View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:48 am Post subject: Fuji Instax Mini |
|
|
miran wrote:
I just ordered a Fuji Instax Mini 8 camera for my daughter's birthday. She'll be five and wanted "a camera out of which ready made photos come out" (her description). I guess she must have seen something like this in a cartoon or something. Has anyone here used instax cameras? Any thoughts? _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Yes, I have a Instax 210 which is a monster camera. However, it produces what it is supposed to do.
For certain circumstances a quite usable camera.
I have also produced some scans from the pictures but unfortunately I don't find them now....
However, they didn't look that bad at all. I was positively surprised.
At least it's a nice toy for your daughter. The only problem are the running costs, i.e. the cost per picture is relatively high when you look at the cost of small printed pictures from any digital camera in comparison. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
Well, the mini is a smaller version of the regular instax. Apparently very popular in Asia. Yes, the cost is close to ridiculous, especially considering it's really just a toy more than anything else. But my daughter has a very entrepeneuring spirit. I think she'll be selling the photos 1 euro a piece to cover the costs.
Anyway, we'll see how it goes. _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick1779
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 1207 Location: Italy
Expire: 2014-06-06
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rick1779 wrote:
Yes! I have the Mini 90 (actually my girlfriend has it) and it's really funny, later on I've also bought the Instax Printer and I use both in weddings http://www.itstimetodream.it/2015/09/wedding-instax-gift/ _________________ TELLTALE
Last edited by Rick1779 on Wed Oct 07, 2015 1:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick1779
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 1207 Location: Italy
Expire: 2014-06-06
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rick1779 wrote:
You can also open an Instagram account for her and let her become famous like the son of the NG photographer Aaron Huey https://instagram.com/hawkeyehuey/?hl=en _________________ TELLTALE
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
I've got (and really like) the Instax Wide 210:
https://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/?s=Instax
And I have also shot with my old Polaroid 630 and an Impossible Black&White film:
https://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/2015/07/23/der-mit-abstand-teuerste-film/
https://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/2015/08/11/erinnern-sie-sich/
Yes, it's in German, but you can try Google translate. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
!Karen
Joined: 20 Jul 2013 Posts: 837 Location: Belgium Baby
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
!Karen wrote:
I have both the 210 and a mini
they are fun, but rather big and awkwardly shaped to carry around, even the mini (imo)
Still, the instax film delivers very good results, much better than the impossible film _________________ FLICKR PHOTOSTREAM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
Thanks all! Yeah, the size of these things is what worries me a bit. We'll see how it goes. And yes, she'll soon be a famous photographer with an extensive portfolio of photographs of tiny feet. _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1840 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
I have used a mini for a while, just out of curiosity. You'll be surprised about the film/photo quality! I really was, especially since i had used a Polaroid Image system with Impossible film before.... and that was a great disappointment (for me).
These pics were taken with a nex, photo flat on the table, the real ones look better, but you get the idea! (i hope)
Fuji Instax Mini 1 by René Maly, on Flickr
Fuji Instax Mini 3 by René Maly, on Flickr _________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
That's a sample picture from my Instax 210. The original picture is apprx. 60 x 95 mm.
Scanned with Epson Perfection V600 Photo and PP in LR. Downsized for presentation (original size 9.000 px wide).
That's not really bad as this is already apprx. 5 times bigger on screen than on paper picture. The original scan is already more than soft as obviously far too big.
It's obviously better to scan with lower resolution. However, the picture is only downsized and exposure corrected but neither sharpened nor noise filtered. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
Thanks. I think quality will be good enough, but it's not #1 priority anyway. I wish they made a normal camera with manual controls and quality lens for the instax films. I'm sure there would be a market for that and not much more expensive to make. All the cameras on the market so far seem to be more or less toys. _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick1779
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 1207 Location: Italy
Expire: 2014-06-06
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rick1779 wrote:
miran wrote: |
Thanks. I think quality will be good enough, but it's not #1 priority anyway. I wish they made a normal camera with manual controls and quality lens for the instax films. I'm sure there would be a market for that and not much more expensive to make. All the cameras on the market so far seem to be more or less toys. |
Well, something like that already exists...
http://shop.lomography.com/it/cameras/lomo-instant-montenegro _________________ TELLTALE
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
I know about that, but I'm talking about actual quality gear that would use the instax film, not cameras from a company whos image is built on "vintage" low quality photography. _________________ my flickr stream |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1840 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2015 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
miran wrote: |
Thanks. I wish they made a normal camera with manual controls and quality lens for the instax films. I'm sure there would be a market for that and not much more expensive to make. All the cameras on the market so far seem to be more or less toys. |
Yes, i thought that too after i had used the plastic Fuji camera. The lenses used aren't of high quality and they show circular rings of flare / reflections when under a certain angle to the light source. You can see them in the lighthouse shot i posted before.
Wouldn't it be nice to have some universal body for Instax film, like the NEX system, so you can choose your own lenses? _________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
Just a quick report. This thing is a total hit! The photos are indeed very small and kind of lo-fi, but the fun factor more than outweighs any negatives. It was a complete success at the birthday party. Mostly it was my daughter snapping this and that and group portraits of everybody and so on. And every time this little piece of blank white paper would come out, she'd put it on the table and everybody would gather round to wait and watch the image slowly appear. So precious!
NEX6_0002_7733 by Miran Amon, on Flickr _________________ my flickr stream
Last edited by miran on Fri Oct 30, 2015 7:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Seriously, I didn't expect something else. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
And the cam even looks good. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5077 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
_________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pete
Joined: 01 Feb 2011 Posts: 240 Location: Denver, San Jose
|
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pete wrote:
Funny, it was Edmund Land's daughter that wanted a camera in 1948 that she did not have to wait for pictures. He went on to create the instant Polaroid cameras. Instant film is still fun and I think you will get as much enjoyment as she does. I currently shoot the Fuji packfilm but I know someday they will stop making it and I will have to switch to Instax. Lomography is making a pretty nice interchangeable lens camera and they also make Instax backs. My plan is to graft an Instax back onto one of my Polaroid roll film cameras. The Instax is still quite popular and it should be available for a long time.
Pete _________________ "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!!!"
www.pete.3rdtrick.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
What is the longevity on these instant pictures? I have never used or seen a Polaroid camera in the flesh : ) _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pete
Joined: 01 Feb 2011 Posts: 240 Location: Denver, San Jose
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pete wrote:
mo wrote: |
What is the longevity on these instant pictures? I have never used or seen a Polaroid camera in the flesh : ) |
I don't know about the Instax but I have several FP100 pictures that look as good as they did several years ago. Once they are scanned, it really does not matter. When they do age, they get better...
[img]Polaroid Found 1 by Pete Lach, on Flickr[/img] _________________ "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!!!"
www.pete.3rdtrick.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Not bad at all,it helps its a great subject . I forgot about the scanning of film, good to know it works well with these instant photos as well. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pete
Joined: 01 Feb 2011 Posts: 240 Location: Denver, San Jose
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pete wrote:
I found that in an old camera case. It is probably close to 50 years old. I would guess that modern films would be an improvement.
Pete _________________ "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!!!"
www.pete.3rdtrick.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
No doubt they would, but there's a certain "look" to those old polaroids. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|