Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:33 pm Post subject: 1935 Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1:2.8. f=7.5cm. |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
Visualopsins mentioned giving it a whirl on the Fuji, so...
Not this lens...
...but this one, which I forgot to photograph before mummifying in decorators tape.
I find decorators tape has just the right 'give' to allow the lens and hood to be screwed on, rather than pushed on. It cuts it's own thread.
Yep, I re-purposed the outer shell of a Durst MITUB 1:1 as a hood. There's nothing standard about this lens. As a hood for the lens it works superbly. Only a few mm longer and it starts to vignette.
A few shots -
f:2.8. Fuji X-E1 (APSC) Std setting, all parameters zeroed, no pp. Natural light from right.
f:11 (sharpest). Settings as above.
f:11 (1:1)
PP to taste. Not for everyone I'd guess, but I love this look.
Phew! All done before tea .
Last edited by Sciolist on Wed Sep 18, 2019 7:01 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10541 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Wedding lens! Kind of long maybe. Would like to see on FF. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Wedding lens! Kind of long maybe. Would like to see on FF. |
Ha , I didn't know there were such things as wedding lenses, but I see what you mean. For some reason, and incongruously, The Godfather popped into my head. I'll have to find out what Coppola was using to see if I'm in good company lol. No doubt something specially made for him, and extremely expensive.
In terms of using FF, I'd agree, it would be interesting. With the lens being for the vest pocket Exakta's, at 4cm x 6cm, I suppose you are really looking past FF, past the 'super 35' Fuji GFX's, to something like the Phase One. I'd guess I'm barely out of the centre circle with APSC, but it does provide a lovely render all the same. |
|