View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 255 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2021 6:50 pm Post subject: Carl Zeiss Jena 25mm/1.4 Biotar adapted to M4/3 |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
Hi All,
This is a topic on request: http://forum.mflenses.com/posting,mode,quote,p,1550238.html
Yesterday I took delivery of a Carl Zeiss Jena 25mm f1.4 Biotar lens that originally had a pentaflex 16 mount. The eBay seller modifies these to M4/3 mount. This intrigued me so I decided to pick one up. The serial number dates it to 1962-ish.
So yes, it does have some hard vignetting in the corners since the lens is intended for a 16mm movie camera and a M4/3 sensor is 21.6) mm across. No amount of stopping down resolves that. But I think it also means that the lens is actually wider than 25mm (about 18.5 by my math?), so room to crop down.
The lens has also been serviced and regreased. Smooth as silk. The first thing I tried was one of my standard sharpness and contrast tests where I take a series of pictures of a building about 750 meters away with apertures from wide open to usually about f11. My initial impression is that even wide open at 1.4 it is sharp with fairly decent contrast. Stop it down 1 stop and contrast improves considerably. I am really impressed.
First picture shows the lens on my E-M5 Mk.II (taken with an E-M1 Mk.II and an OM 50mm 3.5 macro).
Second pic shows the vignetting. The frame of that picture is 85.5 wide, I was about 3 meters away.
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16554 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
if you go for the 1.4/50mm then there is no vignetting anymore, but is a bit more costly.
I have both and actually 2x of the 50mm, as it is sooo good! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
Last edited by kds315* on Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:25 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 255 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2021 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
if you go for the 1.4/50mm then there is no vignetting anymore, but is a bit more costly.
I have both and actually 2x of the 50mm, as it is sooo good! |
How do you adapt these lenses? I mean, I have one so I know it can be done. But when searching eBay for Pentaflex 16 to MFT (or variations thereof) it turns up nothing.
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RnR
Joined: 11 Jul 2012 Posts: 283 Location: Brisbane, Australia
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2021 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RnR wrote:
connloyalist wrote: |
How do you adapt these lenses? I mean, I have one so I know it can be done. But when searching eBay for Pentaflex 16 to MFT (or variations thereof) it turns up nothing. |
I found this item - https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Pentaflex-AK16-lens-to-Micro-4-3-adapter-Olympus-OM-D-Lumix-GH5-Blackmagic-BMPCC/193870350438
I do like your adapter. Looks very neat with the OMD and the lens
_________________ Currently shooting with Fuji X-E2s + Metabones Speedbooster + m42 and CY glass 💕
Cheers, Hasse |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Miles Teg
Joined: 11 Apr 2013 Posts: 65
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2021 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Miles Teg wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
if you go for the 1.4/50mm then there is no vignetting anymore, but is a bit more costly.
I have both and actually 2x of the 50mm, as it is sooo good! |
My sample of the 1.4/50 mm Biotar was nowhere as good as the 1.4/25 mm. The latter is very sharp, even wide open. You have to crop the dark corners or use it after sunset, but I would prefer it over my 1.4/50 mm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 Posts: 255 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
connloyalist wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
if you go for the 1.4/50mm then there is no vignetting anymore, but a bit more costly.
I have both and actually 2x of the 50mm, as it is sooo good! |
Following up on my own topic. Kds, you said the 50mm doesn't vignette anymore. Does that imply that the shorter the focal length the more vignetting, and the longer the focal length the less vignetting with these lenses?
In other words, a Pentaxflex AK16 12.5mm lens (which exists) would vignette more than my 25mm lens?
Regards, C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16554 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
connloyalist wrote: |
kds315* wrote: |
if you go for the 1.4/50mm then there is no vignetting anymore, but a bit more costly.
I have both and actually 2x of the 50mm, as it is sooo good! |
Following up on my own topic. Kds, you said the 50mm doesn't vignette anymore. Does that imply that the shorter the focal length the more vignetting, and the longer the focal length the less vignetting with these lenses?
In other words, a Pentaxflex AK16 12.5mm lens (which exists) would vignette more than my 25mm lens?
Regards, C. |
Yes indeed, shorter FL has vignetting as those lenses were not computed for larger sensors. I also have the 12.5mm but it vignettes way too much to use it...
My both 50mm lenses are very good, no complains! https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums/72157672400003047/
taken fully open from what I remember... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|