View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
linebrell
Joined: 10 Apr 2019 Posts: 234 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 24, 2019 10:05 am Post subject: Jupiter-9 85/2 |
|
|
linebrell wrote:
Russian 85mm lens "Юпитер-9". Heavy and compact, 15 blades aperture, nice bokeh.
X-T1 2018-02-24 028 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr
X-T1 2018-01-28 116 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr
X-T1 2018-01-28 181 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr
X-T2 2018-12-09 240 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr
X-T2 2018-12-09 380 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr
X-T2 2018-12-16 351 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr
X-T2 2018-12-16 348 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr
X-T2 2019-04-13 393 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr
X-T2 2019-04-13 338 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Sat Aug 24, 2019 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
That is a nice render linebrell . It kind of reminds me of a biotar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
56 DIN
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 Posts: 1656 Location: Germany Erbach /ODW
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2019 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
56 DIN wrote:
barbed wire - the ultimate subject to show bokeh
I think it is quite different to the biotar _________________ Thomas
NEX & manual lenses
Nikon & manual lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
linebrell
Joined: 10 Apr 2019 Posts: 234 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2019 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
linebrell wrote:
As i know, Jupiter family lens were based on sonnar scheme. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019 Posts: 821
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
Excellent portraits. Do you remember the aperture? Mine is not very sharp at 2,0 or 2,8. Your portraits are razor sharp. _________________ Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
linebrell
Joined: 10 Apr 2019 Posts: 234 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
linebrell wrote:
lumens pixel wrote: |
Excellent portraits. Do you remember the aperture? Mine is not very sharp at 2,0 or 2,8. Your portraits are razor sharp. |
F2-F2.8, haven't used smaller apertures with it for portraits. I've read on russian forums that there are can be sample variations. I also can see that some Jupiters-9 have strong visible outline in "bokeh balls", mine doesn't produce it.
I also use it with Lens Turbo II adapter, so it probably looks sharper, "compressed" from fullframe coverage to crop-sensor.
http://evtifeev.com/25220-yupiter-9-85-2-mc-vs-yupiter-9-85-2-ne-ms.html
http://evtifeev.com/5143-9-852-2.html
Different versions.
Like helios lens i have, there were strong quality spread:
one 44m-6 was blurry, second is better. I had pretty sharp in center helios 44-3 and then standart 44-2 that was worse. Now i have helios 77m-4, looks good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
linebrell wrote: |
F2-F2.8, haven't used smaller apertures with it for portraits. I've read on russian forums that there are can be sample variations. |
Nice! It seems you have a good copy. My copy, a 1958 KMZ rangefinder-version, is also excellent and already reasonably sharp wide open. But judging from other experiences on forums, it seems this is the lens with the largest variation.
linebrell wrote: |
I also can see that some Jupiters-9 have strong visible outline in "bokeh balls", mine doesn't produce it. |
I can see some on your images though, especially on #1 and 5. Mine does this too under certain circumstances (such as backlit foliage) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
linebrell
Joined: 10 Apr 2019 Posts: 234 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2020 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
linebrell wrote:
X-T2 2020-05-23 157 by Yaroslav Golubev, on Flickr
Forest bokeh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|