View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
coase
Joined: 08 Aug 2016 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 1:40 am Post subject: Making a stack with Vivitar 100mm macro |
|
|
coase wrote:
I've been playing with Zerene and learning how to stack images. This is my first experiment using the Kiron made Vivitar 100mm f2.8 macro lens. It's really a great lens for sharpness and fine adjustment, but I don't quite know how to stack a bunch of images and get rid of all the halos. Still I thought this might interest some people.
First shot is just a typical single image taken with the macro on an A7ii. The next shot shows what I was able to put out with a 15 pic stack. Even then I didn't have enough in between images to really handle some of the areas between different chess pieces.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Are you moving the camera to stack, or refocusing for each shot?
Refocusing will change the FOV, what you need is a macro rail and use that to "Focus".
This site has a wealth of knowledge on stacking: http://photomacrography.net/forum/index.php _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
Are you moving the camera to stack, or refocusing for each shot?
Refocusing will change the FOV, what you need is a macro rail and use that to "Focus".
This site has a wealth of knowledge on stacking: http://photomacrography.net/forum/index.php |
_________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
coase
Joined: 08 Aug 2016 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
coase wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
Are you moving the camera to stack, or refocusing for each shot?
Refocusing will change the FOV, what you need is a macro rail and use that to "Focus".
This site has a wealth of knowledge on stacking: http://photomacrography.net/forum/index.php |
I use an inexpensive focusing rail where I can manually adjust. Not going to pay for one of those automated ones. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
I tried to register on this site and was insulted by being accused as a spammer,their up tight attitude is too close to Pentax Forum Octergenarien attitude to even allow them the pleasure of my company. _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
kryss wrote: |
I tried to register on this site and was insulted by being accused as a spammer,their up tight attitude is too close to Pentax Forum Octergenarien attitude to even allow them the pleasure of my company. |
I'm a member since decades and have no issues at all there, so I wonder.... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
I am not a Spammer and answered all of their questions,have never been accused either.I am not bothered as there are enough great Photographers(including yourself} on MF to satisfy my needs and a great return of investment of $25/year. _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gatorengineer64
Joined: 26 Oct 2017 Posts: 279
|
Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 5:53 pm Post subject: Looks like a decent first go... Something I want to try.... |
|
|
Gatorengineer64 wrote:
Looks like a good start. I definitely will follow this thread.... _________________ A7R4, GFX50R and a bucket of mflenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
3dpan
Joined: 05 Nov 2017 Posts: 65 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
3dpan wrote:
What aperture were you using on the 100/2.8 for your stack individual images ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
coase
Joined: 08 Aug 2016 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
coase wrote:
3dpan wrote: |
What aperture were you using on the 100/2.8 for your stack individual images ? |
I was shooting it at too wide an aperture and I think for close up shots at home, the shorter focal lengths are better.
Here's a newer stack with the A6000 and a 55mm Vivitar macro shot at f11. I think it works out better here.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3215 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
If you shoot with a lens capable of going 1:1 it doesn't mean you'll end up with macro pictures. Neither of your examples fall into that category. Macro that is. Zerene is more macro/micro oriented software.
And I'm a member on that forum for a few good years. I wouldn't dare to say decades as Klaus did - he's very old, Mathusalem related - but I never had problems with them. Freackingly knowledgeable those guys. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
3dpan
Joined: 05 Nov 2017 Posts: 65 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
3dpan wrote:
As an amateur in image stacking I found Helicon Focus more user friendly. I'm not saying it's better or worse than Zerene. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst
Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 497 Location: Santa Clara, CA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst wrote:
Himself wrote: |
If you shoot with a lens capable of going 1:1 it doesn't mean you'll end up with macro pictures. Neither of your examples fall into that category. Macro that is. Zerene is more macro/micro oriented software.
And I'm a member on that forum for a few good years. I wouldn't dare to say decades as Klaus did - he's very old, Mathusalem related - but I never had problems with them. Freackingly knowledgeable those guys. |
The definition of "macro" is not set in stone. Some folks like to say it's at least 1:1, but for quite some time it was considered 1:2, and many folks consider 1:4 macro. Don't get so hung up on such a definition. I personally look at watch and similar photos as "macro" and many others do as well. There are of course folks who stick with an artificial definition of macro as 1:1 and above, and more power to them, but they should not impose this artificial limit upon others.
Now, what would have been much more informative would be to say that as the magnification increases, depth of field decreases, and a stacking program like Zerene is then required to get reasonable depth of field. For photos such as this watch, where the magnification is high enough, and object large enough, that it cannot all be made in sharp focus, then focus stacking is indeed required, and Zerene is completely appropriate for such application. _________________ ...See my Numismatic Photography website at: http://www.macrocoins.com
...Primary Studio Cameras: Sony A7Rm4 and Canon HRT2i
...Go-To studio lenses: Nikon 95mm and 105mm Printing-Nikkors; Schneider 85mm Macro-Varon; Nikon 5x, 10x, and 20x Measuring Microscope Objectives; Mitutoyo BD Plan Apo 50x Microscope Objective
...My Go-To Walkaround Lenses: Laowa 60mm Super Macro; Nikon 28-105D (in manual mode for macro); |
|
Back to top |
|
|
coase
Joined: 08 Aug 2016 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
coase wrote:
Thanks Ray. It's what I would have said had I seen the response earlier.
It was indeed larger than 1:2 but not 1:1. So in my mind it is appropriate to think of it as macro and useful for stacking.
Another way to put it is simple: if a macro lens works better for such a pic (in the case of greater than 1:2) or is not obtainable with a normal lens, then it's macro to me, however others may define it.
Besides, in my original post I was focussed on learning to stack, not on macro per se. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I will call it macro when you can see details that you can't see with the eye alone.
Did you figure out how to remove the halos? _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
coase
Joined: 08 Aug 2016 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
coase wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
I will call it macro when you can see details that you can't see with the eye alone.
Did you figure out how to remove the halos? |
The title of my post was "Making a stack" I didn't even emphasize macro so you can call it what you want and I'll call it what I want.
As for the halos, they improved with greater depth of field in each shot and using a shorter focal length lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
3dpan
Joined: 05 Nov 2017 Posts: 65 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
3dpan wrote:
Image stacking, or Focus Stacking to be more precise, is usually associated with close-up/macro/micro photography but I don't see why it cannot be applied creatively to any image maybe even a landscape for example (assuming no subject movement) to increase the depth of field of a foreground object but still retaining a diminishing focus on the background to also ideally give a dreamy bokeh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3215 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
Ray Parkhurst wrote: |
Himself wrote: |
If you shoot with a lens capable of going 1:1 it doesn't mean you'll end up with macro pictures. Neither of your examples fall into that category. Macro that is. Zerene is more macro/micro oriented software.
And I'm a member on that forum for a few good years. I wouldn't dare to say decades as Klaus did - he's very old, Mathusalem related - but I never had problems with them. Freackingly knowledgeable those guys. |
The definition of "macro" is not set in stone. Some folks like to say it's at least 1:1, but for quite some time it was considered 1:2, and many folks consider 1:4 macro. Don't get so hung up on such a definition. I personally look at watch and similar photos as "macro" and many others do as well. There are of course folks who stick with an artificial definition of macro as 1:1 and above, and more power to them, but they should not impose this artificial limit upon others.
|
Nothing is set in stone Ray.
But I do wonder whether your coins are macro 1:1 or 1:4? Or some macro in between? Just rhetorical, thinking out loud.
As for the watch, it's a close up all the way. Looks good, no glare, it's expensive, a Vacheron Constantin after all, but it's a close up. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst
Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 497 Location: Santa Clara, CA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst wrote:
Himself wrote: |
Ray Parkhurst wrote: |
Himself wrote: |
If you shoot with a lens capable of going 1:1 it doesn't mean you'll end up with macro pictures. Neither of your examples fall into that category. Macro that is. Zerene is more macro/micro oriented software.
And I'm a member on that forum for a few good years. I wouldn't dare to say decades as Klaus did - he's very old, Mathusalem related - but I never had problems with them. Freackingly knowledgeable those guys. |
The definition of "macro" is not set in stone. Some folks like to say it's at least 1:1, but for quite some time it was considered 1:2, and many folks consider 1:4 macro. Don't get so hung up on such a definition. I personally look at watch and similar photos as "macro" and many others do as well. There are of course folks who stick with an artificial definition of macro as 1:1 and above, and more power to them, but they should not impose this artificial limit upon others.
|
Nothing is set in stone Ray.
But I do wonder whether your coins are macro 1:1 or 1:4? Or some macro in between? Just rhetorical, thinking out loud.
As for the watch, it's a close up all the way. Looks good, no glare, it's expensive, a Vacheron Constantin after all, but it's a close up. |
My coin shots vary a lot in magnification. Some are around 0.33:1 for the larger coins like Dollars or Crowns. Cents are around 0.7:1. I shoot variety detail shots typically at 3x, 5x or 10x, and occasionally do some small detail shots at 20x. All of these shots are macros. There is no magical "cutoff" that defines whether a shot is a macro or a closeup or a "normal" shot. What matters is whether the shot is of an object that has details smaller than can be seen with the naked eye. _________________ ...See my Numismatic Photography website at: http://www.macrocoins.com
...Primary Studio Cameras: Sony A7Rm4 and Canon HRT2i
...Go-To studio lenses: Nikon 95mm and 105mm Printing-Nikkors; Schneider 85mm Macro-Varon; Nikon 5x, 10x, and 20x Measuring Microscope Objectives; Mitutoyo BD Plan Apo 50x Microscope Objective
...My Go-To Walkaround Lenses: Laowa 60mm Super Macro; Nikon 28-105D (in manual mode for macro); |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Freackingly????? only in Canada eh? _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3215 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
kryss wrote: |
Freackingly????? only in Canada eh? |
No sir!
Only in Québec _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Touche. _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
konicamera
Joined: 03 May 2009 Posts: 746 Location: Warsaw, Poland
Expire: 2014-06-14
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
konicamera wrote:
kryss wrote: |
Freackingly????? only in Canada eh? |
"Pity" _________________
L'homme s'ennuie du bien, cherche le mieux, trouve le mal, et s'y soummet, crainte du pire. - Duc François-Gaston de Lévis
While it is nice to be important, it's more important to be nice.
URL: www.konicafiles.com
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|