| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
connloyalist
Joined: 22 Jul 2020
Posts: 234
Location: the Netherlands
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
connloyalist wrote:
I just took delivery of a Steinheil Tele-Quinar 200mm 4.5 in M42 mount. Yes, it is quite heavy (660 gr). But I am blown away by how sharp it is, even wide open. And the build quality is second to none. My Schneider Kreuznach 200mm 5.5 has just lost its place as the best 200mm lens that I own. Although when I go to the zoo for example I will still be carrying something a little less heavy (the Minolta MDIII 200mm is nice and light weight for such purposes).
This is my first Steinheil, but probably not the last one.
Regards, C. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018
Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
| vivaldibow wrote: |
| Mamiya sekor f.c. 35mm 2.8 for Prismat NP |
Interesting! The only Mamiya with the Exacta bayonet I have is the 1.7/58mm ... Any hints about the optical contruction of the Sekor F.C. 2.8/35mm?
|
Not sure about yet. I might try shining some light into the lens and count the reflection. Would that work?
| stevemark wrote: |
| vivaldibow wrote: |
Rikenon 55mm 1.4, Nikon F mount, for Ricoh Singlex, that comes with the lens. (not identical Nikon F mount). May need to file one of the lugs or find a Nikon to NEX adapter to file the flange. |
I got a Rikenon 1.4/55mm as well, some days ago, abeit with a Pentax M42 screw mount. It's filter ring is dented, but the lens seems to perform well. Not yet thoroughly tested, though!
|
Those Auto Rikenon 55/1.4s together with Sears' I own, seem to have flat rear element. This Rikenon 55/1.4 Nikon F mount's rear element has some visible ring patterns. Will have to test it later.
| stevemark wrote: |
| vivaldibow wrote: |
| I guess the lens is essential a Mamiya 55/1.4. But this one is non radioactive. |
I only have the Mamiya SX 1.4/55mm. That lens certainly has a different optical construction than my Rikenon 1.4/55mm (M42): Similar, but clearly not identical reflexes, and a different diameter of the last lens.
|
I don't own either Mamiya versions (the non SX and SX). I guess the two Mamiya's are different, are they?
Last edited by vivaldibow on Fri Oct 16, 2020 5:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 834
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
Hmm... No glow on mine. To a certain extent and setting aside field curvature one could think it is better wide open than stopped down. Not the case but there is some focus shift that must be taken into account to achieve best performance somewhat closed. Typically if I am close to infinity wide open, maximum sharpness at f5,6 would be around 4,5 meters on the focus ring.
Check yours.
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2020 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
I only have the Mamiya SX 1.4/55mm. That lens certainly has a different optical construction than my Rikenon 1.4/55mm (M42): Similar, but clearly not identical reflexes, and a different diameter of the last lens.
|
SORRY - I've messed it up!! I have the "AUTO mamiya / sekor ES 1:1.4 f=55mm", as written on the front ring. The one for the Auto XTL / Auto X1000 bayonet mount SLRs! It's a beautiful heavy beast (365 g without lens caps!):
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1925ls@sg
Joined: 18 Oct 2020
Posts: 1
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 2:42 am Post subject: CZJ Sonnar 13,5cm 1:4 Contax RF |
|
|
1925ls@sg wrote:
Hi, a new member here. I bought this one about a month ago, finally got some time to clean the focus helicord and aperture ring, the glass is clean, and online databases pointed to a 1937 ~ 38 build. What I find strange about the lens is that all the images on the web of CZJ Sonnar 13,5/4 have the serial numbers as "Nr", instead of "No" like this one. And, in the 2nd picture, the aperture markings (4 ~ 22) have an opposite orientation. The only one I found that has the similar "No" and aperture markings is a picture of an Rodenstock Eurynar 4.5/13.5cm. Could this be a fake Sonnar?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jessebear
Joined: 25 Aug 2020
Posts: 21
Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
jessebear wrote:
I stumbled into manual lenses after coming from the world of telescopes. Autofocus is useless there so manual lenses seemed right for me after picking up a DSLR.
I went a bit off the deep end and have picked up the following in the last few months:
Super Takumar 50mm 1.4
Super Takumar 135mm 3.5
Jupiter 37A MC
Helios 44-3 MC
Helios 44 (13 bladed version)
Industar 50 (Red 'P')
Mir 1V
Jupiter 21M (still on its way)
Everything that's arrived so far has needed some kind of repair work or at least cleaning. I've built refractor and reflector telescopes but I've had a lot to learn about lenses. Everything is so tiny! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6008
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 4:25 am Post subject: Re: CZJ Sonnar 13,5cm 1:4 Contax RF |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| 1925ls@sg wrote: |
Hi, a new member here. I bought this one about a month ago, finally got some time to clean the focus helicord and aperture ring, the glass is clean, and online databases pointed to a 1937 ~ 38 build. What I find strange about the lens is that all the images on the web of CZJ Sonnar 13,5/4 have the serial numbers as "Nr", instead of "No" like this one. And, in the 2nd picture, the aperture markings (4 ~ 22) have an opposite orientation. The only one I found that has the similar "No" and aperture markings is a picture of an Rodenstock Eurynar 4.5/13.5cm. Could this be a fake Sonnar?
 |
This might help
T |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7553
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 4:30 am Post subject: Re: CZJ Sonnar 13,5cm 1:4 Contax RF |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| 1925ls@sg wrote: |
| Hi, a new member here. I bought this one about a month ago, finally got some time to clean the focus helicord and aperture ring, the glass is clean, and online databases pointed to a 1937 ~ 38 build. What I find strange about the lens is that all the images on the web of CZJ Sonnar 13,5/4 have the serial numbers as "Nr", instead of "No" like this one. And, in the 2nd picture, the aperture markings (4 ~ 22) have an opposite orientation. The only one I found that has the similar "No" and aperture markings is a picture of an Rodenstock Eurynar 4.5/13.5cm. Could this be a fake Sonnar? |
Looks like a fake one.
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 2921
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
A Zuiko auto-T MC 100mm f/2.8. A brilliant lens really. It has the size of an average 50mm lens, so it's ideal for travel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phalbert
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 359
Location: Namibia
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phalbert wrote:
I got this Tokina 70 - 150 F 3,8 one touch zoom. Aperture is 6 blades, min focus is about 1,4 m. The condition of the lens is like new and this is why I bought it. I already have the Zuiko 75 - 150 F 4 and the Vivitar 70 - 150 F 3,8.
In short, this lens is useless. Nothing is sharp until F 8 and then only the center. Corners and edges are annugly blur even on APS-C. Just bad. I suspect the previous owner must have made the same experience and didn't use it until the sale. I picked it very cheap in a pawn shop and didn't test it. I've seen similar lenses branded Vivitar with generally good reviews. So I'm wondering if my copy has a specific problem or if someone else had the same experience.
By the way, the Zuiko is the one to have. Sharp all over, and much better WO than the Vivitar 2 touch. Only min focus is obviously much better with the Viv. Thanks for reading.
[img]
_________________
🙋 My wishlist: Titan or Idaho 135/1,8 Nikon Df Nikkor 105/1,8 35/1,4 85/1,4
My dream lenses: Zuiko 180/2 Prototype Zuiko 85/1,4
Zeiss CY: 55/1,2 85/1,2
Astro Berlin 250/2 Canon EF 50/1,0 85/1,2
Nikkor 105/1,4 28/1,4
My stolen stuff: Zuiko 24/2 #106874; Zuiko 35-80/2,8 #102180; Zuiko 35/2 #119168; Zuiko 90/2 macro #102858; Zuiko x1,4 converter #102019; Tamron 17/3,5 #400567; Tamron 400/4 #80407; Soligor 135/2 #17506600 Sigma 28/1,8 #1001124 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| Phalbert wrote: |
I got this Tokina 70 - 150 F 3,8 one touch zoom. Aperture is 6 blades, min focus is about 1,4 m. The condition of the lens is like new and this is why I bought it. I already have the Zuiko 75 - 150 F 4 and the Vivitar 70 - 150 F 3,8.
...
By the way, the Zuiko is the one to have. Sharp all over, and much better WO than the Vivitar 2 touch. |
Strange - I have two samples of the Oly Zuiko 75-150mm, and both are abysmal (on 24 MP FF). Which camera are you using?
Stephan
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015
Posts: 1658
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Today I have purchased a Zuiko 38/1,8 and (one more time) a summicron R 50/2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
| Phalbert wrote: |
I got this Tokina 70 - 150 F 3,8 one touch zoom. Aperture is 6 blades, min focus is about 1,4 m. The condition of the lens is like new and this is why I bought it. I already have the Zuiko 75 - 150 F 4 and the Vivitar 70 - 150 F 3,8.
In short, this lens is useless. Nothing is sharp until F 8 and then only the center. Corners and edges are annugly blur even on APS-C. Just bad. I suspect the previous owner must have made the same experience and didn't use it until the sale. I picked it very cheap in a pawn shop and didn't test it. I've seen similar lenses branded Vivitar with generally good reviews. So I'm wondering if my copy has a specific problem or if someone else had the same experience.
By the way, the Zuiko is the one to have. Sharp all over, and much better WO than the Vivitar 2 touch. Only min focus is obviously much better with the Viv. Thanks for reading.
[img] |
Interesting. I didn't know this version. Thought there was only the 75-150mm which is more compact and focusses closer. http://allphotolenses.com/lenses/item/c_2647.html#prettyPhoto
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phalbert
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 359
Location: Namibia
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Phalbert wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
| Phalbert wrote: |
I got this Tokina 70 - 150 F 3,8 one touch zoom. Aperture is 6 blades, min focus is about 1,4 m. The condition of the lens is like new and this is why I bought it. I already have the Zuiko 75 - 150 F 4 and the Vivitar 70 - 150 F 3,8.
...
By the way, the Zuiko is the one to have. Sharp all over, and much better WO than the Vivitar 2 touch. |
Strange - I have two samples of the Oly Zuiko 75-150mm, and both are abysmal (on 24 MP FF). Which camera are you using?
Stephan |
Canon 600D / Rebel T3i, Film is completely dead in our country 😕😕😕.
My zuiko is indeed sharp all over and the tokina is terrible. If I read reviews of the tokina I'm pretty sure mine has a problem, which is a pity given its pristine condition. The zuiko is as good WO as the 135/3,5 which I also have.
_________________
🙋 My wishlist: Titan or Idaho 135/1,8 Nikon Df Nikkor 105/1,8 35/1,4 85/1,4
My dream lenses: Zuiko 180/2 Prototype Zuiko 85/1,4
Zeiss CY: 55/1,2 85/1,2
Astro Berlin 250/2 Canon EF 50/1,0 85/1,2
Nikkor 105/1,4 28/1,4
My stolen stuff: Zuiko 24/2 #106874; Zuiko 35-80/2,8 #102180; Zuiko 35/2 #119168; Zuiko 90/2 macro #102858; Zuiko x1,4 converter #102019; Tamron 17/3,5 #400567; Tamron 400/4 #80407; Soligor 135/2 #17506600 Sigma 28/1,8 #1001124 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015
Posts: 1658
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
I had the vivitar (tokina made and Kiron made). Both good lenses. Also the konica (tokina made) is good too.
But the best I had was the Canon nFd.
Sharp from wide open and in both extreme. At 150 mm the rendering is very good without CA.
I had not the Minolta MDIII, another winner. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| Phalbert wrote: |
| stevemark wrote: |
| Phalbert wrote: |
By the way, the Zuiko is the one to have. Sharp all over, and much better WO than the Vivitar 2 touch. |
Strange - I have two samples of the Oly Zuiko 75-150mm, and both are abysmal (on 24 MP FF). Which camera are you using?
Stephan |
Canon 600D / Rebel T3i, Film is completely dead in our country 😕😕😕.
My zuiko is indeed sharp all over and the tokina is terrible. If I read reviews of the tokina I'm pretty sure mine has a problem, which is a pity given its pristine condition. The zuiko is as good WO as the 135/3,5 which I also have. |
Ah Ok, that explains it! I'm using only FF cameras, and the Zuiko has really bad borders/corners on full frame, especially when comparing it to the best vintage zoom lenses in the 75-150mm range (e. g. Canon nFD, and Minolta MD-III). Thanks for the clarification!
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018
Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Nikon H.-C. 50mm f/2 and -S. 35mm/2.8 non AI version. Package unopened...
I guess 35mm/2.8 AI has a better design. I'll see how this non-AI version performs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
For less than the tax limit from Japan. Good looking but it probably needs an internal cleaning. A lot of dust inside. It came in a case with a lot of volcanic ashes or maybe someone's deceased in it.... Can't imagine why you would ship a lens in such a dirty container. The lens was covered in dust, which it was not on the seller pics. SMC Pentax-M 150mm 1:3.5
 SMC Pentax-M 150mm 1:3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 SMC Pentax-M 150mm 1:3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2020 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Still can't let cheap glass be. Especially weird focal lengths The Soligor 45-150mm 1:3.5 C/D (Made by Tokina)
 Soligor 45-150mm 1:3.5 C/D by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Soligor 45-150mm 1:3.5 C/D by The lens profile, on Flickr
It feels well built but I am betting it is not as good as the SMC Pentax 45-125 F4. Macro mode between 45 and 100mm (pull zoomring down at 45mm) Glossy finish is a terrible combo for greasy fingers :p
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phalbert
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 359
Location: Namibia
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phalbert wrote:
Tip: wash hands often... ;-) I like the lens and I wonder about the hood. Looks like made for a 20 or 24mm, vivitar 19mm ? Must be quite rare...
_________________
🙋 My wishlist: Titan or Idaho 135/1,8 Nikon Df Nikkor 105/1,8 35/1,4 85/1,4
My dream lenses: Zuiko 180/2 Prototype Zuiko 85/1,4
Zeiss CY: 55/1,2 85/1,2
Astro Berlin 250/2 Canon EF 50/1,0 85/1,2
Nikkor 105/1,4 28/1,4
My stolen stuff: Zuiko 24/2 #106874; Zuiko 35-80/2,8 #102180; Zuiko 35/2 #119168; Zuiko 90/2 macro #102858; Zuiko x1,4 converter #102019; Tamron 17/3,5 #400567; Tamron 400/4 #80407; Soligor 135/2 #17506600 Sigma 28/1,8 #1001124 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
| Phalbert wrote: |
Tip: wash hands often...  I like the lens and I wonder about the hood. Looks like made for a 20 or 24mm, vivitar 19mm ? Must be quite rare... |
Can't really find a lens it should be married to. The only candidate with a 67mm filter thread is the Series 1 24-70mm 3.8-4.8 but it seems to short for that. I'm sure the Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm (v1) Hood I have will do better on this lens.
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10531
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| D1N0 wrote: |
| Phalbert wrote: |
| Tip: wash hands often... I like the lens and I wonder about the hood. Looks like made for a 20 or 24mm, vivitar 19mm ? Must be quite rare... |
Can't really find a lens it should be married to. The only candidate with a 67mm filter thread is the Series 1 24-70mm 3.8-4.8 but it seems to short for that. I'm sure the Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm (v1) Hood I have will do better on this lens. |
Marry hood to Super-Takumar 1:2/35 (Model I)
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2491
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
| D1N0 wrote: |
| Phalbert wrote: |
| Tip: wash hands often... I like the lens and I wonder about the hood. Looks like made for a 20 or 24mm, vivitar 19mm ? Must be quite rare... |
Can't really find a lens it should be married to. The only candidate with a 67mm filter thread is the Series 1 24-70mm 3.8-4.8 but it seems to short for that. I'm sure the Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm (v1) Hood I have will do better on this lens. |
Marry hood to Super-Takumar 1:2/35 (Model I) |
If I would have that one :p It will fit my Pentax-A 35-105 F3.5
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16541
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Old STEINHEIL Cassaron 40mm
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015
Posts: 1658
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
| vivaldibow wrote: |
| ......I don't own either Mamiya versions (the non SX and SX). I guess the two Mamiya's are different, are they? |
No. They are the same. All the 55/1,4 Mamiya lenses are optically the same lens. 7/5 scheme.
supposedly made by Cosina (not by Tomioka like the Rikenon)
I had the chorme 55/1,4 TL v.1 and the SX version v.2 (the last is with me now, and are the same lenses, only coated differences) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
