View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 9:33 pm Post subject: Vintage Primes Between 58 and 85 |
|
|
KEO wrote:
I have this large gap in my primes, and I'm interested in bridging it. If anyone has any favorites to suggest, I'd be most grateful.
Any lenses in that range are welcome, but I would say I have a heightened interest in the 70-75mm range.
Let's put a loose price ceiling around $500; I probably wouldn't spend that much (or I'd just get a Voigtlander Heliar Classic 75), but you never know what you might find at a garage sale or a flea market, so I don't mind being made aware.
Thank you in advance! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Raxar
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:10 pm Post subject: Re: Vintage Primes Between 58 and 85 |
|
|
Raxar wrote:
KEO wrote: |
I have this large gap in my primes, and I'm interested in bridging it. If anyone has any favorites to suggest, I'd be most grateful.
Any lenses in that range are welcome, but I would say I have a heightened interest in the 70-75mm range.
Let's put a loose price ceiling around $500; I probably wouldn't spend that much (or I'd just get a Voigtlander Heliar Classic 75), but you never know what you might find at a garage sale or a flea market, so I don't mind being made aware.
Thank you in advance! |
are looking for sharpness or character? Noritar 80/2 is a hell of lens but its not that sharp! but you can use it on any system (even GFX) and has a unique render. of course its sharper than most 6x6 lens but its not comparable to some eyeball scratching ones. nest best thing in that class would be mamiya 80/1.9. pentacon 80/1.8 is more likely a collectible item and its not in your price range.
if you consider macro (usuallly f/2.8 ) as a option you could get kyocera 60/2.8 but it needs a adapter with diagram lever and you will be limited to mirrorless.
cMount lens are good but they have crapy corner! but they fit in your preferred focal range as they usually are 70~75mm.
APS-C lens are usually not that good and also expensive! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
You cannot do better than the Zeiss Biotar 75/1.5, but thats out of your price range.
Your requirement is a bit unusual. There aren't a lot of lenses in that range because there doesn't seem to have ever been much demand for it. Indeed, those that are in that range are usually there for technical reasons, because it is easier to adapt a given optical formula, such as the case with Zeiss where they just made a bigger Biotar. Or for that matter all those 55-58mm lenses exist because at one time it was easier to achieve that than 50mm at those apertures, for SLRs with their back focus issues.
Even 50mm is a bit of a compromise as the preferred "normal" is usually wider than that. Old fixed lens rangefinders for instance took advantage of their shorter back focus with typically 38-45mm double gauss lenses, not the normal slr kit lens 50-55mm.
Anyway, one of the few other lenses made for 35mm SLRs in that range is the 60mm f/2.8 Tomioka preset macro, most often found as a Mamiya/Sekor or Yashinon.
The normal lenses for 6x4.5 aka 645 format medium format slrs are often 75mm, typically f/2.8. Pentax and Bronica for instance. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Thanks, guys!
If I find a Biotar 75mm at a garage sale, I'll be sure to snap it up! I've seen how expensive they are. Pancolar and Pentacon 80 as well...
Noritar 80/2, huh? That's one I'll check out.
The Heliar Classic 75mm actually seems like a pretty good deal given the prices in this focal range. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
The only lens in this focal length range I own is the Voigtlaender Color Heliar 75mm/F2.5 in M39/LTM.
I've introduced it here: http://forum.mflenses.com/voigtlander-color-heliar-75mm-f2-5-m39-ltm-t72616.html
It's a really excellent lens and therefore strongly recommended. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10539 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
You mean between 55 and 85 inclusive?
M42 Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:1.8/85 _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Yes, that's one to consider! Thanks.
visualopsins wrote: |
You mean between 55 and 85 inclusive?
M42 Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:1.8/85 |
I'm not going to be strict, but let's say exclusive. I already know quite a lot about 58s and 85s, since I have several of each. I'd love a Takumar 85 1.8 though. That's on my long-term list. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2491
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Maybe there aren't so many lenses in that range. Pentax has two but they are both AF The DA limited 70mm f2.4 (also no aperture ring) and the FA 77mm F1.8 Limited. (with aperture ring). _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
The Pentax 70mm is APS-C
It’s a fine lens and extremely compact.
It’s like the 105mm of the current range.
The 77mm is full frame and legendary, at least in Pentax-world. It does not look like an AF lens but it is of course. Prices run around $500.
You probably could adapt the 77mm with a normal PK adapter because it has the aperture ring. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 515 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
Right at the 85mm "top limit", but a bit unusual ... the Fujinon 85mm f/4 "Soft Focus", mine's in 42-screw.
The Schneider-Kreuznach 85mm f/4 Tele-Arton. Mine's ex-Retina so it's in "DKL" mount and used with an adaptor but it was probably available in other contemporary mounts. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Carl Zeiss Jena f2.8/70mm TEVIDON (but might not cover your sensor fully I fear...)
Some of my results with it: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums/72157626556909405 _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Like you, KEO, I also have a gap in my primes between 55mm and 85mm. But I have truly great 55mm and 85mm primes, so to be honest, I haven't worried about that gap too much. Instead, I have some excellent zooms that can take up the slack, when I do have that uncommon situation where I'll need a focal length between these two extremes, probably the best of which is my Vivitar S1 28-90/2.8-3.5, a lens that has always rivaled primes in performance for me. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2491
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
The Pentax 70mm is APS-C
It’s a fine lens and extremely compact.
It’s like the 105mm of the current range.
|
But it covers a FF image circle. There are adapters that can operate mechanical aperture of aperture ring less lenses (no click stops so it will be a bit off guess work). It is a modern lens, without built in motor or focus by wire so it can be used manually. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
You could try the CZJ Biometar 80mm F2.8 originally used by the Pentacon Six. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ernst Dinkla
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 378
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ernst Dinkla wrote:
Sigma 70mm 2.8 macro available in several mounts. There is a new version so the former one could be called vintage. There is a switch to true manual on it. Excellent for infinity too, good bokeh on top. Big though so not my choice to fill that Gap. I have yet to find a solution. Several expensive ciné lenses with that focal length too.
Salvaged 75mm lenses from 6x6 camera's, including folder camera's. The Mamiya 70mm for 645, has a shutter though. _________________ Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst
http://www.pigment-print.com/spectralplots/spectrumviz_1.htm
March 2017 update, 750+ inkjet media white spectral plots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Great suggestions, Friends! Thanks.
I'm taking notes.
There's also the mysterious preset aperture Takumar 83mm 1.8, but that's a collector item and too close to 85mm.
Nice images. I'd never even heard of that one before. I'll look into it. Thanks.
cooltouch wrote: |
Instead, I have some excellent zooms that can take up the slack, |
That's a valid approach. I don't have any zooms below 80mm, but I'll check out the Vivitar. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Leica R 60 /2.8 Macro It's a great walk-around lens, it's sharp at all focus distances.
CZJ 80/2.8 Biometar and it's cheaper sibling, the CZJ 80/2.8 Tessar which I have, both available in M42 and Exakta.
http://forum.mflenses.com/more-people-here-with-a-czj-biometar-2-8-80-t79038.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/carl-zeiss-jena-tessar-80-2-8-exa-mount-t19529.html _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
KEO wrote: |
cooltouch wrote: |
Instead, I have some excellent zooms that can take up the slack, |
That's a valid approach. I don't have any zooms below 80mm, but I'll check out the Vivitar. Thanks. |
Sure. Use the search tool here and you'll get a bunch of hits on the S1 28-90. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Raxar
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Raxar wrote:
CZJ tessar 80/2.8 is also available in P6 mount. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bror_svensson
Joined: 26 Mar 2015 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bror_svensson wrote:
pen f 60mm 1.5 is a great lens that covers full frame even though its and half frame lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Antoine
Joined: 08 Jan 2016 Posts: 298 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Antoine wrote:
Minolta Rokkor varisoft 85mm f2.8 is also an original candidate. Especially for portraits... _________________ Antoine
Sony A6000 APS-C and Sony A7 Rii
Minolta Fisheye MD Rokkor 7.5 mm f4, Fisheye MD 16 f2.8 MD R 17mm f4, MD R 20mm f2.8, MC VFC & MDIII 24mm f2.8, MD 28mm f2.0 &3.5, MD II 35mm 1.8, MD 45mm f2.0, MD 50mm f 1.2 & MD I f1.4, MC PG 58mm 1.2, MD 85mm f2.0, MD R 85mm f2.8 Varisoft, MC 85mm f1.7 MD R 100mm f2.5, MD R 100mm f4.0 macro, MD III 135mm f2.8, MD R 200mm f2.8 & 4.0, RF 250mm f5.6, MD 300mm f4.5, MD APO 400 mm f5.6, RF 500mm f8.0, RF 800mm f8.0 *2 300-s and 300-l
100 mm f4 macro bellows (5/4)
Vivitar 17mm f3.5, Elicar 300mm mirror f5.6, Zhongi turbo ii
Sigma 16mm f 2.8 fish eye
Zooms:24-50 mm f4, 35-70 mm f3.5 macro, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5, 50-135 f 3.5, 70-210 f4 and MD APO 100-500 mm f8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Ernst Dinkla wrote: |
Sigma 70mm 2.8 macro available in several mounts. There is a new version so the former one could be called vintage. There is a switch to true manual on it. Excellent for infinity too, good bokeh on top. |
Thanks, I'll take a look!
bror_svensson wrote: |
pen f 60mm 1.5 is a great lens that covers full frame even though its and half frame lens |
Another one I'll check out. Thanks.
Lightshow wrote: |
Leica R 60 /2.8 Macro It's a great walk-around lens, it's sharp at all focus distances.
CZJ 80/2.8 Biometar and it's cheaper sibling, the CZJ 80/2.8 Tessar which I have, both available in M42 and Exakta. |
80mm Tessar is not a lens I've ever considered, so I'll investigate that one too (and the Leica you suggest). Thanks.
If I missed thanking anyone...thanks! I'll be researching these lenses for a few days at least. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
folderholder
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 102 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2018 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
folderholder wrote:
75-80mm is the normal focal length for medium format cameras. There are some outstanding older lenses from Zeiss, Nikon, Mamiya, etc. that can be adapted to digital cameras. Even on full frame only the central part of the image circle gets used with these. OTOH, they are larger and heavier than most 35mm lenses. _________________ Best wishes,
Peter
www.pandacollector.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2018 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
How about enlarger lenses? Stupidly cheap and sharp. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gardener
Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2018 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
Obviously, anyone who has not pre-ordered 75mm Noctilux is less than a man. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|