| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6008
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
 Posted: Mon May 11, 2020 4:41 am Post subject: Olympus OM-System E.Zuiko Auto-T 100mm f2.8 |
 |
|
Oldhand wrote:
A tiny lens, not much longer than a standard 50mm f1.4.
On Fuji XE 2s
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10531
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2921
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Very nice indeed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020
Posts: 987
Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
I've liked the coatings colors on the OM Zuiko lenses ever since I first saw a fast 135.
Beautiful renderings!
-D.S.
_________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 834
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
I like very much the black and white ones
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dejan
Joined: 05 Jan 2021
Posts: 142
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dejan wrote:
I wonder about the "real world" difference between this E. Zuiko version (with old single coating) and more modern variants (Zuiko without the E and MC version). They are supposed to be optically the same (which doesn't mean that quality didn't change over time, like it happened with some other Olympus lenses, or so people say), with perhaps significant difference in flare resistance and contrast. Since it's not the most common lens I don't suppose many people got to compare different versions. I can buy this E. Zuiko version for okay price, but I'm unsure if it can work as a landscape lens under more difficult light. In any case, I'm mostly impressed by the size of the lens and I already know that build quality of old Zuiko lenses is fantastic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alsatian2017
Joined: 05 Mar 2018
Posts: 237
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alsatian2017 wrote:
| Dejan wrote: |
| I wonder about the "real world" difference between this E. Zuiko version (with old single coating) and more modern variants (Zuiko without the E and MC version). They are supposed to be optically the same (which doesn't mean that quality didn't change over time, like it happened with some other Olympus lenses, or so people say), with perhaps significant difference in flare resistance and contrast. Since it's not the most common lens I don't suppose many people got to compare different versions. I can buy this E. Zuiko version for okay price, but I'm unsure if it can work as a landscape lens under more difficult light. In any case, I'm mostly impressed by the size of the lens and I already know that build quality of old Zuiko lenses is fantastic. |
I only own an E.Zuiko Auto-T 100 mm f/2,8 and I won't buy a more recent version just to find out about the differences in the coating. Anyway, I never worried about flare resistance with my lens (I added a metal shade) after seeing the results. With only 5 elements and partly highly refractive glass (which reduces the size of the lens), you shouldn't see much difference and Olympus used different layers (sepia and purple colored) which should further improve things. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dejan
Joined: 05 Jan 2021
Posts: 142
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dejan wrote:
Thanks for your input! I wondered because MC version seemed to handle difficult light quite well (review by Phillip Reeve), which makes it a fine all-around lens, especially around golden hour for some shots with the Sun in or just outside the frame. I couldn't find much info for this version (the only one I can buy locally). Usually I don't care that much about this, but it seemed to be the lens' strongest point compared to alternatives I own (and I wouldn't buy the same lens twice just to find out either). I may give it a go, they don't make them anymore and it's only going to be harder to find nice copies as time goes by. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2921
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
I always liked this lens, it looks like a little jewel. And pretty good optics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
