying to fix every lens I can; some cheap & abundantly available ones will be for parts even if they could be fixed with some effort... _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fotohelios
Joined: 01 Dec 2021 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fotohelios wrote:
i bought this lens. Very solid and excellent definition. He looked German but is Japanese instead. Anyone know her ??
do you understand the manufacturer from the serial number?

Last edited by fotohelios on Mon Jan 24, 2022 10:18 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fotohelios
Joined: 01 Dec 2021 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fotohelios wrote:
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D1N0
 Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 1758
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Cosina Like the Cosinon 50mm F1.8 _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KEO
 Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 577 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Yeah, it looks a lot like the Cosinon 50 1.8.
It should have super swirly bokeh. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fotohelios
Joined: 01 Dec 2021 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fotohelios wrote:
Good evening,
but
Is Edixa Japanese? I thought she was German .... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D1N0
 Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 1758
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
It was German but in the end they just were a company that ordered camera's from Cosina with their name on it. Or maybe some one bought their name. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caspert79
 Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 1744 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
This one was on my wish list for quite a while, and finally ordered it:
Olympus OM Zuiko 90mm f/2 macro. _________________ Currently for Sale:
- Tokyo Koki Vivitar 200mm f/3.5 (18 bl, M42)
- Kyoei Optical 135mm f/2.8 (EXA) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D1N0
 Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 1758
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Lucky find in the Panagor Project:
Panagor auto tele 400mm 1:5.6
Panagor Auto Tele 400mm 1:5.6 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Panagor Auto Tele 400mm 1:5.6 by The lens profile, on Flickr _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Doc Sharptail
 Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 439 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
Bell and Howell Lumina 80-250mm f4.5. in Nikon "F" mount.
I'll get photo's up later on tonight.
What's interesting about it is that it came out roughly the same time as the B&H FD-35, which was made by Canon.
Not sure who made this lens...
More later.
-D.S. _________________
D-810
50 f2 H nikkor, 28 f3.5 a/i, 50 f1.4 S.C., 85 f1.8 K, 105 f2.5 P, 135 f3.5 Q, 200 f4 Q.C.
50 f2 K, 50 f2 a/i, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hapgood
Joined: 14 Jan 2022 Posts: 17 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hapgood wrote:
Hello all! Hope everyone is having a good week.
Took a gamble on a few low-information (but low-cost) eBay listings last week and have been very pleased with the condition once they arrived.
A Vivitar 100mm 2.8 in F-mount
and, a
Converto Tamron 135mm 2.8 with original matched converter lens, Exacta mount ring and brown leather case. (I wish it had the original M42 ring as that would be far more convenient for adapting, but oh well).
Both have crystal clear optics and honestly appear almost new. The preset 12-blade aperture on the Tamron is a lovely thing indeed!
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevemark
 Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 2648 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Nothing special at all, just a nice and well made tele lens from the 1970s:
It's in a pretty nice condition - no damages, no fungus, aperture working, and smooth focusing -, and i'll have some spare time to play around with it tomorrow. CHF (USD / EUR) 2.-- including original caps ...
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vivaldibow
 Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 749
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Congrats. It looks like the Vivitar was taken by you. I placed an intial bid, just hoping to get it in the end, as
I wasn't too serious. The Tamron dual is very cool as well. I got my copy shipped from Europe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 5843 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
Nothing special at all, just a nice and well made tele lens from the 1970s:
It's in a pretty nice condition - no damages, no fungus, aperture working, and smooth focusing -, and i'll have some spare time to play around with it tomorrow. CHF (USD / EUR) 2.-- including original caps ...
S |
Canon FD lenses are quite beautifully made.
The Canon FDn 4/200 is quite exceptional but is a different design to this one.
I am interested to see how this one performs. Evidently there were two variations - one with SSC coatings - 1973 onwards - and an earlier one without SSC - 1971-73
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevemark
 Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 2648 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Canon FD lenses are quite beautifully made. |
Yes ... but often at least slightly fogged (this one as well). And then there's the issue with the bearings in many FD/nFD lenses (usually in zooms and IF / floating element lenses, but also in "high quality" primes without IF / floating elements, e. g. the FD 2.8/300mm Fluorite).
Oldhand wrote: |
The Canon FDn 4/200 is quite exceptional but is a different design to this one.
|
Yes, optically an excellent design, mechanically less so - the said bearings are gone in most samples you'll find on the market ...
Oldhand wrote: |
I am interested to see how this one performs. Evidently there were two variations - one with SSC coatings - 1973 onwards - and an earlier one without SSC - 1971-73
Tom |
Me too! - I have been fiddling around with my first (non-SSC) FD 4/200mm when I got it some years ago, but didn't really use it since it was fogged. The "new" sample i got today is SSC coated and very slightly fogged as well - which will be visible in backlight, but probably not in "ordinary" landscapes. I'll take my "new" SSC sample with me tomorrow, shooting a bit before cleaning it later in the day.
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mr_tibbs2004
 Joined: 23 Jul 2021 Posts: 73 Location: United States
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mr_tibbs2004 wrote:
Super-Takumar 105mm f2.8. This lens has been on my wanted list for a while now. Looks like I received a good copy! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 9220 Location: California
Expire: 2021-06-22
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
mr_tibbs2004 wrote: |
Super-Takumar 105mm f2.8. This lens has been on my wanted list for a while now. Looks like I received a good copy! |
Which version? Check using serial number at:
https://takumarguide.weebly.com/1--28--105-350-43500.html
or
https://takumarguide.weebly.com/1--28--105-43501.html _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
http://tinyurl.com/bgaho3q
Cameras: Sony A7Rii, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses: Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, Super-TAKUMAR 1:2/35 (Fat), Super-TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Auto-Takumars 1:2 f=55mm & 1:2.2 f=55mm (Sonnar), Takumars 1:1.8 f=58mm & 1:2.4 f=58mm, Takumar 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), Takumar 1:2.8/105 (Model II) Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:6.3/300
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses: Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMARs 1:4.5/20 & 1:3.5/24 & 1:2/35, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMARs 1:1.8/85, 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, & 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMARs 1:4/50 & 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100
Pentax K-Mount: SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm
Nikon: Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, Nikon NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Nikon Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, Nikon NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron: Tamron SP 51B 17mm f/3.5, Tamron SP 500mm f/8 (52BB), Tamron SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.8/35 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hapgood
Joined: 14 Jan 2022 Posts: 17 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
hapgood wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Congrats. It looks like the Vivitar was taken by you. I placed an intial bid, just hoping to get it in the end, as
I wasn't too serious. The Tamron dual is very cool as well. I got my copy shipped from Europe. |
Thanks! I always worry about who I'm bidding against in situations like that. If I decide to part with the Vivitar in the future, I'll let you know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vivaldibow
 Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 749
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
hapgood wrote: |
Thanks! I always worry about who I'm bidding against in situations like that. If I decide to part with the Vivitar in the future, I'll let you know. |
Thanks, no worry. I already got a copy. It is really nice to see such a pristine vintage lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Doc Sharptail
 Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 439 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
Here is the lens mentioned earlier today.
Please excuse the hurried phone pictures.
A twin-ring constant aperture zoom
The orange, red, and white markings are kind of nice.
It cost me all of $20.00 Canadian.
A bit dusty on the inside with 3 fairly large particles, and a bit of "haze".
I don't see any fungus spots.
Mount is a pre-a/i nikon f. This is the first 3rd party pre-a/i lens that has given me trouble.
It went on the D-810 with little trouble, but getting it dis-mounted was another story.
I had to pull the battery out of the camera in order for the lens to release.
I won't be putting it back on anytime soon- it will still make a good toy for my older film cameras.
I took a couple of hurried quick frames while it was monunted, and have yet to examine them.
Not expecting much, based on what I saw through the viewfinder.
-D.S. _________________
D-810
50 f2 H nikkor, 28 f3.5 a/i, 50 f1.4 S.C., 85 f1.8 K, 105 f2.5 P, 135 f3.5 Q, 200 f4 Q.C.
50 f2 K, 50 f2 a/i, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mr_tibbs2004
 Joined: 23 Jul 2021 Posts: 73 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
mr_tibbs2004 wrote:
Second version apparently, thanks for the easy look up! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
benadamx
 Joined: 25 Feb 2019 Posts: 326
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
benadamx wrote:
won this on ebay a few weeks ago and then basically forgot about it while it shipped from japan: a (kenko?) Dream Soft Lens 100mm f2.2 with the added bonus of a kenko eyepiece adapter in OM mount (and a T2-OM adapter between them)
.. design is similar to a spiratone portragon - two elements, each fixed at either end of the barrel, but the elements are larger and so far i find the results a bit more pleasing
the eyepiece adapter is of course almost useless with the dream soft lens, but coupled with the OM 50mm/f3.5 macro i had sitting on the desk already, it's pretty good for watching birds at the feeder in my yard
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|