Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Sharpness WO: Primotar 135mm f3.5 vs Trioplan 100mm
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:09 pm    Post subject: Sharpness WO: Primotar 135mm f3.5 vs Trioplan 100mm Reply with quote

Hi,
which of the two lenses is in your opinion sharper WO? Is the difference, if any, noticeable to the naked eye?

Thanks.


PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 5:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Primotar is a sharper from what I remember from my comparison original image size, but has less pronunced soap bubbles.
The soap bubbles are made by spherical aberration, an image aberration. So the more spherical aberration, the more loss of sharpness.


Soap bubble lens comparison, Trioplan, Diaplan, Primotar, Nikkor DC

Here some not linked full sized images, same camera -object distance and both full open:
Trioplan 100mm f/2.8
Primotar 135mm f/3.5


PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 12:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you.
Can you also tell me which one in your opinion is sharper stopped down, say at f8?


PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stopped down?
I even don´t know how to stop them down Wink
No, I can not give you this information, don´t know if I tested it. Likely not.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smile


PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't say anything about the Trioplan but the Primotar is not a very sharp lens. It's ok stopped down but you wouldn't want a lens like that for stopped down shooting and in any case you wouldn't use it in situations where absolute sharpness is very important. If it is of any help, I compared a few 135mm lenses on an aps-c crop digital camera a while ago:

Test 1: https://www.flickr.com/photos/8800601@N04/28997606131/sizes/o/
Test 2: https://www.flickr.com/photos/8800601@N04/28453201574/sizes/o/
Test 3: https://www.flickr.com/photos/8800601@N04/28492663463/sizes/o/


PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Trioplan is not sharp wide open but that's not what you get it for. It's the bubble bokeh. Smile


PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok, i must say that i never did that before... Wink

Primotar 135mm, @ f 8


Trioplan 100mm, @ f 8


and some Primotar 135mm bubbles wide open


PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks.
I see no difference Smile


PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sharpness may probably go for Primotar in case of two comparable copies or they are tied. Trioplan is way more handy universal creative lens of great combination of mm, f and mfd, so grab one when you have that chance

On the other hand there is a guy named Valpi on Flickr. That one masters the Primotar, that guy's a new age Monet Very Happy


PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could not find him, do you have a link?


PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He renamed. It is somewhere here
https://www.flickr.com/photos/valpil58/albums


PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also have one CLAed 135mm Exa Zebra Primotar for sale ($125) if you want to (or 180mm Exa Black, working, but as-is no CLA)





PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marek wrote:
I also have one CLAed 135mm Exa Zebra Primotar for sale ($125) if you want to (or 180mm Exa Black, working, but as-is no CLA)

Thanks, two days ago I decide to buy the Trioplan from a German seller on ebay. Let us see.