View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BeardsAreBest
Joined: 09 May 2014 Posts: 286 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 11:03 am Post subject: Infrared Converted cameras and MF lenses |
|
|
BeardsAreBest wrote:
Just jumped in the ocean of infrared with a nex7 converted 715nm.
Tamron 28mm f2.8 not a winner here.
Canon 24mm f2.8 hmmmmm... better but...
Samyang 14mm f2.8............. BoooooYarrrrrr!
Second shot and gots me craving the daytime!!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Snodge
Joined: 01 Jan 2015 Posts: 163 Location: Bristol, UK
Expire: 2016-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Snodge wrote:
Awesome! Infrared can be such fun, not so much trying to find lenses that work with IR though! _________________ Hugh
Camera bodies: Fujifilm X-E3 (digital), Praktika Super TL1000 (35mm film), Kershaw 450 (medium format 6x6 folder)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
You have the filter in front of the sensor instead of in front of the lens?
(I guess that, because it's hard to use a filter on lenses like Samyang 14mm)
I have a full range modified NEX-5N. Using an UV/IR-Cut filter you can use it like a normal camera
UV/IR-Cut filter, Rodenstock Trinar 75/4.5 enlarger lens on bellows
DSC00016
+Schott UG1 + UV led torch
Silver Orchid UV
It also drastically improves low light performance so I used it a lot filterless for festival/party photography. A candle becomes a torch light etc.. Depending on light source, it doesn't even look very unnatural _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Olympus Zuiko 3.5.28 and 2.8/35 both work well for IR as does the plain old CZJ Tessar 2.8/50. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 905 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
Most lenses work reasonably well for infra red, under the right conditions.
Hot spots are the only real problem, and they depend heavily on lighting & aperture.
With adapted lenses it's often possible to fit the filter in the adapter, but it can affect the focus. (I'm still experimenting) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
I ve been thinking of modifying my Nikon D50 to IR for some time as is mostly "collecting dust", but the cost is a bit high and no easy DIY solutions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
imagedit
Joined: 17 May 2014 Posts: 92 Location: London, england
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
imagedit wrote:
tomasg wrote: |
I ve been thinking of modifying my Nikon D50 to IR for some time as is mostly "collecting dust", but the cost is a bit high and no easy DIY solutions. |
Worth a go
http://www.lifepixel.com/tutorials/infrared-diy-tutorials/nikon-d50 _________________ My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pete
Joined: 01 Feb 2011 Posts: 240 Location: Denver, San Jose
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pete wrote:
Haven't used infrared since digital came around but most of my MF Nikon lenses have a small red dot on the focus scale. You would focus through the viewfinder then move the focus point to the red dot for infrared. Because of this and the fact that the focus point needs to be manually readjusted, I would think that the MF lenses would be the best choice.
Pete _________________ "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!!!"
www.pete.3rdtrick.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
No need to convert a D50, all the Nikon 6mp DSLRs work fine for IR unmodified, you just have to use a tripod and a long exposure of a few seconds. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57850 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
_________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 905 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
Pete wrote: |
Haven't used infrared since digital came around but most of my MF Nikon lenses have a small red dot on the focus scale. You would focus through the viewfinder then move the focus point to the red dot for infrared. Because of this and the fact that the focus point needs to be manually readjusted, I would think that the MF lenses would be the best choice.
Pete |
All my native AF lenses focus fine on my 'full spectrum' converted camera, no adjustment required - even with severe IR filters fitted. It's one of the benefits of mirrorless for IR another is being able see to frame/focus IR with no visible light getting through the lens, as the EVF shows what the sensor sees whatever wavelength.
The same is true with non-converted mirrorless models but nailing the focusing could be a problem (the noise in the viewfinder goes through the roof) - most subjects are probably too dark for AF if the cameras not modified. Older lenses with an IR mark certainly do help considerably if the cameras not converted. I did get reasonable results with a kit zoom (no IR mark) when I first tried IR with a standard G1 & more recently with the G5 when I wanted a long exposure.:
Distant London EyeR by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
Yes i know that service and was thinking of giving it a try, but so far i was put off by the warnings. Re-thinking everything, it s probably doable otherwise why would they show the tutorial a all?
Tomas |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
No need to convert a D50, all the Nikon 6mp DSLRs work fine for IR unmodified, you just have to use a tripod and a long exposure of a few seconds. |
Yes Ian i know that, it s just that carriying a tripod around it s not my style of photography. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 905 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
tomasg wrote: |
Yes Ian i know that, it s just that carriying a tripod around it s not my style of photography. |
I very rarely carry one either, but sometimes a table top tripod, or just a folded jacket can work wonders
I have to admit that having a converted camera does make IR a lot more appealing. I brought a pre-converted camera, which worked out cheaper than modifying my backup DSLR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
imagedit
Joined: 17 May 2014 Posts: 92 Location: London, england
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
imagedit wrote:
tomasg wrote: |
Yes i know that service and was thinking of giving it a try, but so far i was put off by the warnings. Re-thinking everything, it s probably doable otherwise why would they show the tutorial a all?
Tomas |
I bought a Panasonic gf1 for cheap (£50) so i could try their tutorial, worked out and was easy to follow.
I might eventually get a sony nex to have another go.
I do like not having a tripod, just point, take the shot and go. _________________ My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
I have a converted Canon G3 that has "only" a 4 MPix sensor but which is good enough for my IR shots.
IR needs sun and clouds to really impress - an leaves or other green plants.
_________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008 Posts: 488 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
imagedit wrote: |
tomasg wrote: |
Yes i know that service and was thinking of giving it a try, but so far i was put off by the warnings. Re-thinking everything, it s probably doable otherwise why would they show the tutorial a all?
Tomas |
I bought a Panasonic gf1 for cheap (�50) so i could try their tutorial, worked out and was easy to follow.
I might eventually get a sony nex to have another go.
I do like not having a tripod, just point, take the shot and go. |
I've converted a few mirrorless cameras to IR. I think I will convert more!!!
One thing about NEX (NEX-3, NEX-5)... Unlike Panasonic where it's easy to remove the IR blocking filter, it's glued in those NEX, so I wasn't game to try to crack the glue. I think micro 4/3 or the Canon M are better for conversion. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
imagedit
Joined: 17 May 2014 Posts: 92 Location: London, england
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
imagedit wrote:
dnas wrote: |
I've converted a few mirrorless cameras to IR. I think I will convert more!!!
One thing about NEX (NEX-3, NEX-5)... Unlike Panasonic where it's easy to remove the IR blocking filter, it's glued in those NEX, so I wasn't game to try to crack the glue. I think micro 4/3 or the Canon M are better for conversion. |
Good to know _________________ My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
IR needs sun and clouds to really impress - an leaves or other green plants. |
Yes, I have noticed that in a number of very nice IR shots I have seen.
LucisPictor wrote: |
|
I especially like that second one, Carsten -- very impressive contrasts !!! _________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:01 am Post subject: Re: Infrared Converted cameras and MF lenses |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
[quote="BeardsAreBest"[/quote]
Wow !!! That image really seems to have a magical 3-D effect. (It must have a lot of pixie dust.) ( ) _________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeardsAreBest
Joined: 09 May 2014 Posts: 286 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
BeardsAreBest wrote:
White christmas from the samyang
My favourite planet from sigma 24mm superwide II
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Snodge
Joined: 01 Jan 2015 Posts: 163 Location: Bristol, UK
Expire: 2016-12-27
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Snodge wrote:
Did you decide you wanted the ability to have false colour images before you had the camera converted? I keep pondering a conversion but I can't decide if I will end up just sticking to mono, and therefore getting the 830nm conversion... _________________ Hugh
Camera bodies: Fujifilm X-E3 (digital), Praktika Super TL1000 (35mm film), Kershaw 450 (medium format 6x6 folder)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BeardsAreBest
Joined: 09 May 2014 Posts: 286 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BeardsAreBest wrote:
Wanted to do both false color and black&white. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
IR needs sun and clouds to really impress - an leaves or other green plants.
|
add to that body of water (lake,river) and it takes it up a notch _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16552 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Nice works guys!! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|