| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 628
Location: New Zealand
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:28 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
(sellers pic)
I won an auction for an F2 Luxon lens for Braun Paxette, a quite rare lens. This model of Paxette did not have rangefinder coupling so I'm not sure if the lens is usable in that mode on another Paxette model.
edit: It appears to be a fairly interesting lens, with a design somwhat akin to the Meyer Primoplan 58mm lens, samples online show "character":
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hawkpeng2003/sets/72157623887814462/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/david_davidoff/albums/72157628188405051/
Japanese links can be read in english using Chrome browser:
https://spiral--m42-blogspot-com.translate.goog/2019/01/roeschlein-kreutznach-luxon-50mm-f2.html?_x_tr_sl=ja&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=sc
https://pakira3-sakura-ne-jp.translate.goog/wp/?p=103784&_x_tr_sl=ja&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=sc
Last edited by Alun Thomas on Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:43 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020
Posts: 987
Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
| kds315* wrote: |
WOW, 6.000 replies - quite record this is!!  |
...and counting 
Sigma mini-zoom 39-80mm f3.5 twin ring.
Looks like constant aperture maybe.
Will know more after a bit of a chance to shoot with it.
Cheap from a camera shop.
Given the short zoom range, it should perform.
The macro ring works very well.
It seems sharp mounted on the D-810.
Here it is again with a Tokina 80-200 f3.5-4.5 macro zoom bought at the same time and place.
Aperture is a bit wonky in the Tokina.
Tokina seemed very sharp at the 40 foot/12 meter mark.
I'll have a bit more on both after some shots are made.
-D.S.
_________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7553
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
 
The Luxon is even more rare than the Quinon. 
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013
Posts: 1552
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
| Quote: |
The Luxon is even more rare than the Quinon. |
Very nice indeed! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013
Posts: 1552
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
My latest is a Rikenon 50mm f2 m42. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
New batch from Japan:
 SMC Pentax 50mm 1:1.4 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 SMC Pentax 50mm 1:1.4 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Early version of the SMC Pentax 50mm 1:1.4 with Thoriated glass
 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 55mm 1:1.8 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 55mm 1:1.8 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Didn't have this one yet in S-M-C (but the SMC version was the first vintage lens I bought).
 Takumar 135mm 1:3.5 V1 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Takumar 135mm 1:3.5 V1 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Replacing a very stiff focussing first copy
 SMC Pentax-M zoom 40-80mm 1:2.8-4.0 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 SMC Pentax-M zoom 40-80mm 1:2.8-4.0 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Adding to my Pentax-M collection
 SMC Pentax-F 35-105mm 1:4-5.6 by The lens profile, on Flickr
replacement for broken copy that was stuck at 35mm.
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2022 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Still in Japan. Just arrived at the warehouse today unexpectedly weighing over a 1kg. Super Sankor 2.5 inch 1.9 projection lens.
 so now I have to create another package since it won't fit in the one I had meant it for. Looking for cheap lenses with free shipping in Japan I don't have yet and aren't utter crap eighties plastic zooms.
Couldn't find any Samples online, but this is for a 2.75 inch 1.9 version https://www.flickr.com/photos/60157365@N00/albums/72157664899135987
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7553
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| D1N0 wrote: |
Still in Japan. Just arrived at the warehouse today unexpectedly weighing over a 1kg. Super Sankor 2.5 inch 1.9 projection lens.
so now I have to create another package since it won't fit in the one I had meant it for. Looking for cheap lenses with free shipping in Japan I don't have yet and aren't utter crap eighties plastic zooms.
Couldn't find any Samples online, but this is for a 2.75 inch 1.9 version https://www.flickr.com/photos/60157365@N00/albums/72157664899135987 |
Expect it will be more less the same.
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10531
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2022 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| kds315* wrote: |
| WOW, 6.000 replies - quite record this is!! |
also 492433 views so far
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020
Posts: 516
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2022 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
Thought I was going to get away with it cheaper, but oh well :p still a good price. Can easily break even selling the YS -> FD adapter.
This is the Sigma Widerama 18mm f3.5. No inbuilt filters.
I'm guessing, + according to this thread http://forum.mflenses.com/spiratone-18mm-rectilinear-three-versions-t32670.html that this was the 2nd Sigma 18mm- the first one being the 'Pluracoat 18mm f3.5' with the 72mm filter thread. From what I understand from the internet, this is the first 'popular one' with widespread ownership.
Mine here might look a little grubby but it literally just looks like dust, certainly obvious with an overexposed shot. The focus markings don't look faded. The aperture markings look a tiny bit worn, but fun fact- that also happened to my mint Sigma 18mm f2.8 Filtermatic (non-XQ, 'last era').
Actually, me having an APS-C camera + Metabones Speedbooster Ultra is more interesting imo than a full frame comparison test. Whilst the Ultra has even less impact on IQ, improvements to tele centricity and the slight (1.1?? 1.05??) crop left over is best it can look. Also I can accurately adjust flange for best performance with the glass... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 628
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2022 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
| eggplant wrote: |
This is the Sigma Widerama 18mm f3.5. No inbuilt filters.
I'm guessing, + according to this thread http://forum.mflenses.com/spiratone-18mm-rectilinear-three-versions-t32670.html that this was the 2nd Sigma 18mm- the first one being the 'Pluracoat 18mm f3.5' with the 72mm filter thread. From what I understand from the internet, this is the first 'popular one' with widespread ownership.
|
The pluracoat lens in the linked thread is actually the Tokina 17/3.5 rebadged to 18mm, some say it was rebadged because Spiratone had already sold the Sigma 18mm F/3.5 and F/3.2 lenses previous to that, and they wanted to keep the same focal length in their catalog, making the #1 lens actually the last released.
Sigma had 3 different 18mm lenses in that period, the release order was said to be F/3.5, F/3.2 then finally an F/2.8 model, the last of which was not sold by Spiratone as far as I am aware. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020
Posts: 516
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2022 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
| Alun Thomas wrote: |
| eggplant wrote: |
This is the Sigma Widerama 18mm f3.5. No inbuilt filters.
I'm guessing, + according to this thread http://forum.mflenses.com/spiratone-18mm-rectilinear-three-versions-t32670.html that this was the 2nd Sigma 18mm- the first one being the 'Pluracoat 18mm f3.5' with the 72mm filter thread. From what I understand from the internet, this is the first 'popular one' with widespread ownership.
|
The pluracoat lens in the linked thread is actually the Tokina 17/3.5 rebadged to 18mm, some say it was rebadged because Spiratone had already sold the Sigma 18mm F/3.5 and F/3.2 lenses previous to that, and they wanted to keep the same focal length in their catalog, making the #1 lens actually the last released.
|
Well, this is curious.
I don't believe this to be the case. I bolded the '72mm filter thread' part because I believe it's an earlier, a different lens:
It has a much larger front element than the Tokina SL 17mm f3.5, which has a 67mm filter thread too.
This is the later Sigma Pluracoat 18mm, which has a 67mm filter thread and smaller element like the Tokina, and the distance markings look closer to Tokina too:
However, this 1979 modern photography review claims the 72mm filter, 18mm f3.5 Pluracoat is the Tokina 17mm f3.5 SL:
Putting aside the styling, which may be more similar to the Tokina now: the front element size is clearly larger. They are different designs.
_________________
UK |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2022 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
This is my Vivitar 17mm 3.5 (Tokina). Seems to be like the second one. Notice the IR mark position.
 Vivitar 17mm 1:3.5 (Tokina) by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Vivitar 17mm 1:3.5 (Tokina) by The lens profile, on Flickr
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 628
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2022 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
It looks like the Tokina 17/3.5 lens was revised for the year 1980, as earlier versions did have a 72mm filter, as seen in this copy I sold a couple of years ago. My spiratone "18mm" lens has an 80#### serial, presumably from 1980, and a 67mm filter thread. Although I only sampled a single copy of each version, the 67mm version was far and away better then the 72mm version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020
Posts: 516
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2022 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
Ahhh- I see. That clears things up. Interesting there's this second version.
I will have to check my Tokina book but it seems to only include the second version, although well documented.
_________________
UK |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1922
Location: Slovenija
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2022 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
on its way
Hexanon 200/3.5
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DonN
Joined: 30 Jul 2017
Posts: 38
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2022 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DonN wrote:
A Trioplan 50mm F/2.9
_________________
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
https://www.instagram.com/nardon/
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10531
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2022 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
I think the Vivitar is identical to Sigma made. What distinguishes as Tokina?
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2022 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
| D1N0 wrote: |
This is my Vivitar 17mm 3.5 (Tokina). Seems to be like the second one. Notice the IR mark position.
I think the Vivitar is identical to Sigma made. What distinguishes as Tokina? |
|
37xxx serial signifies Tokina for Vivitar. Also the chrome ring with red dot at the mount is typical for Tokina lenses (although it was copied by some other companies, but mostly crap second/third rate lenses).
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 628
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2022 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
The serial number starting with '37' on a vivitar lens during that period is recognised as marking a Tokina made lens. The 'Σ' character on the earlier Spiratone lenses was used in that period by Sigma as a serial prefix for many (but not all) of their lenses.
https://www.apotelyt.com/camera-kit/vivitar-catalog
link to Vivitar serial number list.
haha see I've answered a question that was already addressed.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10531
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2022 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
 
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018
Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Too many.
A few ones worth of mentioning.
Konica macro 105/4 with helicoid
Vivitar 90/2.8 (had Elicar and Panagor twins but never owned Vivitar)
Chinon 40-105mm Tamron? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phalbert
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 359
Location: Namibia
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phalbert wrote:
| KEO wrote: |
I don't think I can say enough good things about this one. Wonderful. |
One of my dream lenses...
_________________
🙋 My wishlist: Titan or Idaho 135/1,8 Nikon Df Nikkor 105/1,8 35/1,4 85/1,4
My dream lenses: Zuiko 180/2 Prototype Zuiko 85/1,4
Zeiss CY: 55/1,2 85/1,2
Astro Berlin 250/2 Canon EF 50/1,0 85/1,2
Nikkor 105/1,4 28/1,4
My stolen stuff: Zuiko 24/2 #106874; Zuiko 35-80/2,8 #102180; Zuiko 35/2 #119168; Zuiko 90/2 macro #102858; Zuiko x1,4 converter #102019; Tamron 17/3,5 #400567; Tamron 400/4 #80407; Soligor 135/2 #17506600 Sigma 28/1,8 #1001124 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BnG_Murphy
Joined: 07 Jul 2018
Posts: 42
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BnG_Murphy wrote:
Miranda Auto MC 135mm f2.8 PK mount.
Thought I had a nice bargain until I just realized it can't focus to infinity 😪. Not great at f2.8: some aberrations and the bokeh leans towards being onion ring-like bokeh ballsy. But stopped down to f4 (it only stops down in full stop clicks) it is smoother. Sharpness is good and aberrations aren't a big issue after f2.8. I am hoping there will be a fix to the focusing as it is beating my other 135mm (Pentax-M).
[img]
I also got an Ensinor 135mm f2.8 but it is absolute junk. Horrific IQ. Returning (especially as it also has a barely moveable focus ring).
Last week I got this big beast for a great deal: a Super Takumar 200mm f4 . Then I added a 2x teleconverter. This makes it a fun 600mm on my Fuji APSC camera...
Next up is a Super Multi Coated (radioactive) Super Takumar 55mm f1.8 which will hopefully come tomorrow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marius.zaech
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Posts: 53
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2022 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marius.zaech wrote:
Voigtländer 12mm 5.6 for L39 screw-mount. Came with it's (enormous) original finder... and a Bessa L was attached to it too
I've had the 15mm before but was a bit disappointed by it's performance on the Sony. It's really good on film, but then my only L39 camera was a really beat up Fed2 so it didn't see much use.
The 12mm is not perfect either, it has horrendous vignetting but it's insane angle of view makes up for the extra post-processing time.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
