View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
chudy128314
Joined: 09 Oct 2015 Posts: 321 Location: Wrocław, Poland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:13 am Post subject: Projection lenses - my method of adapting with focusing |
|
|
chudy128314 wrote:
Finally I've found some time to adapt projection lenses using my currently favorite method to usable form, with functional focusing. In short - you need to make helical groove on lens' body and craft (or reuse) sleeve with lens' guiding pin. On the end of the sleeve you can place any mount you need - M42, M39, C-mount etc. (meeting proper flange focal distance).
Here are two quick examples.
Visionar 130/1.9, M42 mount:
Sample photo, Sony A7R, no post-processing besides resizing:
Triplet-5M 100/2.8:
Sample photo, Sony A7R, no post-processing besides resizing:
I also adapted a few big and heavy LOMO 100/2 (and similar).
Pros:
1. Cheap materials (you don't need to pay for helicoid, reductions etc., you only nee some aluminum)
2. You can use very heavy lens (no problem with friction caused by helicoid's bending)
3. You don't waste precious space between lens' back and flange for placing helicoid, especially important when lens has large diameter (larger than helicoid's opening) or short flange focal distance
4. Very long range of longitudinal lens movement while focusing, nearly as long as lens itself
Cons:
1. You need skillful serviceman with lathe
2. Focusing is not perfectly tight and smooth (but also many cheap Chinese helicoids I used had that problem) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Brilliant!
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Nice work!
But this is the main problem -
"1. You need skillful serviceman with lathe "
Cutting helicals like that is not a typical job. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
That's an excellent mount, I like it. But the other option is to cannibalise an old projector, some have the helicoid that is usable for this application. I've got an old Gnome projector that I think will make a suitable lens mount. Next project maybe? _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chudy128314
Joined: 09 Oct 2015 Posts: 321 Location: Wrocław, Poland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chudy128314 wrote:
Thanks! Making this groove indeed needs not only experienced lathe operator but also proper lathe.
This type of conversion I use only when there is no helicoid from projector. I reuse them whenever I can, I especially like Leitz devices - sometimes their helicoids work as smooth and precise as regular lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
_________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16541 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
A sales pitch it is? These are currently offered on ebay for sale....hence why I'm asking
I moved you other threads to the Lens Sales section where they belong!
A few questions:
- why need to damage the original lens by cutting groves into it, risking the optics inside?
- such a grove causes not very smooth focusing - why not use a cheap M65 helicoid costing $30 on ebay? Weight is anyway not carried by the camera but by holding the lens?
- what's the benefit of a rotating front lens (for instance if one wants to use a polarizing filter)?
- why show this solution here if basically only you and your mechanic are able to provide that? ---> "clever" sales pitch?? _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
Last edited by kds315* on Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
A sales pitch it is? These are currently offered on ebay for sale....hence why I'm asking
I moved you other threads to the Lens Sales section where they belong!
A few questions:
- why need to damage the original lens by cutting groves into it, risking the optics inside?
- such a grove causes not very smooth focusing - why not use a cheap M65 helicoid costing $30 on ebay? Weight is anyway not carried by the camera but by holding the lens?
- what's the benefit of a rotating front lens (for instance if one wants to use a polarizing filter)?
- why show this solution here if basically only you and your mechanic are able to provide that? ---> "clever" sales pitch?? |
I can answer the questions about "Sales pitch?" No, there is no sales pitch here, none whatsoever. Besides, what business is going to publish their how-to? Come on... _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16541 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
kds315* wrote: |
A sales pitch it is? These are currently offered on ebay for sale....hence why I'm asking
I moved you other thread to the Lens Sales section where they belong!
A few questions:
- why need to damage the original lens by cutting groves into it, risking the optics inside?
- such a grove causes not very smooth focusing - why not use a cheap M65 helicoid costing $30 on ebay? Weight is anyway not carried by the camera but by holding the lens?
- what's the benefit of a rotating front lens (for instance if one wants to use a polarizing filter)?
- why show this solution here if basically only you and your mechanic are able to provide that? ---> "clever" sales pitch?? |
I can answer the questions about "Sales pitch?" No, there is no sales pitch here, none whatsoever. Besides, what business is going to publish their how-to? Come on... |
Well, I just moved two threads into the Lens Sales section with the ebay auction link added to it
I left this one here as it shows the way it was adapted, for information, certainly worth knowing about! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
Last edited by kds315* on Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:59 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chudy128314
Joined: 09 Oct 2015 Posts: 321 Location: Wrocław, Poland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chudy128314 wrote:
It's presentation of a versatile method that I was looking for. No matter if I want to adapt RO-109-1A 50/1.2, Visionar 130/1.9, Visionar 200/1.9, Lomo RO502-1 110/2 - method is the same (I can't imagine adapting Visionar 200/1.9 with cheap M65 helicoid). Consequences described in questions 1, 2 and 3 should be definitely included into cons list, 4th one is already included.
And again - selling the lenses is my main inspiration for doing something new. If I have done something new I post about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djoredo
Joined: 13 Nov 2020 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
djoredo wrote:
Thanks for the post, it is very interesting!
I wanted to ask in order to focus do you rotate the front of the lens(the lens itself) or the cylinder with the guiding pin? And is the stepdown mount part of the cylinder with the guiding pin or is it threaded and removable?
Also would less space between the helical grooves make more precise focus and do you have any specific measures between the grooves themselves when you have them made? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2491
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
I've thought of taking apart a slide projector to get at a sleeve but there is probably a lot of superfluous plastic attached to them. Most slide projector lenses already have a helicoid for this purpose.
Edit. I went and opened up a Zeiss Ikon Slide Projector I picked up in a thrift store for the lens and took one out. Only need to cut of some stuff of the back and I can attach a K-mount to it.
Projector lens sleeve by The lens profile, on Flickr _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
I've thought of taking apart a slide projector to get at a sleeve but there is probably a lot of superfluous plastic attached to them. Most slide projector lenses already have a helicoid for this purpose.
Edit. I went and opened up a Zeiss Ikon Slide Projector I picked up in a thrift store for the lens and took one out. Only need to cut of some stuff of the back and I can attach a K-mount to it.
Projector lens sleeve by The lens profile, on Flickr |
It could work OK for some lenses but I suspect you'll need to lenses much cloer to the sensor than PK mount will allow.
My 50/1.2 projector needs to have the rear less than 10mm from the sensor for infinty focus, which IIRC places the fron't of the lens 50-60mm in fron't of the sensor. One of the mirrorless mounts on the back would work better but may still be too far out for infinity with many projector lenses.
You'll also need something to block any light getting through the opening round the focus mechanism. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2491
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
DConvert wrote: |
D1N0 wrote: |
I've thought of taking apart a slide projector to get at a sleeve but there is probably a lot of superfluous plastic attached to them. Most slide projector lenses already have a helicoid for this purpose.
Edit. I went and opened up a Zeiss Ikon Slide Projector I picked up in a thrift store for the lens and took one out. Only need to cut of some stuff of the back and I can attach a K-mount to it.
|
It could work OK for some lenses but I suspect you'll need to lenses much cloer to the sensor than PK mount will allow.
My 50/1.2 projector needs to have the rear less than 10mm from the sensor for infinty focus, which IIRC places the fron't of the lens 50-60mm in fron't of the sensor. One of the mirrorless mounts on the back would work better but may still be too far out for infinity with many projector lenses.
You'll also need something to block any light getting through the opening round the focus mechanism. |
That's OK I am not really going to do infinity anyway, and most projector lenses are bit longer than 50mm anyway so they should be ok. I'll find out. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
DConvert wrote: |
D1N0 wrote: |
I've thought of taking apart a slide projector to get at a sleeve but there is probably a lot of superfluous plastic attached to them. Most slide projector lenses already have a helicoid for this purpose.
Edit. I went and opened up a Zeiss Ikon Slide Projector I picked up in a thrift store for the lens and took one out. Only need to cut of some stuff of the back and I can attach a K-mount to it.
|
It could work OK for some lenses but I suspect you'll need to lenses much cloer to the sensor than PK mount will allow.
My 50/1.2 projector needs to have the rear less than 10mm from the sensor for infinty focus, which IIRC places the fron't of the lens 50-60mm in fron't of the sensor. One of the mirrorless mounts on the back would work better but may still be too far out for infinity with many projector lenses.
You'll also need something to block any light getting through the opening round the focus mechanism. |
That's OK I am not really going to do infinity anyway, and most projector lenses are bit longer than 50mm anyway so they should be ok. I'll find out. |
I think my projector lenses all sit quite close to the sensor for infinity - if you're planning on using longer lenses for close up shots thats probably not to much of an issue, but it could still be an issue for portraints with a lens around 100mm. Several of my longer projector lenses could have the lens body trimmed off at the back with out any problem - some have the rear elements recessed by around 4".
Hope it works out for you - please share your results either way |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|