| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars
Joined: 03 Nov 2021
Posts: 223
Location: Austria
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2022 11:25 am Post subject: Hundredthirtyfivers |
 |
|
ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars wrote:
I recently did inventory in my treasure trove. Just checking if they´re all here and well. I have quite a bunch of fifties, but these were very consciously made acquisitions.
So of my 135ers, I know I wanted the Zuiko, the Hexanon and the Vivitar. The other 5 merely "happened" when I became curious of older lenses. I didn´t get those "by-catch" exactly for free, but I was never after them either. I.e. the Soligor was a no-brainer-price when I went to pick up a good Meyer Oreston 50mm.
135ers are in abundance available, and tendentially cheaper than the neighboring focal lenths beneath and above, except vor very special beasts. Seems to be the second common focal length after the fifties.
So I have a nice little collection. Probably really little in comparison to those of some other fellows here. But knowing the accidential compilation of that collection of mine, I wonder how other people came to their 135ers. All planned children?
Olympus Zuiko MC 135mm 1:2.8. Min. focus distance 1.5m.
Pentacon 2.8/135, M-42, 16-bladed aperture. Min. focus distance 1.5m.
Jupiter-11 4/135, M-39, 12-bladed aperture. Min. focus distance 2.5m.
Vivitar Series 1, 135mm 1/2.3, K-AR. Min. focus distance 0,9m.
CZJ Triotar 4/135 T, M-42. Min. focus distance 1.2m.
Mayfair Sankor F:3.5 135mm, M-42, 14-bladed aperture. Min. focus distance 1.7m. (note the size next to those pumpkins)
Konica Hexanon AR 135mm F3.5. Min. focus distance 1.5m.
Soligor Tele-Auto 1/3.5 f=135mm, M-42. Min. focus distance 1.8m.
_________________
Cheers, Gerhard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
55
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 709
Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 5:21 am Post subject: Re: Hundredthirtyfivers |
|
|
55 wrote:
| ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars wrote: |
. . .
I wonder how other people came to their 135ers. All planned children?
|
Most were planned, yes. I can't remember which of my 135s arrived first, but it didn't take long for me to get hooked.
And I agree with you, Gerhard, I love the focal length, plentitude, variety and affordability of 135s.
My most used 135 is a Vivitar Close Focusing f/2.8 which focuses down to 1:2. It has good image quality and great versatility.
My biggest 135 disappointment was a Vivitar Series 1: Fast, close focusing, beautifully constructed - it was my 135mm dream lens and I paid too much for it.
Sadly, when wide open, its weak contrast and strong purple fringing are turn offs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7554
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:50 pm Post subject: Re: Hundredthirtyfivers |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| 55 wrote: |
| ZuikosHexanonsandVivitars wrote: |
. . .
I wonder how other people came to their 135ers. All planned children?
|
Most were planned, yes. I can't remember which of my 135s arrived first, but it didn't take long for me to get hooked.
And I agree with you, Gerhard, I love the focal length, plentitude, variety and affordability of 135s.
My most used 135 is a Vivitar Close Focusing f/2.8 which focuses down to 1:2. It has good image quality and great versatility.
My biggest 135 disappointment was a Vivitar Series 1: Fast, close focusing, beautifully constructed - it was my 135mm dream lens and I paid too much for it.
Sadly, when wide open its weak contrast and strong purple fringing are turn offs. |
I agree that the 135 CF is a versatile lens with good IQ. My 135/2.3 VMC does have fair amount of purple fringing but the contrast is acceptable to me.
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
55
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 709
Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:32 pm Post subject: Re: Hundredthirtyfivers |
|
|
55 wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
. . .
My 135/2.3 VMC does have fair amount of purple fringing but the contrast is acceptable to me. |
Perhaps copy - or photographer - variation?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The QC on Vivitar Series 1 lenses was next to non-existent judging by the massive copy variation seen.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
