View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
edwliang
Joined: 24 Jul 2015 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:10 am Post subject: meyer optic gorlitz primoplan 58mm f1.9 versions |
|
|
edwliang wrote:
hi anyone knows how many versions of primoplan 58 1.9 and what type of glass they use for each version?
i have never seen such articles in english describing the versions or history of primoplan 58mm as detailed as many articles in chinese.
for the chinese articles i have read, they said there were 11 versions of primoplan 58mm. And the serial nr. from 6 digits to '112xxxx' (7 digits) use very high quality rare glass (in chinese articles, they called 'Hugo Glass'). From serial nr. 113xxxx on there is 'Optic' marked on the lens and since then they have been using cheap glass instead.
i just want to make sure if these articles are telling the truth? because i have never read similar information in english.
i have a primoplan on hand, s/n 117xxxx, and the seller told me this version also uses 'Hugo Glass', which means very rare glass. anyone knows if this is correct? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Yours is the postwar 'mini version' made in the early 1950s. It is very unlikely they use the glass from the pre-war time. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
Although I am certainly not knowledgeable about the Primoplan, I would suggest you should not let yourself be influenced by talk of "cheap" glass.
Optical glass - as we all know very well - comes in many varieties some of which, even before WWII, had complex fomulae and were very difficult to make. Wastage was sometimes high and the costs considerable. Remember that the cost of the glass for even one element is multiplied in the process of costing the entire manufacturing and marketing process. Optical glass makers have continually tried to achieve similar results with simpler formulae and/or production methods, so that achieving "cheaper glass" may actually be a mark of superior design and manufacturing technology.
The Primoplan was made in what became East Germany after WWII and - with all due respect to calvin33 - it is possible that the Schott glassworks might have used the original pre-1939 materials. Wthout access to factory records, which in any case may no longer exist, it is difficult to know for certain when, or if, changes were made. _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
I have seen from many sellers(especially those from the the former Soviet Union and China) saying they are selling a lens made from the glass/materiel from pre-war stocks. This include but not limit the the Jupiter 3/8/9, the post-war Meyer Trioplan/Primoplan and CZJ Sonnar 50/85. Without access to factory records, I would say only the first(few) post-war batches are likely using the old materials.
In your case, you copy does not belong to the first(few) batches.
P.S. There are many than 11 versions if you count every little change as one version(see here http://ifeeling.net/?p=621). _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edwliang
Joined: 24 Jul 2015 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
edwliang wrote:
calvin83 wrote: |
I have seen from many sellers(especially those from the the former Soviet Union and China) saying they are selling a lens made from the glass/materiel from pre-war stocks. This include but not limit the the Jupiter 3/8/9, the post-war Meyer Trioplan/Primoplan and CZJ Sonnar 50/85. Without access to factory records, I would say only the first(few) post-war batches are likely using the old materials.
In your case, you copy does not belong to the first(few) batches.
P.S. There are many than 11 versions if you count every little change as one version(see here http://ifeeling.net/?p=621). |
thank you so much for the info. are there any articles introducing Meyer Gorlitz or Primoplan's history in English version?
according to articles in Chinese, yes, mine is not belong to the batches using so called 'Hugo Glass'(chinese saying, dunno wht it called in english). they said the rarest batch was serial nr. 10xxxxx-112xxxx, which is using not only Strong transmittance Glass, but also coating to get the best optical result. and that was before 'Optic' appeared in the brand name. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
That's more or less all:
http://home.arcor.de/cpqrst3/index.html
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Meyer
Unfortunately most of the information is in German only. Maybe you can try to translate German pages into English by web services:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer-Optik
The last part and evidence of Meyer Optik disappeared apprx. 1991 as it was not possible to relaunch that company with success after the end of the GDR regime.
Obviously the new produced Meyer lenses are a prodoct of an Dutch company which bought the brand name sometimes around 2014. That seems to be a different story and it's not clear to me where and how those new lenses are produced. Actually it's a software and marketing company. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edwliang
Joined: 24 Jul 2015 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
edwliang wrote:
thank you all. it seems it is not easy to know when exactly Meyer Primoplan stopped using 'special glass'. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edwliang
Joined: 24 Jul 2015 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
edwliang wrote:
anyone actually did some comparison b/w the pre-war and post-war version's glass?
here's my primoplan
[img]
[/img]
[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
valjo
Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Posts: 68 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
valjo wrote:
_________________ Canon D60
3.5/135 Jupiter 37A |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Forget about the glass thing. We judge the lens by its performance, not by when its glass produced or who made the glass. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sajualex1
Joined: 11 Sep 2011 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
sajualex1 wrote:
I got a primoplan in exakta mount and the serial starting from 111xxxx, Is this one a prewar version or post war? Any inputs? _________________ Sony Nex 6,
Meyer Orestor 100mm 2.8, Meyer 58mm 1.9 Primoplan, Optik cyclop 85mm/1.5 M42, Fujinon 50mm 1.2, Vivitar 135mm 2.8 Preset, Tokina 135mm 2.8, HELIOS 44-2 2/58 M42,Helios 44 58mm f/2 M39, Meyer Trioplan 50mm 2.9, Meyer Primotar 50mm 2.8, Petri Orikkor 50mm F/2, Isco Mat Lm 35mm 2.8, Konica Hexanon EE 50mm1.7, Soligor CD 20mm 2.8, Soligor 24mm 2.5, Pentacon Auto 50mm 1.8, Takumar 55mm 1.8,Yashica DSB 55mm f/2, Carl ziess pancolar 50mm 1.8 Zebra, Pentacon MC 29mm 2.8, Carl ziess Pancolar 50mm 1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
with V => post war _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sajualex1
Joined: 11 Sep 2011 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
sajualex1 wrote:
Thanks, I was thinking that this lens has old serial number, so might be a prewar version or may be produced at the time of war. _________________ Sony Nex 6,
Meyer Orestor 100mm 2.8, Meyer 58mm 1.9 Primoplan, Optik cyclop 85mm/1.5 M42, Fujinon 50mm 1.2, Vivitar 135mm 2.8 Preset, Tokina 135mm 2.8, HELIOS 44-2 2/58 M42,Helios 44 58mm f/2 M39, Meyer Trioplan 50mm 2.9, Meyer Primotar 50mm 2.8, Petri Orikkor 50mm F/2, Isco Mat Lm 35mm 2.8, Konica Hexanon EE 50mm1.7, Soligor CD 20mm 2.8, Soligor 24mm 2.5, Pentacon Auto 50mm 1.8, Takumar 55mm 1.8,Yashica DSB 55mm f/2, Carl ziess pancolar 50mm 1.8 Zebra, Pentacon MC 29mm 2.8, Carl ziess Pancolar 50mm 1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
I did compare prewar/postwar Primoplan 75 lenses. Prewar - sharp, more "normal", not coated, postwar - unsharp but lightweight, extremely soft, coated, provides soap bubble bokeh.
Collector-wise, the value of prewars raises significantly, whereas early vs. late postwar doesnt really much matter.
The main differences, excluding value, is (prewar): heavy brass design, Hugo Meyer label, cm instead of mm, 6-letters s/n, no red V, often better optical performance and generally cooler soon-to-be-antique look. No M42 screw unless crafted, just bayonets, or very rare M39 Leica. _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sajualex1
Joined: 11 Sep 2011 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
sajualex1 wrote:
Thank you Marek for the details. appreciate.. _________________ Sony Nex 6,
Meyer Orestor 100mm 2.8, Meyer 58mm 1.9 Primoplan, Optik cyclop 85mm/1.5 M42, Fujinon 50mm 1.2, Vivitar 135mm 2.8 Preset, Tokina 135mm 2.8, HELIOS 44-2 2/58 M42,Helios 44 58mm f/2 M39, Meyer Trioplan 50mm 2.9, Meyer Primotar 50mm 2.8, Petri Orikkor 50mm F/2, Isco Mat Lm 35mm 2.8, Konica Hexanon EE 50mm1.7, Soligor CD 20mm 2.8, Soligor 24mm 2.5, Pentacon Auto 50mm 1.8, Takumar 55mm 1.8,Yashica DSB 55mm f/2, Carl ziess pancolar 50mm 1.8 Zebra, Pentacon MC 29mm 2.8, Carl ziess Pancolar 50mm 1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brendan
Joined: 21 Mar 2017 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
brendan wrote:
I know I am resurrecting an old thread here...
Marek wrote: |
The main differences, excluding value, is (prewar): heavy brass design, Hugo Meyer label, cm instead of mm, 6-letters s/n, no red V, often better optical performance and generally cooler soon-to-be-antique look. No M42 screw unless crafted, just bayonets, or very rare M39 Leica. |
I would add that the lens I am trying to learn more about in the thread below appears to be prewar (sn in the 600,000 range) and the focal length is in inches, not cm or mm.
http://forum.mflenses.com/meyer-gorlitz-1-9-58mm-pre-war-t77029.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|