View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:47 pm Post subject: Minolta MC W Rokkor SG 28mm f3.5 |
|
|
walter g wrote:
So much for not buying any more lenses for awhile. This is the 1969 MC II version, 7/7 design,0.6MFD, and the weight is 245 grams. I've been chasing this lens for quite some time. You see alot of BIN sales but not that many auction sales. Not rare, but hard to get a good price on one.
Click here to see on Ebay _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kukhuvud
Joined: 01 Sep 2011 Posts: 96 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kukhuvud wrote:
What an excellent price! _________________
DSLR: Canon 5D MKIII
SLR: Voigtl�nder Bessaflex (Black), Pentax Spotmatic SP
Rangefinder: FED-2
Meyer: Oreston 50/1.8, Lydith 30/3.5, Orestegon 28/2.8
EOS: 24-70/2.8L, 85/1.2L II, 50/1.2L II, 100/2.8L Macro, 135/2.0L
Russians: Helios-40/1.5 (Silver), Mir 20M/3.5, Industar-26m 50/2.8
Takumar: S-M-C Takumar 50/1.4
Flickr: [url=http://www.envision.la[/url]
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
Thanks. I will post test results as soon as I get it, weather permitting of course. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Wow Walter, what a beauty, and what a bargain! It looks in fantastic condition, better than mine - some of the black on the focus grip is wearing on mine. Otherwise it looks identical - s/n is 1570834 _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ivan Lee
Joined: 03 Feb 2008 Posts: 230 Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ivan Lee wrote:
Nice! I'm seeking for one too, I have a competitor waiting (Konica 28/3.5) _________________ Ivan Lee Barcellos - Director of Photography
www.planoconjunto.com.br
Sony A7s
Lumix GH3
Minolta MC: Minolta MC 24/2.8 - Minolta MD 28/2 - Minolta MC 35/1.8 - Minolta MC 35/2.8 - Minolta MD 50/1.2 - Minolta MD Macro 50/3.5 - Minolta MD 100/2.5
Konica AR: Hexanon 28/3.5 - Hexanon 50/1.7 - Hexanon 57/1.4
M42: Industar 50-2 - CZ Pancolar 50/1.8
Olympus OM: Zuiko Auto-Macro 50/3.5 - Vivitar 28/2 Close Focus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
Wow Walter, what a beauty, and what a bargain! It looks in fantastic condition, better than mine - some of the black on the focus grip is wearing on mine. Otherwise it looks identical - s/n is 1570834 |
Thanks, Peter. How do you like yours? _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
Ivan Lee wrote: |
Nice! I'm seeking for one too, I have a competitor waiting (Konica 28/3.5) |
Thanks. I wouldn't mind seeing a shootout between those 2 lenses. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I'd like to see that shootout too, maybe add an S-M-C 28/3.5 or other.
Great price. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3437 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Congratulatios Walter, yours looks still better then mine (SN 1571024, near to yours Peter). I paid more some 40 years ago, don't remember me how much, after being disappointed about a new bought Chinon 28mm 2.8 (mechanical problems and crazy "service" within guarantee).
The IQ is good, but for people pictures indoors the lesser clear viewfinder was not easy. So later I purchased an additional Kiron 28mm 2.0 when I saw one local for a nice prize. But the Rokkor still stands!
Last edited by Minolfan on Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:02 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
walter g wrote: |
peterqd wrote: |
Wow Walter, what a beauty, and what a bargain! It looks in fantastic condition, better than mine - some of the black on the focus grip is wearing on mine. Otherwise it looks identical - s/n is 1570834 |
Thanks, Peter. How do you like yours? |
TBH, I haven't put it through its paces properly to make any opinion yet. (Bring on a NEX ) The test pics I took on film had nice rich colours and were pretty sharp although not exceptional. I also have a short series of pics which might have been taken with it, which have fairly bad barrel distortion (perhaps the most important aspect for me), and also some flare spots, so I'm not sure about it yet. It could have been a different lens. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
Minolfan wrote: |
Congraulatios Walter, yours looks still better then mine (SN 1571024, near to yours Peter). I paid more some 40 years ago, don't remember me how much, after being disappointed about a new bought Chinon 28mm 2.8 (mechanical problems and crazy "service" within guarantee).
The IQ is good, but for people pictures indoors the lesser clear viewfinder was not easy. So later I purchased an additional Kiron 28mm 2.0 when I saw one local for a nice prize. But the Rokkor still stands! |
Thank You. I can't wait to test mine. By the way the Kiron 28 2.0 is on my to buy list. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
walter g wrote: |
peterqd wrote: |
Wow Walter, what a beauty, and what a bargain! It looks in fantastic condition, better than mine - some of the black on the focus grip is wearing on mine. Otherwise it looks identical - s/n is 1570834 |
Thanks, Peter. How do you like yours? |
TBH, I haven't put it through its paces properly to make any opinion yet. (Bring on a NEX ) The test pics I took on film had nice rich colours and were pretty sharp although not exceptional. I also have a short series of pics which might have been taken with it, which have fairly bad barrel distortion (perhaps the most important aspect for me), and also some flare spots, so I'm not sure about it yet. It could have been a different lens. |
Thank You. Yea, I really want a Nex also. Maybe January if the month goes good. With a macro adapter on my 10D I won't get much distance to do a test. So I won't be able to test for barrel distortion, but atleast I can test for sharpness and Bokeh.
I got it today.It's every bit as nice as the pictures, and they even sent a free correct mint condition hood. With the severe cold I have, testing will have to be put off for several days. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010 Posts: 574 Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
revers wrote:
You stole that one Walter. _________________ Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Anybody interested in buying the later version?
I probably sell mine... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
Anybody interested in buying the later version?
I probably sell mine... |
Ha! I would have jumped at this but I've already bought one!
Actually Carsten, I've bought two, in addition to the older MC version like Walter's - the last MC version (55mm filter, which I think is virtually the same as your MD version), and the last MD version, with 49mm filter and aperture ring lock. If you were thinking of exchanging yours for the 49mm version I can tell you that although the filter ring is smaller, the overall diameter and the weight are virtually the same. Quite a hefty lens. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
If you were thinking of exchanging yours for the 49mm version I can tell you that although the filter ring is smaller, the overall diameter and the weight are virtually the same. Quite a hefty lens. |
No, Peter, I was not thinking about replacing one with the other, I rather have too many 28mm again and this Rokkor is one of the slowest lenses (f/3.5) and does not offer me anyting that my faster lenses (particularly the Pentax 2.8/28 or the Tamron 2.5/2 would not offer.
But I'm not in a hurry. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
peterqd wrote: |
If you were thinking of exchanging yours for the 49mm version I can tell you that although the filter ring is smaller, the overall diameter and the weight are virtually the same. Quite a hefty lens. |
No, Peter, I was not thinking about replacing one with the other, I rather have too many 28mm again and this Rokkor is one of the slowest lenses (f/3.5) and does not offer me anyting that my faster lenses (particularly the Pentax 2.8/28 or the Tamron 2.5/2 would not offer.
But I'm not in a hurry. |
Ah, that's OK then! As you were disappointed your MC was so large I just thought I'd warn you. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
clockwork247
Joined: 23 Dec 2010 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
clockwork247 wrote:
i got one of these in a buy, didn't realized it was the 1st edition version....
got this one and a vivitar 19 3.5 M42 mount for 50 bucks... and an oily maxxum 50 1.8, so it's not too bad, only bad thing is the oily maxxum that I did not spot when I bought it . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
clockwork247 wrote: |
i got one of these in a buy, didn't realized it was the 1st edition version....
got this one and a vivitar 19 3.5 M42 mount for 50 bucks... and an oily maxxum 50 1.8, so it's not too bad, only bad thing is the oily maxxum that I did not spot when I bought it . |
Good buy. The Vivitar 19MM is on my to buy list, but I've been to busy buying more Minolta lenses to hunt for one. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
If you us Google Chrome there's a thing called 'TinEye'. I've just downloaded it and will see how it works. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Did you post to the correct thread?
You can also go to Tineye.com, and Google has a similar function in the image search, just click the camera icon in the web page search box. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tf
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 162
|
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
tf wrote:
'Brand new' review of MC II 28/3.5
As a result: a well-working lens for wide-angle without strong weaknesses for a very reasonable price (very rare case for today ):
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3437 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Thanks!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Manichaean
Joined: 03 Oct 2013 Posts: 68
|
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Manichaean wrote:
I have two of them (both MC-X versions but slightly different from each other) and I found them average in terms of IQ, at best. The later MD-II (49mm filter) version is much better though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1304 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
Exemplary and thorough reviewing tf, great work. (the minolta not a patch on my smc 28 3.5...) _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|