View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sarrasani
Joined: 03 Oct 2009 Posts: 419
Expire: 2020-05-14
|
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2019 12:37 pm Post subject: Carl Zeiss-Contax Distagon 18 mm with Sony a7r |
|
|
sarrasani wrote:
Thank you much for attention.
All the best,
Sandro
#1
#2
#3
_________________ some reflex, some mirrorless, a good LF camera......and the lenses, many: good, less good, excellent, almost new, old......I like to serve and to be served by the particular charachter of each of them, remaining "light" in PP.
Only fixed focal and manual focus. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10530 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2019 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
WOW! I feel small, like when looking at nighttime sky!
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sarrasani
Joined: 03 Oct 2009 Posts: 419
Expire: 2020-05-14
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sarrasani wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
WOW! I feel small, like when looking at nighttime sky!
|
Hi visualopsins! and thank you much for attention.
All the best,
Sandro _________________ some reflex, some mirrorless, a good LF camera......and the lenses, many: good, less good, excellent, almost new, old......I like to serve and to be served by the particular charachter of each of them, remaining "light" in PP.
Only fixed focal and manual focus. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
Nice!
It's not easy to get compelling compositions this wide, especially when there is no specific point of attention nearby.
Well done! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Great work!
I'm with Sjak on his praise.
I find it very difficult to fill even 24mm. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
aidaho wrote: |
I find it very difficult to fill even 24mm. |
Lat year, I've sold all my ultra-wides for this reason. This spring, I bought a cheap Tamron 10-24m for Pentax (APSC) in order to practice again in UWA. It's not a perfect lens (far from it) but since it's a zoom, it's very good at getting a feel for the wider focal lengths. If it works out, I'll allow myself to get the Russar 20mm for my Leica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
Sjak wrote: |
Lat year, I've sold all my ultra-wides for this reason. |
I know that feel. I've already sold my 28mm and soon will list my 24mm.
I am however waiting on the arrival of Nikkor 20/4.
You see, I have a hope/theory: somewhere on the other side of the wide angle there is a lens so wide, it will make shooting wide great again.
I just hope it isn't wider than my wallet. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3071 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sarrasani
Joined: 03 Oct 2009 Posts: 419
Expire: 2020-05-14
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sarrasani wrote:
Sjak wrote: |
aidaho wrote: |
I find it very difficult to fill even 24mm. |
Lat year, I've sold all my ultra-wides for this reason. This spring, I bought a cheap Tamron 10-24m for Pentax (APSC) in order to practice again in UWA. It's not a perfect lens (far from it) but since it's a zoom, it's very good at getting a feel for the wider focal lengths. If it works out, I'll allow myself to get the Russar 20mm for my Leica |
Not easy, I agree....I think that in these cases (wide compositions) is better ......to exxagerate, or to avoid.
To exxagerate, my preferred toy is the Voigtlander 10 mm. (linear, no distosion), better with some object at 30-40 cm. to guide the perspective...
All the best,
Sandro _________________ some reflex, some mirrorless, a good LF camera......and the lenses, many: good, less good, excellent, almost new, old......I like to serve and to be served by the particular charachter of each of them, remaining "light" in PP.
Only fixed focal and manual focus. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|