View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
barryreid
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 285 Location: London
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
barryreid wrote:
Olympus wide primes are very good on the A7 series. I thought the Zuiko 24/2.8 was the best I tried out of Canon, Olympus, Tamron, Tokina and Yashica. Special mention for the Sigma Super-Wide II also, it’s almost as good as the Oly and much cheaper. Canon 24/2.8 seems to have big sample variation.
I can’t recommend the Tamron 17 as my copy was one of the worst lenses I used on the Sony - no way to get the edges and centre fully sharp at the same time. _________________ Canon + Contax + Minolta + Nikon + Olympus + Pentax + Yashica = Adaptall-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 515 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
willy35 wrote: |
kypfer wrote: |
Almost forgot my old Russian lenses! Assuming you can get an adaptor for your new camera to take 39mm "Leica-screw", the Russar MP-2 20mm f/5.6 can be quite awesome and the FED 28mm f/4.5 "pancake" is so thin it's almost invisible (and fiddly to operate). Although this FED lens looks like one of the collapsible 50mm lenses it is in fact perfectly "normal" in design. |
Why the Russar MP-2 20mm f/5.6 is so expansive ? I just looked on ebay, is it that good ? Is it rare ?
The black version is cool. |
I believe the Russar is very rare. Probably no better than any other lenses of it's era, but today's collector market has raised the prices very considerably ... 20 years ago you couldn't give away an Industar 50 or Helios 44 and other Russian lenses were similarly priced, everyone wanted bayonet-fit autofocus zooms.
Now the prime lenses are very fashionable, especially with the advent of mirror-less cameras, and the asking prices reflect this. If you just want to take photographs, there are probably better and cheaper lenses to do the job, but if you want to make a fashion statement then you'll have to pay the price (or get very lucky)! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017 Posts: 283 Location: наша раша
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
canon nfd 24mm f2.8
distagon 28mm f2.8 c/y
p/s By the way I in an urban environment it is difficult to find the plot for a 24mm. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I just remembered another ultra-wide. The Canon FL 19mm f/3.5 retrofocus. I used to own one -- it was a very impressive lens. They can be found on eBay, but they usually sell for a good chunk of change, too, usually for substantially more than the later 17mm f/4.
Note how almost the entire arc of the sunset colors are contained within the view of this image. This sort of thing can only be accomplished with an ultra-wide. Canon F-1, FL 19mm f/3.5, Kodachrome 64.
Vivitar 17mm f/3.5, Canon F-1, Fuji Velvia 50:
Same view as above, but with a 24mm
Canon F-1, Canon FD 24mm f/2.8 SSC, Velvia 50:
I used my image processing software to straighten the perspective in both of the above shots. Now the building's sides are parallel to the frame, but instead of looking right, to me there is an optical illusion that the sides are actually angling out. The mind wants to see a taper when looking up. I should have left a little taper in both images.
For example, I shot the below pic with my 85mm, and I left some taper in the photo. It looks much more natural as a result
_________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crouu
Joined: 02 Jan 2018 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
crouu wrote:
The AD2 Tamron 17mm can be 'ok' and is relatively cheap. The 24mm is quite good for the price. Is the 19-35 mentioned above the one also marketed late in the day as Vivitar Series 1? If so i'd pass, it has heavy CA. Ok for B&W. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Since I guess, we do not consider a 24mm lens a superwide lens, we need to look for a 21, 19 or 17mm lens.
There are plenty of really good and still rather affordable 24mm lenses out there, but as soon as you go wider, it gets a lot more expensive and most lenses don't perform as well.
The equations go like this:
superwide + supergood = superexpensive
superwide + cheap + good ≠ possible
I have a Tokina 4/17 which is not too bad, but it really suffers from flare on my A7II.
The Tamron Adaptall-II 4/17 is better than the Tokina, but also a tad more expensive.
My Leica Elmarit-M 2.8/21 shows a good resolution, but the corners are really bad on the Sony.
My Voigtländer 4.5/15 is still pretty usable, but the newer versions are much better. They are, however, not cheap at all.
My Voigtländer 5.6/10 (!) is the most extreme wide angle I have ever shot with and it's surprisingly good, but it sets you back one grand.
In order to find a matching wide angle for my A7II, I recently went for the Sony FE 2/28 and the wide angle adapter which gives you the FoV of a 21mm lens and it has AF (which can be a nice extra every now and then when shot wide open). The price is quite affordable.
With the set of 10 - 15 - 17 - 21 - 24 - 28... I am rather content. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
"superwide + cheap + good ≠ possible "
Its a question of personal standards -
How good is good enough? _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
kypfer wrote: |
Now the prime lenses are very fashionable, especially with the advent of mirror-less cameras, and the asking prices reflect this. If you just want to take photographs, there are probably better and cheaper lenses to do the job, but if you want to make a fashion statement then you'll have to pay the price (or get very lucky)! |
Did you consider that historic interest could be a motivation for purchasing certain types of lenses?
Maybe you are very fashion-aware, but I have no clue about it
I do agree though that prices sometimes can be hilarious when considered purely in view of the optical qualities of certain lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
willy35 wrote: |
What about the fujinon EBC 19mm 3.5 ? I got it this year for 150 euros, didn't yet had the chance to test it and can't found a lot of input about it. |
I bought one 2 years ago it was not worth keeping, my Nikkor 18/4 and Konica 21/4 _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big R
Joined: 29 Nov 2010 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big R wrote:
Got me a Tokina 19-35 AF 3,5-4,5 with a defective AF-motor for 18 EUR. I use it with a manual MinAF-Nex Adapter (with aperture control). Now I'll just have to wait for better weather... _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/commanderbrot/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
"superwide + cheap + good ≠ possible "
Its a question of personal standards -
How good is good enough? |
Of course. It always is.
But if the corners are too weak for landscape photography, it's no longer "good enough".
Any really cheap (<80€) superwide lens (<21mm) will generate problems that are not easy to cope with and restrict their use.
They might be OK for indoor shots in dimmed light but not for general photography (when sharpness and corner performance is not important anyway). That's at least my experience. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pinholecam
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 223
|
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
pinholecam wrote:
The Canon FD20/2.8 is probably the best 20mm for edge to edge sharpness for "cheap".
But its rather big.
I seldom use it as its big and I need a separate FD adapter and then all the other adapters for other lenses.
For wider, the Samyang 14/2.8 is better than any of the legacy options and often for cheaper.
Sit and enjoy the view by jenkwang, on Flickr
20170211-IMGP6983-1 by jenkwang, on Flickr
IMGP2476-CompAdj-1 by jenkwang, on Flickr
Sharp corner to corner at f11 on FF _________________ Flickr - https://flic.kr/s/aHsjYTLu26
APAD - http://bit.ly/1zv8ZMK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 515 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
Sjak wrote: |
kypfer wrote: |
Now the prime lenses are very fashionable, especially with the advent of mirror-less cameras, and the asking prices reflect this. If you just want to take photographs, there are probably better and cheaper lenses to do the job, but if you want to make a fashion statement then you'll have to pay the price (or get very lucky)! |
Did you consider that historic interest could be a motivation for purchasing certain types of lenses?
Maybe you are very fashion-aware, but I have no clue about it
I do agree though that prices sometimes can be hilarious when considered purely in view of the optical qualities of certain lenses |
Doubtless historic interest can be a factor, but what "historic interest" can be associated with a 1950's-'60's Russian lens, unless it went on a space trip or something?
As for fashion ... I bought some once, I'm still wearing it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RemcoR
Joined: 30 Dec 2014 Posts: 71 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
RemcoR wrote:
http://forum.mflenses.com/smc-pentax-k-mount-20mm-f4-t74308.html _________________ Samyang 14/2.8
Carl Zeiss Distagon 21/2.8
SMC Pentax FA 35/2 AL
Contax Vario-sonnar 35-70/3.4
Contax 50/1.7
Carl Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 ZK
SMC Pentax A 35-105/3.5 macro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big R
Joined: 29 Nov 2010 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big R wrote:
For anyone interested:
The 18 EUR (incl shipping) Tokina 19-35 AF 3.5-4.5 with defect AF-Motor. So in my defense: still a MF lens!
#1
Wide open. Well... see for yourself:
#2
might be f8 or f11 (as are the following) - can't really tell with my adapter. Corners still quite mushy.
#3
not the sharpest lens. Might also be poorly focused. But Corner shapness isn't a major factor with a wide angle lens I'd say.
#4
Also strong CA. But that can be handled in Post.
Conclusion: There are better lenses but for 18 EUR I can't really complain. Next time I'll use smaller apertures.
But I really, really like the 19mm field of view - perhaps I'm gonna bite the bullet and get me a modern WA-lens. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/commanderbrot/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
kypfer wrote: |
Doubtless historic interest can be a factor, but what "historic interest" can be associated with a 1950's-'60's Russian lens, unless it went on a space trip or something? |
Historic interest can have different meanings for different people I guess.
For me, items from former commie-times/places are generally interesting already just because of that. A magazine or car doesn't have to have traveled to the moon, or be signed by Brezhnev, to be interesting.
kypfer wrote: |
As for fashion ... I bought some once, I'm still wearing it |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
Big R wrote: |
For anyone interested:
The 18 EUR (incl shipping) Tokina 19-35 AF 3.5-4.5 with defect AF-Motor. So in my defense: still a MF lens!
Conclusion: There are better lenses but for 18 EUR I can't really complain. Next time I'll use smaller apertures.
But I really, really like the 19mm field of view - perhaps I'm gonna bite the bullet and get me a modern WA-lens. |
Probably the pics would benefit from edits giving a more vintage look (whether in color or B&W)
Besides, it was a cheap taste of the field of view, and as such already useful.
Not sure about the performance of Samyang FF-lenses, but I am quite happy with both my Samyang APSC lenses (8mm 2.8 and 12mm 2.0); the lenses are also sold under the brand names Rokinon, Bower, Walimex. I paid under 300 for the 12mm (new incl warranty, display model) and 308 for the 8mm (new, at a store in Tenerife while on vacation) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2018 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Big R wrote: |
Conclusion: There are better lenses but for 18 EUR I can't really complain. Next time I'll use smaller apertures.
But I really, really like the 19mm field of view - perhaps I'm gonna bite the bullet and get me a modern WA-lens. |
If you "bite the bullet" then I would recommend to go for the Minolta AF 20mm/F2.8 which should be available for apprx. 250,- Euro second hand (the new identical A-mount Sony lens sells for 600 to 750 Euro in my country). Most probably you won't get any better comparable FF lens for your A7 for less money. Obviously there is no E-mount FF lens in that focal length available.
It should perform like on my A850 which shares the same 24MP FF sensor.
Here is a worst case example shot fully open at F2.8 on my A850:
Stopped down it performs much better. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|