View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
domingo90
Joined: 09 Jan 2021 Posts: 4 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:25 pm Post subject: Telemegor 400mm not the EXA mount thought |
|
|
domingo90 wrote:
Hi all,
I got this lens not long ago, I thought it was an EXA mount but the adapter did not work. Does anyone have an idea of which bayonet is this?
Thanks for your help
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1304 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:32 pm Post subject: Re: Telemegor 400mm not the EXA mount thought |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
domingo90 wrote: |
Hi all,
I got this lens not long ago, I thought it was an EXA mount but the adapter did not work. Does anyone have an idea of which bayonet is this?
Thanks for your help
|
Yr pic will show now _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2493
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:33 pm Post subject: Re: Telemegor 400mm not the EXA mount thought |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
domingo90 wrote: |
Hi all,
I got this lens not long ago, I thought it was an EXA mount but the adapter did not work. Does anyone have an idea of which bayonet is this?
Thanks for your help
#1
#2
|
Beats me. Never seen it before. Maybe some unique adaption _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
domingo90
Joined: 09 Jan 2021 Posts: 4 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
domingo90 wrote:
I thought to adapt it to M42 to use it on my Pentax K-70 I will take the time to think about my options. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
Praktina?
Just a punt on first look. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Evert
Joined: 30 Aug 2015 Posts: 7 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Evert wrote:
Looks to me like an Exakta mount-but the external one.Ihafee's later camera's have next to an internal also an external bayonet. it is not easy to find an Exakta to anything adapter that uses this external bayonet. The market is too small?
Good luck and if you do find such an adapter please tell. _________________ Evert |
|
Back to top |
|
|
domingo90
Joined: 09 Jan 2021 Posts: 4 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
domingo90 wrote:
Evert wrote: |
Looks to me like an Exakta mount-but the external one.Ihafee's later camera's have next to an internal also an external bayonet. it is not easy to find an Exakta to anything adapter that uses this external bayonet. The market is too small?
Good luck and if you do find such an adapter please tell. |
I am trying to modify a pentacon to Pentax adapter, I am trying to create the space between the adapter and the ring, once you remove the ring you can swap the adapter. There are some m42 versions on ebay of that rear cone but it will be really nice if I get the P6 to PK running. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 406 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
That is definitely the external Exakta mount. I had a Primotar 180mm f3.5 with that mount and finally gave up finding an adapter. What I finally did was to buy an M39 to M42 adapter ring, which fits over the mount (after grinding off the tabs). It has three set screws, but they are not strong enough to hold the ring on, so there are two alternatives. First is to drill into the lens mount itself so that the set screws actually can screw into the lens mount to hold it, and/or epoxy the ring on. Doing both is most secure. This, however, will not focus to infinity using a standard M42 adapter, so what I did was to buy a 17-31mm M42 helicoid, which allows infinity focus, and additionally adds a bit more to the close focusing distance, although with a 400mm lens that is minimal. _________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
domingo90
Joined: 09 Jan 2021 Posts: 4 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
domingo90 wrote:
Evert wrote: |
Looks to me like an Exakta mount-but the external one.Ihafee's later camera's have next to an internal also an external bayonet. it is not easy to find an Exakta to anything adapter that uses this external bayonet. The market is too small?
Good luck and if you do find such an adapter please tell. |
There is an Italian machinist who makes all sorts of lens mounts his name is Andriano Lolli https://www.adrianololli.com/index.asp he has the mount from the telemegor 400 to pentax. I will contact him. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 566 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:33 am Post subject: Überwurfring |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
The longer Meyer lenses used to have an überwurfring; a fastening ring connecting the interchangable mount.
Try to unscrew this a few cm up from the exakta mount and you will find another thread that can form the basis for adaptation. The original Meyer M42 etc mounts exist, and will be hard to find, but a machine shop will be able to make suitable threads- However, since the lens is a 2 kilo monster you will need a solid connection piece unless your camera is very light.
p |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|