View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
john_
Joined: 07 Dec 2014 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
john_ wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
john_ wrote: |
The priorities are in this order: looks, build quality, optical performance. |
If that's the case, why not buy the sexiest-looking lens you can find which has fungus or haze or something else wrong with it? It would
be relatively cheap and just think how good you'd feel flashing your expensive-looking lens around. Nobody would know it doesn't work. |
Did I say that the optical performance does not matter? I don't think so. I knew this post would attract some amount of trolling but I didn't expect it to come from a mod
Thanks everyone else for your suggestions.
In case anyone else is interested, a few other not-super-expensive lenses that I guess would meet the points good looking and good build quality (and at least very usable optical performance). I think the former two aren't unknown. Didn't know about the last one though:
C-summicron 40 f2
M-Rokkor 40 f2
Avenon 28 f3.5 http://www.taunusreiter.de/Cameras/Avenon.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7553 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
You might need a good-looking adapter too.
Click here to see on Ebay _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
john_ wrote: |
In case anyone else is interested, a few other not-super-expensive lenses that I guess would meet the points good looking and good build quality (and at least very usable optical performance). I think the former two aren't unknown. Didn't know about the last one though:
C-summicron 40 f2
M-Rokkor 40 f2
Avenon 28 f3.5 http://www.taunusreiter.de/Cameras/Avenon.html |
well, also the concept of "cheapest" now becomes questionable... all of them are at least ten times more expensive than an Industar . At this point, add also Canon Serenar and Voigtlander Heliar, Color Skopar...
Anyway, thanks for the last suggestion, I did not know the brand (not particularly good looking but interesting, sort of pancake). _________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
john_
Joined: 07 Dec 2014 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
john_ wrote:
enzodm wrote: |
john_ wrote: |
In case anyone else is interested, a few other not-super-expensive lenses that I guess would meet the points good looking and good build quality (and at least very usable optical performance). I think the former two aren't unknown. Didn't know about the last one though:
C-summicron 40 f2
M-Rokkor 40 f2
Avenon 28 f3.5 http://www.taunusreiter.de/Cameras/Avenon.html |
well, also the concept of "cheapest" now becomes questionable... all of them are at least ten times more expensive than an Industar . At this point, add also Canon Serenar and Voigtlander Heliar, Color Skopar...
Anyway, thanks for the last suggestion, I did not know the brand (not particularly good looking but interesting, sort of pancake). |
The black one not so much. But I think the silver one looks quite good:
http://mail.holidays.net/store/img-large/avenon-28mm-f-3-5-lens-leica-l39-screw-excellent-ku87_261559219909.jpg
Generally, at least where I am, Serenars in good condition seem to be very rare. Same for the Russian lenses. Or they end up being almost as expensive as the 'better' ones. Maybe one has to be very patient. Where do you guys find all those cheap Russian lenses? Offers on Evilbay seem to be either in a poor condition or overpriced (or both). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014 Posts: 617 Location: Troy, MI USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
newst wrote:
[quote="john_"][quote="enzodm"]
john_ wrote: |
...Generally, at least where I am, Serenars in good condition seem to be very rare. Same for the Russian lenses. Or they end up being almost as expensive as the 'better' ones. Maybe one has to be very patient. Where do you guys find all those cheap Russian lenses? Offers on Evilbay seem to be either in a poor condition or overpriced (or both). |
On Ebay US, while the Serenar's aren't very common, the Canon LTM lenses in most focal lengths are pretty common. You need to take your time though as the prices vary considerably.
The LTM pancake Industars I have seen have all been junk (although their M42 cousins will work at least). I do have two of the larger Industar 61s (52 and 55mm) in LTM that are attractive in black and chrome, in great condition and quite functional (though nowhere near the best 50mm lenses available). The lenses set me back $30.00 ea on Ebay. _________________ Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Nikkor 35mm f/2.5 is a jewel, but maybe not cheap enough. Another very nice lens is the PEN F 40mm f/1.4 which has good IQ too. Can you say something about budget?
Click here to see on Ebay
Click here to see on Ebay _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
rokkor 40/2
DSC01580-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
nikkor 5cm f/1.4
DSC01569-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
Canon 50/1.2
DSC01522-2 by unoh7, on Flickr
28 cron:
crony by unoh7, on Flickr
1937 jena
DSC02414 by unoh7, on Flickr
CV 35/1.4
DSC05768 by unoh7, on Flickr
5cm Red Dial
DSC08945 by unoh7, on Flickr
They all look pretty good to me _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
The Canon 50/1.2 looks and feels like it was designed for my A7r.
The Canon 50/1.5 is one of the toughest Canon lenses to find with no issues, haze being far too common.
On the other hand, the 35/2.8 seems to rarely have issues from the many examples I've seen. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
john_
Joined: 07 Dec 2014 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
john_ wrote:
uhoh7 wrote: |
They all look pretty good to me |
Wow, that's an impressive collection. Thanks everyone, I think I got enough suggestions and will now go on standby for deals |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 961 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
Black barrel Jupiter 8. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
Oh, one more of the 1937 Zeiss Jena 5cm f/1.5
DSC06958 by unoh7, on Flickr
You can find these in Contax mount for 150USD easily.
it's no slouch, here right out of M9 with no edit:
jena blue by unoh7, on Flickr _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 942 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
Mos6502 wrote: |
Black barrel Jupiter 8. |
Yes it is cute on the A7 . I paid mine 15 euros and it is ok from 2.8 in the center. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|