View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3071 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 2:13 pm Post subject: Voigtlander Vito CLR questions |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
I thinking of buying a fixed lens rangefinder and I wondering if someone has experience
with the Voigtländer Vito CLR? Also is it better to buy one with the Color Lanthar or Color Skopar (both f2.
lens? Thanks.
......I wrote 2.8, but it came out as a smiley face. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
Color Skopar is 4-glass 'Tessar' type; Color Lanthar is 3-element 'Cooke triplet'. I have a Vito with a Skopar and it's a nice lens. But if you're making colour prints I doubt you'll see much, if any, any difference. _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3071 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
scsambrook wrote: |
Color Skopar is 4-glass 'Tessar' type; Color Lanthar is 3-element 'Cooke triplet'. I have a Vito with a Skopar and it's a nice lens. But if you're making colour prints I doubt you'll see much, if any, any difference. |
Thank you. Do you have the CLR or a different model? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
I have the Vito B with the big 1:1 viewfinder and the f3.5 Color Skopar. Actually, it's my wife's camera which I got for her when we got engaged . . . a while ago now If you shoot slides you could possibly see a difference between the two lenses, if you have a projector with a top-class lens. Properly exposed Kodachromes from 'mine' really can't be distinguished from those shot with the 50mm Elmar I had back then.
I can't recall if the early 'solid' Vito cameras had their lenses in helical focusing mounts or if they were front-cell focusing like the later 'square' models. Front cell focusers are often alleged to suffer as the camera-subject setting decreases but I'm not sure how serious an issue that is. _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Hi.
I had the CLR with the skopar 2,8/50 for years.
Don't use it wide open, the focus is moving the frontal element, so you change the FL to focus and that is seeing in the image. And the selenium almost sure doesn't work properly.
From F/8 has good IQ and the best bet is F/16.
The rendering of that lens is different to the SRL skopar 2,8/50.
If I want to buy a RF, should look for another cam, like the Olympus, canon, yashica (the Minister and the 35 electronic series are very good), konica (you have among the S series the IIIS and the S with 5 elements lens very sharp, and the S2 with a 6 elements lens, after those, the S3 which is a different cam, etc.), I actually have a Minolta AL, a good one.
If you want to have a Voigtlander perhaps to look for the Vito CS is the best way. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3071 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
papasito wrote: |
Hi.
I had the CLR with the skopar 2,8/50 for years.
Don't use it wide open, the focus is moving the frontal element, so you change the FL to focus and that is seeing in the image. And the selenium almost sure doesn't work properly.
From F/8 has good IQ and the best bet is F/16.
The rendering of that lens is different to the SRL skopar 2,8/50.
If I want to buy a RF, should look for another cam, like the Olympus, canon, yashica (the Minister and the 35 electronic series are very good), konica (you have among the S series the IIIS and the S with 5 elements lens very sharp, and the S2 with a 6 elements lens, after those, the S3 which is a different cam, etc.), I actually have a Minolta AL, a good one.
If you want to have a Voigtlander perhaps to look for the Vito CS is the best way. |
Thanks for this information, because you have used this camera. I was also thinking of buying a Minister D rangefinder. Is there any special advantage to the Vito CS over the CLR? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
uddhava wrote: |
papasito wrote: |
Hi.
I had the CLR with the skopar 2,8/50 for years.
Don't use it wide open, the focus is moving the frontal element, so you change the FL to focus and that is seeing in the image. And the selenium almost sure doesn't work properly.
From F/8 has good IQ and the best bet is F/16.
The rendering of that lens is different to the SRL skopar 2,8/50.
If I want to buy a RF, should look for another cam, like the Olympus, canon, yashica (the Minister and the 35 electronic series are very good), konica (you have among the S series the IIIS and the S with 5 elements lens very sharp, and the S2 with a 6 elements lens, after those, the S3 which is a different cam, etc.), I actually have a Minolta AL, a good one.
If you want to have a Voigtlander perhaps to look for the Vito CS is the best way. |
Thanks for this information, because you have used this camera. I was also thinking of buying a Minister D rangefinder. Is there any special advantage to the Vito CS over the CLR? |
The main differences between the Vito CS and the CSR versions are that the R stands for coupled rangefinder distance metering in the viewer, whereas with the CS you have to judge yourself and set the average distance on the lens.
I've now spotted a Vitoret DR for very little money and bought it. It will most probably arrive next week.
That maybe also an option for you. The main differences between the more expensive Vito and the reasonable Vitoret (both R versions in square form opposed to the older round shapes) are:
Vitoret doesn't need a battery as it is equipped with a selenium light meter opposite to Vito which is equipped with a CdS metering with battery instead.
Shutter speed: Vito: 1/500 and Vitoret only 1/300.
Slightly different mechanism for rewinding the film, but that has no real practical impact.
Vito shows light metering in the viewer and Vitoret only on top of the camera, whereas the luxury version of the Vitoret (called LR instead) would also offer this feature.
Actually both cameras are coming with the same lenses, either the Lanthar or the Skopar. The Lanthar is a 3 lens type whereas all 6 surfaces of the 3 lenses are fully coated for better colors and to minimize CA's.
So for the lens quality it doesn't make any difference which model you take. However, in terms of availability, price and usage I would rather recommend the Vitoret DR or LR instead. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3071 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2015 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Thank you. I was also looking at a Vitoret DR. It is going for $18, but to be honest my interest in a fixed lens rangefinder has run out of steam for now. I will be interested to hear about your results though. I have been thinking to buy a folding 35mm rangefinder or folding viewfinder camera. I have a lot of film cameras considering how much film I am shooting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2015 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
uddhava wrote: |
Thank you. I was also looking at a Vitoret DR. It is going for $18, but to be honest my interest in a fixed lens rangefinder has run out of steam for now. I will be interested to hear about your results though. I have been thinking to buy a folding 35mm rangefinder or folding viewfinder camera. I have a lot of film cameras considering how much film I am shooting. |
Well, I am in a comparable situation.
It was just an opportunity for little money. Another camera which most likely will collect dust as the main purpose.
Pathological collector's syndrome.
However, if I find some energy to shoot a roll of film and to scan it afterwards I'll certainly post some examples here.....
BTW, if you are looking for some help on Voigtländer stuff I can certainly help you further. I'm very good equipped with all the necessary books. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
Thomas - could you possibly list those books? I know they'll be in German but I may be able to get hold of some of them in the UK once I know their details.
Sorry for diverting the thread . . . _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
scsambrook wrote: |
Thomas - could you possibly list those books? I know they'll be in German but I may be able to get hold of some of them in the UK once I know their details.
Sorry for diverting the thread . . . |
I think I've done that before. However, here again:
http://goo.gl/nTvy3u
http://goo.gl/UW3GLR
http://goo.gl/I87Vgg
FYI, Claus Prochnow (the author) used to work for Franke & Heidecke (Rollei) 1955-1991 in the development department and was therefore able to use the original documents from Voigtländer when Rollei took over the Voigtländer company from Zeiss. I think there is no better source than that. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|