View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
michaelanburaj
Joined: 16 Jan 2018 Posts: 31 Location: California, USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 5:51 pm Post subject: request: test/info. Summicron-R 50 vs Zenitar 50 1.7 |
|
|
michaelanburaj wrote:
Hello All,
Although I have couple of 50s and find time useful at different things, smmicron-R has been in my mind. I have seen references made to Zenitar being copy of summicron. How similar or dissimilar are these in use? I would appreciate any direct real use tests comparing them or against other 50s.
There is also the question of v1 vs v2.
Thanks,
-Michael. _________________ A7r, 5D-mkI
Canon: 135L, 70-200 IS f/4L, 17-40 f/4L, Sigma 50 f/1.4
CZ distagon 21mm f/2.8, 35mm f/1.4, 35mm f/2, 28mm f/2, 25mm f/2
CZ C/Y distagon 35 f/1.4, 28 f/2.8, planar 50 f/1.4 C/Y, 50 f/1.7 C/Y
CZJ sonnar 50 f/1.5, pancolar 50 f/1.8, biotar 58, biometar 80, sonnar 180 f/2.8
Helios 44m-5, Zenitar 50 f/1.7, Jupiter 9, jupiter 3, Mir-1B, Fujinon 55 f/2.2
Samyang 14mm f/2.8, 35mm 1.4, 85 1.4, 135 f/2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wolfhansen
Joined: 06 Oct 2013 Posts: 511 Location: Germany, Ruhr Area
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wolfhansen wrote:
i have both lenses - tuesday i'm back at home and can take some test shots _________________ Greets
Wolfgang |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2491
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
The Summicron R 50/2 is a 6/4 design. The Zenitar-m is a 6/5 design. The Zenitar-m is supposed to be a copy of the Carl Zeiss Ultron (Hence it is called the poor man's Ultron). _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 942 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
The Summicron R 50/2 is a 6/4 design. The Zenitar-m is a 6/5 design. The Zenitar-m is supposed to be a copy of the Carl Zeiss Ultron (Hence it is called the poor man's Ultron). |
The Carl Zeiss Ultron 50mm f1.8 is a 7 elements design .
6/4 and 6/5 are such common designs that it may be difficult to find out who copied whom. 6/4 designs are inspired by the original Planar.
Regarding the comparison , I have the Zenitar which is a very nice lens. It is not very contrasty and I suppose that this will be the first big difference to the Summicron. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
memetph wrote: |
The Carl Zeiss Ultron 50mm f1.8 is a 7 elements design . |
The original Ultron design was indeed 6/5 designed by A.W. Tronnier for Voigtländer apprx. 1950. The Zenitar is a Ultron and some other lenses as well (e.g. the Minolta 50/1.7, Pentax 50/1.7, etc.).
The "Carl Zeiss" Ultron you are referring to was also designed by Tronnier in the late 1960's and built by Voigtländer as well and is an enhanced Ultron design with an additional front element. The only connex to Carl Zeiss is that Voigtländer at this time already was part of the Zeiss trust and for whatever reason Zeiss decided to use their brand name on Voigtländer products. The later Rollei Planar/Voigtländer Ultron 50/1.8 are slightly modified copies of this enhanced Ultron (designed by Glatzel/Zeiss). _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michaelanburaj
Joined: 16 Jan 2018 Posts: 31 Location: California, USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
michaelanburaj wrote:
Hello All, Thanks a lot for providing information from their design, this is extremely useful. I will do further reading along these lines.
Hi Wolfgang, Thank you in advance for your test/sample pictures effort.
-Michael. _________________ A7r, 5D-mkI
Canon: 135L, 70-200 IS f/4L, 17-40 f/4L, Sigma 50 f/1.4
CZ distagon 21mm f/2.8, 35mm f/1.4, 35mm f/2, 28mm f/2, 25mm f/2
CZ C/Y distagon 35 f/1.4, 28 f/2.8, planar 50 f/1.4 C/Y, 50 f/1.7 C/Y
CZJ sonnar 50 f/1.5, pancolar 50 f/1.8, biotar 58, biometar 80, sonnar 180 f/2.8
Helios 44m-5, Zenitar 50 f/1.7, Jupiter 9, jupiter 3, Mir-1B, Fujinon 55 f/2.2
Samyang 14mm f/2.8, 35mm 1.4, 85 1.4, 135 f/2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1053 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
In the "Library" section of this forum you can find the book "Leica R Lenses" by Erwin Puts, the most reliable author on Leica gear ( http://forum.mflenses.com/leica-r-lenses-by-erwin-puts-t77840.html ).
You'll find there all the information you need about Summicron-R lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michaelanburaj
Joined: 16 Jan 2018 Posts: 31 Location: California, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
michaelanburaj wrote:
Very good read, thanks a lot for sharing! It is loaded with a lot of useful info.
Thanks, _________________ A7r, 5D-mkI
Canon: 135L, 70-200 IS f/4L, 17-40 f/4L, Sigma 50 f/1.4
CZ distagon 21mm f/2.8, 35mm f/1.4, 35mm f/2, 28mm f/2, 25mm f/2
CZ C/Y distagon 35 f/1.4, 28 f/2.8, planar 50 f/1.4 C/Y, 50 f/1.7 C/Y
CZJ sonnar 50 f/1.5, pancolar 50 f/1.8, biotar 58, biometar 80, sonnar 180 f/2.8
Helios 44m-5, Zenitar 50 f/1.7, Jupiter 9, jupiter 3, Mir-1B, Fujinon 55 f/2.2
Samyang 14mm f/2.8, 35mm 1.4, 85 1.4, 135 f/2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wolfhansen
Joined: 06 Oct 2013 Posts: 511 Location: Germany, Ruhr Area
|
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wolfhansen wrote:
Sorry for the delay, but shxxty weather here. So here some sample pics of the 1.7/50mm Zenitar and the Leitz Summicron-R 2.0/50mm.
Both Lenses wide open at the Sony A7II handheld, Auto-ISO, A-Modus, JPG
#1
Zenitar
Summicron
#2
Zenitar
Summicron
#3
Zenitar
Summicron
#4
Zenitar
Summicron
#5
Zenitar
Summicron
#6
Zenitar
Summicron
#7
Zenitar
Summicron _________________ Greets
Wolfgang |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michaelanburaj
Joined: 16 Jan 2018 Posts: 31 Location: California, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
michaelanburaj wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
I love real world comparisons like this, much prefer this over brick wall tests. Thanks a lot for the effort! Summicron seems to be more saturated. What is your general feeling about the 2 lenses in terms of image quality?
FYI: I will do a similar test between the zeintar, planar, pancolar & summicron as soon as I receive my sample (soon).
Thanks,
-Michael. _________________ A7r, 5D-mkI
Canon: 135L, 70-200 IS f/4L, 17-40 f/4L, Sigma 50 f/1.4
CZ distagon 21mm f/2.8, 35mm f/1.4, 35mm f/2, 28mm f/2, 25mm f/2
CZ C/Y distagon 35 f/1.4, 28 f/2.8, planar 50 f/1.4 C/Y, 50 f/1.7 C/Y
CZJ sonnar 50 f/1.5, pancolar 50 f/1.8, biotar 58, biometar 80, sonnar 180 f/2.8
Helios 44m-5, Zenitar 50 f/1.7, Jupiter 9, jupiter 3, Mir-1B, Fujinon 55 f/2.2
Samyang 14mm f/2.8, 35mm 1.4, 85 1.4, 135 f/2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbass
Joined: 27 Jul 2019 Posts: 441
|
Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
cbass wrote:
Without extreme pixel peeping the lenses seem to perform very similar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbass
Joined: 27 Jul 2019 Posts: 441
|
Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
cbass wrote:
Without extreme pixel peeping the lenses seem to perform very similar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wolfhansen
Joined: 06 Oct 2013 Posts: 511 Location: Germany, Ruhr Area
|
Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
wolfhansen wrote:
Hello Michael,
i like both lenses. The Summicron is in my Top10 List because of the haptics and overall performance.
My top lens in the 50mm range (and i have 51 lenses in the 50-58mm range) is still the Tronnier Zeiss Ultron 1.8/50mm (M42).
Incredible piece of glass
Here some examples on the Sony A7II:
http://forum.mflenses.com/carl-zeiss-ultron-1-8-50mm-m42-shoots-a-carrera-911-t80449,highlight,%2Bultron.html _________________ Greets
Wolfgang |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2491
|
Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Summicron, more contrasty. Zenitar better Bokeh. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cbass
Joined: 27 Jul 2019 Posts: 441
|
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
cbass wrote:
Personally, I don't see too much of a bokeh difference between the two lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
wolfhansen wrote: |
i like both lenses. The Summicron is in my Top10 List because of the haptics and overall performance.
My top lens in the 50mm range (and i have 51 lenses in the 50-58mm range) is still the Tronnier Zeiss Ultron 1.8/50mm (M42).
Incredible piece of glass |
I like the Zenitar as well. The only shortcoming is the rather strong tendency for CA's (purple fringing) when used wide open. The Summicron does far better in that respect.
How does the "Zeiss" Ultron perform in this discipline? Do you have typical example pictures from this lens to check it's CA performance?
Would be really great if you would show any comparison between the Zenitar and the Zeiss Ultron in a typical purple fringing scenery as well.
Thanks, _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wolfhansen
Joined: 06 Oct 2013 Posts: 511 Location: Germany, Ruhr Area
|
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wolfhansen wrote:
Hello Thomas, especially for you i leave my couch to shot some
pics with the Zeiss (Voigtländer) Ultron
Here are quick and dirty:
#1
#2
#3
_________________ Greets
Wolfgang |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2019 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
wolfhansen wrote: |
Hello Thomas, especially for you i leave my couch to shot some
pics with the Zeiss (Voigtländer) Ultron |
Many thanks, Wolfgang! Indeed amazing, no really visible CA's. By far better than the Zenitar and even the Summicron. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
michaelanburaj
Joined: 16 Jan 2018 Posts: 31 Location: California, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
michaelanburaj wrote:
Hi Wolfgang, All,
Thanks a lot for sharing your insight and additional samples/test images.
From your test, Zeiss (Voigtländer) Ultron seem to better the Zenitar in terms of CA & may be other aspects too. The Colors and overall Pictures production seem very similar (baring the differences).
Thanks,
-Michael. _________________ A7r, 5D-mkI
Canon: 135L, 70-200 IS f/4L, 17-40 f/4L, Sigma 50 f/1.4
CZ distagon 21mm f/2.8, 35mm f/1.4, 35mm f/2, 28mm f/2, 25mm f/2
CZ C/Y distagon 35 f/1.4, 28 f/2.8, planar 50 f/1.4 C/Y, 50 f/1.7 C/Y
CZJ sonnar 50 f/1.5, pancolar 50 f/1.8, biotar 58, biometar 80, sonnar 180 f/2.8
Helios 44m-5, Zenitar 50 f/1.7, Jupiter 9, jupiter 3, Mir-1B, Fujinon 55 f/2.2
Samyang 14mm f/2.8, 35mm 1.4, 85 1.4, 135 f/2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|