View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 894
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:54 am Post subject: kjhg. |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
mnb _________________ Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum ....
Last edited by francotirador on Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:43 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7547 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
They are different. Which is the best is up to the choice of the photographer. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zeeke
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 174 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zeeke wrote:
I would choose Prakticar which should be the same as Flektogon and a safe bett. _________________ Pentax Ks1
Fuji XT10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 894
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
Zeeke wrote: |
I would choose Prakticar which should be the same as Flektogon and a safe bett. |
I had the 35mm f2.4 Flektogon. And while I liked the handling of midtones he has amazed not me. I changed it for Distagon. Right now he appeared for sale a new Prakticar, and is the latest version and has the most complex Coating. But I think the Fujinon a better definition and Bokeh although I have not experienced. In the group I found nothing. _________________ Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 901 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
calvin83 wrote: |
They are different. Which is the best is up to the choice of the photographer. |
Exactly!
Best for one shot will often not be best for another.
There are so many variables in lens design some of which are mutually exclusive, requiring compromises.
Even lens flaws can work to improve the image in some cases, especially if a dreamy image is wanted. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 894
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
DConvert wrote: |
calvin83 wrote: |
They are different. Which is the best is up to the choice of the photographer. |
Exactly!
Best for one shot will often not be best for another.
There are so many variables in lens design some of which are mutually exclusive, requiring compromises.
Even lens flaws can work to improve the image in some cases, especially if a dreamy image is wanted. |
There are quality standards, such as definition, bokeh, response to the highlights, midtones range. There who likes the Helios 58 2.0 and is a bad lens. No wonder about personal taste, if not, on those quality standards that makes Objectively better lens to another.
I ask anyone knows the Fujinon EBC 35 mm 1.9?
Best regards. _________________ Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
35/2,4 has good close focus, some say it's macro lens in disguise, while Fujinon 35/1,9 has very long MFD ( someone tempted me, once, but long MFD isn't for me)
So if you like to shoot closer, you what to choose _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 894
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
IAZA wrote: |
35/2,4 has good close focus, some say it's macro lens in disguise, while Fujinon 35/1,9 has very long MFD ( someone tempted me, once, but long MFD isn't for me)
So if you like to shoot closer, you what to choose |
Thank you so much IAZA
Macro I do not, so I think I incline by the EBC Fujinon 35 1.9
In the examples I saw, it has more 3D effect, and higher definition.
Best regards
Sergio _________________ Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|