View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Ultrapix wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
Adopting a 'tude is always risky...and always is revealing of character -- some folks think they are better than others. Better at some things, yes, that is always the case. However the 'tude is often a judgement. I'm constantly reminded of one of Emperor Ashoka's Rock Edicts which warns how poo-pooing another's religion denigrates one's own. Ashoka said it much more eloquently in the original Sanskrit -- Rock Edict Seven, iirc.
EDIT: Rock Edict Twelve https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_Rock_Edicts#Major_Rock_Edict_12
Quote: |
... For whosoever praises his own sect or blames other sects, — all (this) out of pure devotion to his own sect, (i.e.) with the view of glorifying his own sect, — if he is acting thus, he rather injures his own sect very severely. ... |
|
Noble thoughts |
Noble thoughts indeed - reality is that usually those living in such places
are telling us that these two things are equal (talking about the buildings now, not about the photos!):
However, those living in such "buildings"
know very well that this is not true ...
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1571
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Stephan, there is certainly an intent in your lesson on good photography and now on social justice. It is not clear per se as it definitely sounds as an overinterpretation of the initial post and of the following remarks. I don't ask you about the intent itself. Could you please specify what kind of result you are expecting from such a hortative discussion here in the forum? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10543 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Reminded of the game "Twister" anybody? Where do you live, Steven, and aren't you poo-pooing the other places? What any of your posts have to with the OP I wonder? Okay, you're just having fun, but at others' expense? Joking around. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:05 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10543 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Blazer0ne wrote: |
Whatever the argument was... When I first saw these two photos side by side I thought it was funny, like some type of satire. In fact, it brings out the color of the shed photo even more. They almost compliment each other. The two would make for an interesting cut scene in a Wes Anderson style movie. |
Ah, thank you! I hadn't made that relation. Cleverly artistic imho! However creative, also was made fun of somebody's choice of purposeful subject, or not meant that way? _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 551 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
Probably the funniest thing is to exchange a farmer's tool shed for a house. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 551 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
Back to the lens: some 100 % crops center / edge of the 2 pictures above:
#1
#2
#3
#4
Those pictures weren't took for test purpose, so the ISO setting was a tad higher than optimal (400 / 800) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5028 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
Is that the same hill behind the buildings? _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 551 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
kansalliskala wrote: |
Is that the same hill behind the buildings? |
Roughly; It's the Subasio mount on both, but the background of the shed looks further south |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|