View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
AlexWicks
Joined: 16 May 2012 Posts: 57 Location: Ipswich, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:21 pm Post subject: Minolta MD 28mm f/2.8 - thoughts? |
|
|
AlexWicks wrote:
So i got a Minolta 28mm f/2.8 MD recently for £15, late MD version with 49mm filter thread. I haven't recieved my adapter yet so I can't test it - does anyone have this lens and if so, how do you find it? Samples would be nice too if possible, and once I recieve my adapter I will post some soon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3748 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
The MD-III version of the Minolta 2.8/28mm exists in two different versions:
* 7-lens
* 5-lens
From outside they are difficult to distinguish; performance-wise the older 7-lens version (which was made as MC-X, MD-II and MD-II as well) is slightly better:
http://www.artaphot.ch/minolta-sr/objektiv-vergleiche/330-nex-5n-und-28mm-objektive
Stephan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
I have it and I think it's an ok lens for the money. Not really special in any way but good enough for most purposes. Here's my flickr album for this lens, but it doesn't contain many photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/8800601@N04/sets/72157645460465821 _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AlexWicks
Joined: 16 May 2012 Posts: 57 Location: Ipswich, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AlexWicks wrote:
Thanks guys! Great pictures too miran, seems like the lens is quite capable!
So I got bored and decided to "freelens" with it, with a metabones EF adapter mounted onto the a7s:
(IS04000 btw, so maybe not the best representation of quality but still quite good IMO) _________________ Cameras: Sony a7s | EOS 400D | Praktica MTL3, LTL3, LLC | FED 5B
Lenses: Helios 44-2 & 44-3 | Indulstar 61 LZ | Pentacon 35mm f2.8 | Pentacon 28mm f2.8 | Minolta 28mm f2.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
listera
Joined: 24 Oct 2013 Posts: 126 Location: Ankara
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
listera wrote:
If wonder which version your MD is, this page may help. Hint: presence of the thin ring over the frontmost element.
http://home.kpn.nl/dielpeet/minolta/minolta-28mm-lenses.htm
I have the 7/7 version. It produces photos with nice background at close distances. Stopped down a bit, results are not bad. And Minolta colors are always with you.
I like this photo very much, maybe more than I should as it is the second time I am sharing it here (sorry)
Foliage
. _________________ Zuikoware / Rokkorprone / FDthropist
https://www.flickr.com/photos/97103793@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NACEOD
Joined: 04 Jan 2015 Posts: 12 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
NACEOD wrote:
I just converted the Celtic version to a direct Canon EOS mount. I took it to the Grand Canyon earlier this month. Here's a panorama stitched together using Microsoft Image Composite Editor. It is 10 photos, 5 across and 2 high. Not the best quality but fun to use.
Here's one of the center photos used in the panorama.
Here's a 100% crop from the center of the above panorama and photo. The distance to this point in the photo from where I was standing is about 3 miles.
I took the photos in the middle of the day under the blazing Arizona sun. I had a polarizing filter on to cut through the haze and smoke from a controlled burn in the forest that was drifting into the canyon. The photos were taken using a Canon 50D at 1/800 sec at f11. I also used a tripod and delayed shutter release. I wish I had brought along my Canon EF 28-135mm to compare.
I'm pretty happy with the results for a lens I purchased for $5.00. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WNG555
Joined: 18 Dec 2014 Posts: 784 Location: Arrid-Zone-A, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
WNG555 wrote:
^ $5?!! Oy! Lucky dog!
Killer photos folks!
I also have the MD Celtic version with 55mm filter, same lens as the MD W Rokkor-X. 7 elements.
It has excellent resolution, and vibrant colors thanks to the MD coating.
It's one of my top favorite 28mm lenses. _________________ "The eyes are useless when the mind is blind."
Sony ILCE-6000, SELP1650, SEL1855, SEL55210, SEL5018. Sigma 19/30/60mm f2.8 EX DN Art.
Rokinon 8mm f3.5 Fish-Eye, 14mm f2.8 IF ED UMC. Samyang 12mm f2.8 ED AS NCS Fish-Eye.
And a bunch of Manual-Focus Lenses
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tf
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 162
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tf wrote:
As it known, the late Minolta MD (New MD, MD III) has a two versions of 28mm F2.8 lens - one is 7 elements in 7 groups, another is 5 elements in 5 groups
Here the review with tests for older 7x7
Here the review with tests for newer 5x5 (I met the opinion somewhere that the autofocused Minolta AF lens has the same scheme, but I have no confirmation)
And all four Minolta MD 28mm lens comparison "head to head" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Posts: 280 Location: наша раша
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
Minolta MD 28mm f2.8 for the money a very good lens (low ca, as do many other Minolta lenses) I have a copy to sell because he is much "lathering" on one side.
A7R + Minolta Md 28mm f2.8
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3748 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
WNG555 wrote: |
^ $5?!! Oy! Lucky dog!
Killer photos folks!
I also have the MD Celtic version with 55mm filter, same lens as the MD W Rokkor-X. 7 elements.
It has excellent resolution, and vibrant colors thanks to the MD coating.
... |
The Minolta Celtic lenses have only single layer coatings; for the "real Minolta coating" you must go for a real MC/MD lens
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steakface
Joined: 19 Oct 2017 Posts: 18 Location: Royal Oak, Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steakface wrote:
I have this lens, 7/7 MD-III version, I only find it OK. Center is nice and sharp but edges and corners never really get there. My copy is its sharpest at f/5.6, diffraction degrades image quality at f/8. I find it performs better on 24m-pix full frame than it does on 16m-pix APS-C.
I have an MD-I 28mm f/3.5 5/5 on the way, it should be a bit better on the sides but we will see!
EDIT: Got the MD-I 28mm f/3.5 5/5. It's sharper in the center at all aperture lengths but corners are worse. I'm wondering if Minolta changed the glass from the MC-X 5/5 version. Oh well, still a good lens. _________________ http://northernwintersky.net/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/northernwintersky/
Film Cameras: Minolta SRT-Super, Pentax MX
Digital Camera: Fuji X-T3
Most Used Lenses on Digital: MD 50mm f/2, Pentax K 55mm f/1.8, Pentax M 50mm f/1.7
Last edited by Steakface on Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:02 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3748 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Here's a link to my comparison of all the Minolta MC/MD 28mm lens designs:
* 3.5/28mm (MC-I [7/7], 67mm filter diameter)
* 3.5/28mm (MC-I/MC-II/MC-X, [7/7], 55mm filter diameter)
* 3.5/28mm (MC-X, MD-I/MD-II/MD-III, [5/5])
* 2.5/28mm (MC-I, MD-II, MC-X)
* 2/28mm (MC/MD-I/MD-II)
* 2/28mm (MD-III)
* 2.8/28mm (MC/MD-I/MD-II/MD-III, [7/7])
* 2.8/28mm (MD-III, [5/5])
http://artaphot.ch/minolta-sr/objektiv-vergleiche/506-minolta-mc-md-28mm-lenses-on-24mp-full-frame
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 835
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Is there a way to tell if the MD III is a 5/5 or 7/7? Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Is there a way to tell if the MD III is a 5/5 or 7/7? Thanks. |
The front name ring looks slightly different; i.e. the 5/5 version shows an extra inner ring and this is missing on the 7/7 version.
Furthermore the serial of the 7/7 starts with 8xxxxxx and the newer 5/5 with 9xxxxxx.
There are contradictory informations as to which is the better version. I have both but didn't compare them directly yet; i.e. I don't know. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 614 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Is there a way to tell if the MD III is a 5/5 or 7/7? Thanks. |
Another difference is that the IR dot on the depth of focus scale is in ever so slightly a different place for the two different models. On both models it is between the F4 and F8 mark on the right hand side of the scale, but on the 5/5 model it is slightly closer to F8, and on the 7/7 model it is slightly closer to the F4 mark. You need to compare photos of both to see what is a very small difference, but it is quite handy once you know, as the serial number is not always shown in listings. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|