View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 1998 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:33 pm Post subject: Mir-47K 20mm/2.5 on Sony A7 |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
Here are some photos I did this evening with this lens adapted on my Sony A7.
No adjustments exepted contrast and color pop.
Landscape photos @f8, flowers wide open.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
_________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 443
|
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2022 10:55 am Post subject: Re: Mir-47K 20mm/2.5 on Sony A7 |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
BurstMox wrote: |
Here are some photos I did this evening with this lens adapted on my Sony A7.
No adjustments exepted contrast and color pop.
Landscape photos @f8, flowers wide open.
#5
#7
|
Great shots - it's perhaps not everyone's taste, but I particularly love the rendering in these two. You really have such a vast amount of interesting lenses (going by your website) - a joy to see them in action! _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 516
|
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
Interesting to see some proper testing of these later 'Russian' ultrawides, particularly at that speed (I wasn't aware of).
I can't tell if it's high field curvature or high vignetting, which causes the edges to be sharp in some bokeh shots.
There is some lateral CA across parts of the frame but even my Tokina AT-X 17mm f3.5 has this (if not more).
I agree the bokeh appearance is quite nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SovietLensReviews
Joined: 03 Jul 2022 Posts: 2 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2022 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
SovietLensReviews wrote:
Definitely looks like a 'normal' Mir 47K, at least, mine looks very similar! Can't say I fell in love, way too soft in the corners (even for an ultrawide, IMO) but the f/2.5 is fun to play with.
What is the model number on yours? _________________ Check out my YouTube channel, where I review rare Soviet lenses: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzrQ-BZw4BpDLqQhVNx5x1g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 1998 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2022 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
SovietLensReviews wrote: |
Definitely looks like a 'normal' Mir 47K, at least, mine looks very similar! Can't say I fell in love, way too soft in the corners (even for an ultrawide, IMO) but the f/2.5 is fun to play with.
What is the model number on yours? |
Serial is 000077, made in 2000. What is your chanel? Your signature does not work.
EDIT : Ah, it works now _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SovietLensReviews
Joined: 03 Jul 2022 Posts: 2 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SovietLensReviews wrote:
BurstMox wrote: |
SovietLensReviews wrote: |
Definitely looks like a 'normal' Mir 47K, at least, mine looks very similar! Can't say I fell in love, way too soft in the corners (even for an ultrawide, IMO) but the f/2.5 is fun to play with.
What is the model number on yours? |
Serial is 000077, made in 2000. What is your chanel? Your signature does not work.
EDIT : Ah, it works now |
Nice, my copy was a '96 but it is probably the most shoddily constructed lens I own (could of course just have been the copy I bought, who knows). I need to take mine apart and give it a clean, think it's getting some haze or something inside. _________________ Check out my YouTube channel, where I review rare Soviet lenses: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzrQ-BZw4BpDLqQhVNx5x1g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 1998 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2022 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
SovietLensReviews wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
SovietLensReviews wrote: |
Definitely looks like a 'normal' Mir 47K, at least, mine looks very similar! Can't say I fell in love, way too soft in the corners (even for an ultrawide, IMO) but the f/2.5 is fun to play with.
What is the model number on yours? |
Serial is 000077, made in 2000. What is your chanel? Your signature does not work.
EDIT : Ah, it works now |
Nice, my copy was a '96 but it is probably the most shoddily constructed lens I own (could of course just have been the copy I bought, who knows). I need to take mine apart and give it a clean, think it's getting some haze or something inside. |
Mine is has a good construction, better than the Arsat 20/2.8. But the best construction is the Mir-20M. _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|