| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10540
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2021 6:14 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
visualopsins wrote:
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:3.5 / 28 with rectangular hood
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:3.5 / 35
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:2.8 / 120
(re-buying lenses sold long ago)
 Page 200 of thread started by Teo!
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Knudsen
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 115
Location: Indiana
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2021 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Knudsen wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:3.5 / 28 with rectangular hood
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:3.5 / 35
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:2.8 / 120
(re-buying lenses sold long ago)
Page 200 of thread started by Teo! |
Congrats on 28, 35, 120 and 200!
_________________
~Jon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2021 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Don't ever sell a Takumar unless you have a better copy :p
This is the latest one in transit...
 
Bit scratched but looks clear. Well used needs a clean. I'm hoping it has a Hanimex mount instead of a T-mount so I can also use it with my 200/4.5
_________________
pentaxian
Last edited by D1N0 on Tue Sep 21, 2021 12:21 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2021 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| D1N0 wrote: |
Don't ever sell a Takumar unless you have a better copy :p
|
Splendid lenses and excellent advice
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012
Posts: 1782
Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
+1 to that advice, this is probably the third time I've ended up (my telephotos arrived from Japan today Yaaaaay) with each of these lenses. (28, 50, 135, 150, 200mm)
For a while there I sold everything and ended up with some fancy Pentax DA* zoom's (16-50 & 50-135) and yes they were great, the size and weight had me missing these little primes.
And depth of field scales! Gord I missed them.
Anyway you all know that, you are the converted 
Learnt my lesson, I'll keep these for the will.
Last edited by tromboads on Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Posts: 5028
Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
| Page 200 of thread started by Teo! |
must go and buy something! 
_________________
MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RnR
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 283
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
RnR wrote:
| tromboads wrote: |
| Learnt my lesson, I'll keep these for the will. |
Welcome back tromboads
_________________
Currently shooting with Fuji X-E2s + Metabones Speedbooster + m42 and CY glass 💕
Cheers, Hasse |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2925
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| Knudsen wrote: |
| visualopsins wrote: |
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:3.5 / 28 with rectangular hood
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:3.5 / 35
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:2.8 / 120
(re-buying lenses sold long ago)
Page 200 of thread started by Teo! |
Congrats on 28, 35, 120 and 200! |
Nice set indeed. Check here (click twice on picture in Flickr) for the resolution of The Tak 35/3.5 (albeit my version is the 'Super'). You have to stop down a bit though:
 SuperTak3535387 by devoscasper, on Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012
Posts: 1782
Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
Which is your bedroom! 
Cheers RnR, And yes Teo! a reward for sure! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The_WB
Joined: 06 Nov 2020
Posts: 19
Location: Las Vegas, NV USA
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 4:23 pm Post subject: Micro-Nikkor 55MM f/3.5 PC |
|
|
The_WB wrote:
KEH purchase a few days ago. Received it late yesterday. KEH listed it as Excellent, but it appears to be far better condition than described. I have only taken a few test shots thus far with my Canon EOS T5, but they appear to be spot on.
Love these old Nikkor lenses.
#1
#2
#3
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2925
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 4:37 pm Post subject: Re: Micro-Nikkor 55MM f/3.5 PC |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| The_WB wrote: |
KEH purchase a few days ago. Received it late yesterday. KEH listed it as Excellent, but it appears to be far better condition than described. I have only taken a few test shots thus far with my Canon EOS T5, but they appear to be spot on.
Love these old Nikkor lenses.
|
That’s a great lens indeed, and incredibly sharp. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020
Posts: 992
Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
I have the exact same lens, and it see's a lot of use.
The old coatings sometimes have trouble with brilliant reds fringing towards the infinity mark, but it takes a fairly complicated lighting scenario to force the lens to do it.
Last of the flat field formula for this line, but a darn good one.
Enjoy your new lens.
I use mine quite a bit at MFD and hand-held, with an in-focus success rate of about 50/50..
-D.S.
_________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The_WB
Joined: 06 Nov 2020
Posts: 19
Location: Las Vegas, NV USA
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The_WB wrote:
I find the 55MM Micro-Nikkor easier to focus on my Rebel T5 than my Sigma QX 135MM lens. I hope to get years of use out of this lens. The way it is built, I believe I will get my wish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
A pretty mixed bag of lenses from the last few days:
First (at the very left) a Leitz Telyt 20cm1:4.5. It nicley complements my small collection of black Leica "tele" lenses from the 1930s.
Next is a Steinheil Auto-Culmigon 3.5/35mm which came with a very nice and working Praktica IVB.
The Culminon, however, has a strange defect - I can perfectly turn the focusing ring, but the lens system doesn't move out or in!
More interestingly, the front lens is turning when turning the focus ring, but the rear element is not - to me that looks like a "front
focusing lens" since the rear element obvioulsy is fixed. Does anyone know more about this lens??
Then there's anoter "crazy kat" - an Edixa 4.5-5.6/75-300mm "made in Japan" with a Minolta SR mount. Well made mechanically,
but nothing special when it comes to performance. What was it made for? I mean why to label it "Exakta" when it was made in Japan
for Minolta cameras ??
Next the Sigma "delta-III" 2.8-3.5/75-200mm. Nicely made as well (all metal), but optically disappointing, especially at the long end.
While the common OEM tele zooms from that time frame (eg Canon FD 4/80-200mm, Minolta MD 4/70-210mm or Nikkor AiS
4/80-200mm) are 1/2 to 1 f-stop slower, the OEM zooms are much better at f4 than the Sigma at f11 (f=200mm).
Finally two Minolta AF lenses - the classical 4-4.5/28-135mm and the later 2.8/28-75mm, made by Tamron according to Minolta
specifications. I have several MinAF 28-1355mm lenses, but this here is by far the nicest. Actually it looks as if it hadn't been used at
all - which seems possible since it was bought from a local photo store which is closing its doors after being 144 years in the business.
Probably "new old stock", I guess.
Now, how much was all this stuff ...? I let you guess
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10540
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
...
Next is a Steinheil Auto-Culmigon 3.5/35mm which came with a very nice and working Praktica IVB.
The Culminon, however, has a strange defect - I can perfectly turn the focusing ring, but the lens system doesn't move out or in!
More interestingly, the front lens is turning when turning the focus ring, but the rear element is not - to me that looks like a "front
focusing lens" since the rear element obvioulsy is fixed. Does anyone know more about this lens??... |
The recent Super-Macro-Takumar 1:4 / 50 arrived with a similar problem -- the focus ring grub screws were loose. Tightening those fixed it!
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10540
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2021 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:3.5 / 24
Repurchasing sold lenses. I used to really like this lens on Canon Rebel XT -- on 5D caused ERR so I sold it...
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
| stevemark wrote: |
...
Next is a Steinheil Auto-Culmigon 3.5/35mm which came with a very nice and working Praktica IVB.
The Culminon, however, has a strange defect - I can perfectly turn the focusing ring, but the lens system doesn't move out or in!
More interestingly, the front lens is turning when turning the focus ring, but the rear element is not - to me that looks like a "front
focusing lens" since the rear element obvioulsy is fixed. Does anyone know more about this lens??... |
The recent Super-Macro-Takumar 1:4 / 50 arrived with a similar problem -- the focus ring grub screws were loose. Tightening those fixed it! |
Thanks for the hint - but that's not the problem ...!
In fact, the front group is supposed to turn when focusing (as I have found in the meantime). And it even does focus,
but only in the range of about 25 to 20 cm (instead of "infinity" to 80 cm).
It seems there are two threads allowing to move the front group: One intended for focusing, the other one (secured by a tiny,
tiny screw) intended for "infinity" calibration.
Interestingly, the front groups moves only about 0.25mm when focusing from max distance to min distance (barely visible with
the naked eye). With a common 35mm lens you would expect at least 2mm. Thus I mistakenly was thinking that there's no movement at all!
Since the thread for infinity calibration is secured by an extremely small screw, and since the thread itself may be "glued" with
hardened grease, I have to soak both first with solvent before trying to re-calibrate "infinity". If I'll succeed, I'll post some images in the repair forum.
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 902
Location: Essex UK
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
I've recently added a couple of Carl Zeiss Jena Biotars - both only cine lenses one a 12.5mm f/2, the other a 25mm f/2.
I didn't not read the listing carefully when first spotting it, so it turns out they are in the rare Paxette mount rather than d-mount as originally expected. 
DIY adapters for them are now just about usable on my Pentax Q (I think they need ~1mm of shimming for proper infinity focus)
When mounted they'll give 70mm & 140mm equivalent FOV (& only just cover the Q's tiny sensor). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2021 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| DConvert wrote: |
I've recently added a couple of Carl Zeiss Jena Biotars - both only cine lenses one a 12.5mm f/2, the other a 25mm f/2.
I didn't not read the listing carefully when first spotting it, so it turns out they are in the rare Paxette mount rather than d-mount as originally expected.
|
They should give quite good results for macro work when used with a reversing adapter and a bellows,also on larger sensors (APS-C or FF)!
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
benadamx
Joined: 25 Feb 2019
Posts: 329
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
benadamx wrote:
grabbed this at the flea market for $25 without looking at it too closely, just saw that it was a weird old 100/2 and that was good enough, didn't realize what i'd found til i got back to the car and had a real antiques roadshow moment
#1
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012
Posts: 1782
Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
Aaaaaaand for those that aren't sure what we're looking at? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| tromboads wrote: |
| Aaaaaaand for those that aren't sure what we're looking at? |
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Alpa-100mm-f2-Auto-Kinoptik-78313-/283834060215?_ul=IN
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2925
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| benadamx wrote: |
grabbed this at the flea market for $25 without looking at it too closely, just saw that it was a weird old 100/2 and that was good enough, didn't realize what i'd found til i got back to the car and had a real antiques roadshow moment
#1
|
Ha, Incredible!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018
Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 5:41 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 902
Location: Essex UK
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2021 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
| DConvert wrote: |
I've recently added a couple of Carl Zeiss Jena Biotars - both only cine lenses one a 12.5mm f/2, the other a 25mm f/2.
I didn't not read the listing carefully when first spotting it, so it turns out they are in the rare Paxette mount rather than d-mount as originally expected.
|
They should give quite good results for macro work when used with a reversing adapter and a bellows,also on larger sensors (APS-C or FF)!
S |
Good Idea Steve, I'll have to give that a go too!
I think they might take 28mm filters in which case I have a spare stepping ring somewhere that was mis described (38-37 not 30-37) which should enable me to mount them via helicoids/bellows...
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
