Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Wartime built Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135/4
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:52 am    Post subject: Wartime built Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135/4 Reply with quote

At a local fair I managed to find a CZJ Triotar 135/4 that from the serial number seems produced in 1942-43. It's, of course, in exa mount (it was for the Kine Exakta) and since the m42 postwar copy I already owned is such a lovely lens I was very curious how this one would behave.

Ok, I have confirmation now that the Triotar is one of my best 3D effect lenses.



More on my blog http://foodografia.blogspot.com/2009/06/carl-zeiss-jena-triotar-1354.html


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Simply.....GREAT! Shocked


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh Wow, that looks wonderful.

What a find!

If you need to pass on the m42 version... I am here for you Smile


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 6:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My best lenses are the Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 and the Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135/4.

I hold the Triotar even above the Sonnar 135/3.5.
The only problem with them is, that they are sometimes stiff in manual focusing.
I am happy to own a copy which was professionally restored.
But my other - stiff - copy is nevertheless usable.


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just lovely.


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really great. Is it taken at f/4, or stopped down?


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

no-X wrote:
Really great. Is it taken at f/4, or stopped down?


Wide open (and ISO 1000 but that's 5dmkII merit)


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Awesome photo, I really like that a lot. Very Happy


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder why Zeiss didn't manufacture shorter triotars for SLRs, too. There is 85/4 Triotar for rangefinders, but I've never seen SLR version. It's quite strange, because there were many different lens models for other focal lengths (e.g. for 50mm: tessar 40/4.5, tessar 50/3.5, tessar 50/2.8, biotar 58/2 and later 3 panoclars instead of the biotar), but for 75-100mm, there was only expensive Biotar 75/1.5 and Biometar 80/2.8...


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wow! great colors and bokeh, impressive!


PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

no-X wrote:
I wonder why Zeiss didn't manufacture shorter triotars for SLRs, too. There is 85/4 Triotar for rangefinders, but I've never seen SLR version. It's quite strange, because there were many different lens models for other focal lengths (e.g. for 50mm: tessar 40/4.5, tessar 50/3.5, tessar 50/2.8, biotar 58/2 and later 3 panoclars instead of the biotar), but for 75-100mm, there was only expensive Biotar 75/1.5 and Biometar 80/2.8...


They made Triotar 80mm to be mounted on the first Rolleicord (I own one).

I suspect is a matter of coperture, the 135 I have don't have any problem at the borders on full frame either also at full wide aperture. So I think it covers far more than 35mm., a 50 mm probably would present unsharp and aberrated corners just like for example the Meyer Trioplan. My guess is that it would have been unacceptable by Zeiss standards.