View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wolan
Joined: 30 Jun 2015 Posts: 576 Location: Zurich
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 12:44 pm Post subject: Vintage lenses for BW photography |
|
|
wolan wrote:
Hi,
do you think there are vintage MF lenses which are more suitable then others for BW photography? And why?
By the way, not long ago I have read an article praising a Voigtlander lens (I think in Leica mount) as the go-to lens for BW photographers, do you have an idea which lens he was talking about (I cannot find the article)?
Thank you. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/149089857@N03/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
I think B&W is less critical to certain aspects of a lens, such as contrast, color fringing, etc.
But in general, I would simply use a lens that you like using in the focal length of your choice.
This being said, I've been shooting B&W almost exclusively for the past 6 months (with the Monochrom, a camera that doesn't register colours)
My lens of choice has been the Jupiter-3 (the J8 is almost as good, and considerably cheaper)
In 35mm FL, I was pleasantly surprised by the tiny Leitz Summaron 35mm f/3.5, and as a tele, I found a very good copy of the Jupiter-9 (85mm 2.0) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Seele
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 741 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seele wrote:
Wolan,
Are you talking about b/w film? An inherently high-contrast lens might be technically correct, but there is a chance for losing some of the shadow details on b/w film. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wolan
Joined: 30 Jun 2015 Posts: 576 Location: Zurich
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wolan wrote:
Seele wrote: |
Wolan,
Are you talking about b/w film? An inherently high-contrast lens might be technically correct, but there is a chance for losing some of the shadow details on b/w film. |
I shoot with a modern mirrorless camera.
Thanks. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/149089857@N03/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MMouse
Joined: 18 Apr 2018 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MMouse wrote:
Voigtlander has some single coated lenses.
They are supposed to be less contrasty and better in b&w, don't know if the difference is that obvious. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
Seele wrote: |
Wolan,
Are you talking about b/w film? An inherently high-contrast lens might be technically correct, but there is a chance for losing some of the shadow details on b/w film. |
It depends... we might argue that historically, lenses from the B&W-era had lower contrast and are therefore "correct"
But I think it depends mostly on the look we are after. Both low-contrast and high-contrast lenses can work well in digital B&W. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
My favorite lenses for B&W pics are
Canon FL and FD
Minolta MC
Leica M
In the cheap way, I love the rendering of the Pentacon MC 50 F/1,8 in B&W
And the Adams teaching:
The shadow with minimal detail, must be in Zone 3. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
When I shoot B&W I prefer high-contrast images, so naturally the lenses I prefer are ones that can produce high contrast images. This gives one a host of possibilities to choose from, but that's where I would start.
Most of my shooting experience is with Canon and Nikon -- and also Tamron -- in both color and B&W. And my B&W is 35mm film, in this case. Usually Tri-X or Plus-X Pan. As to which focal lengths I prefer -- that's a tough call. Even zooms can provide the high contrast i prefer. So I guess I'll say that most any lens made by those three manufacturers should work well for B&W work. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 514 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
I think the single lens that gave me the most satisfaction when shooting with b&w film was the Tessar fitted to my Contaflex 1, non-interchangeable in a leaf shutter. For whatever reason there seemed to be more shadow detail AND more highlight detail than any other lens I'd tried.
Time passed, that camera got sold and the nearest I ever managed to subsequently find was the Industar-50!
Doubtless there are "sharper" lenses, obviously there are wider-aperture lenses, but for that overall "something" in a monochrome landscape, a Tessar-formula lens, closed down a couple of stops, did it for me every time
Obviously YMMV |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
The best is subjective. I like high contrast images for B&W, but I also like the older lenses that have a vintage look and character. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|