View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
1939 (or possibly 1935) Schneider-Kreuznach Karat-Xenar 2.8/5cm.
(No cameras were harmed in the making of this post). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 760 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Sciolist wrote: |
(No cameras were harmed in the making of this post). |
That's an interesting lens. How does it shoot? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
KEO wrote: |
Sciolist wrote: |
(No cameras were harmed in the making of this post). |
That's an interesting lens. How does it shoot? |
I've not given it a try yet KEO. I'll post up once I have.
Cheers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2019 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
KEO wrote: |
That's an interesting lens. How does it shoot? |
Here you go KEO. f:9.5(ish). Fluted lens shade. Fuji X-E1 (APSC). Flat settings. No pp. Natural light from window to right.
1:1
I'll have to take it out for a good go, but it looks like it can take a picture. And I'll have to check I've got it all screwed to the camera correctly, as it looks like the focus plane may be skewed, or something - see edges of table.
PP - Contrast and sharpenening to taste.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 760 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Sciolist wrote: |
I'll have to take it out for a good go, but it looks like it can take a picture. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16541 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
_________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1552 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
Looks good with the PP! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
^^ Thanks folks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
1957 Voigtlander color-skopar 1:3.5/50.
My first front focusing adaptation. I'm currently mixing focus between front cell and helical to see if there's any difference I can perceive.
The whole shutter and lens assembly drops onto the front of the 'lens board'. Bellows (folded in camera in pic) rise up to meet it. All clamped in place with one nut from rear.
Looks like the body will require a general fettling. I noticed the bottom door arm is trying to grind its way through the shutter casing.
Wide open (f:3,5 APSC). Fuji X-E1. Flat settings, no pp. Natural light from window to right. Front cell at correct distance.
1:1 (f:3,5).
f:11 (Sharpest)
1:1 (f:11).
PP. f:11.
Last edited by Sciolist on Mon Sep 16, 2019 9:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
Sciolist wrote: |
1957 Voigtlander color-skopar 1:3.5/50. |
Nicely done! Looks pretty on Fuji XE1. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 760 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Sciolist wrote: |
1957 Voigtlander color-skopar 1:3.5/50. |
Nice one!
Where did you get the leather case for your Fuji? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
KEO wrote: |
Nice one!
Where did you get the leather case for your Fuji? |
Thanks. The case is a Fujifilm X half leather case for X-E1 bought with the camera. I think they were £70 when the XE1 was new, but I see there's a Fuji dealer on e:bay (UK unfortunately) trying to shift some for £12.99. It has a nice stiff base with door for access to battery and card. Nothing for access for the connectors though.
Last edited by Sciolist on Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:46 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
vivaldibow wrote: |
Sciolist wrote: |
1957 Voigtlander color-skopar 1:3.5/50. |
Nicely done! Looks pretty on Fuji XE1. |
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
Latest lens just came today.
Minolta MD Celtic 35mm f2.8.
Second version.
5/5 ,49mm filter thread ,165 grams,
and Conical aperture ring.
This is the Celtic version of the MDii Minolta MD W Rokkor 35mm f2.8 lens.
I have been chasing this lens for a very long time.
I finally found a very nice copy with perfect optics and original caps.
This was over my normal lens budget, and the most I've ever paid for a Celtic lens. $25 plus $8 Priority mail shipping.
Really looking foward to shooting with this lens. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
Гелиос-44 №0078364 КМЗ М39
Гелиос-44 №0078364 КМЗ М39 by Mr TTT, on Flickr
first shot
DSC01563 by Mr TTT, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 760 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
sergtum wrote: |
Гелиос-44 №0078364 КМЗ М39 |
Nice. I've got one similar to yours, and I like it a lot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6008 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
This one.
A Tomioka design if not build.
Auto Revuenon 55mm f1.4
T
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2491
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
We can't have this topic disappearing to page 2 :p
Arrived:
this was the sellers image...
Mine is a QZ-150m two touch. This one another single touch model... I bought it for the adaptall mount, so I don't really care. It seems to be a lens that was never used or sold. So old stock.
And also this one arrived in the same box. Described as with marks on the rear element, which are actually on the mirror... Not very visible here. Look like fungus spots to me.
_________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rybolt
Joined: 13 Sep 2016 Posts: 94 Location: Yellow Springs, Ohio USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rybolt wrote:
5cm f3.5 Zeiss Tessar Collapsible in Contax RF mount pot war version. Some people claim it's the best 50mm lens that Zeiss made for the contax cameras
#1
_________________ Fuji X and Sony A cameras with many Fuji, Zeiss, Leica and other adapted lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 760 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Very nice.
I've been enjoying this for a few days:
It's got a strange aperture pre-set system. There's a button on the pre-set ring. You push the button to unlock it, and when you let it go the ring will snap to and lock at the nearest f-stop.
It's very light and easy to shoot with, and I like the IQ a lot so far. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ernst Dinkla
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 378
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ernst Dinkla wrote:
Sciolist wrote: |
1957 Voigtlander color-skopar 1:3.5/50.
My first front focusing adaptation. I'm currently mixing focus between front cell and helical to see if there's any difference I can perceive.
The whole shutter and lens assembly drops onto the front of the 'lens board'. Bellows (folded in camera in pic) rise up to meet it. All clamped in place with one nut from rear.
Looks like the body will require a general fettling. I noticed the bottom door arm is trying to grind its way through the shutter casing.
Wide open (f:3,5 APSC). Fuji X-E1. Flat settings, no pp. Natural light from window to right. Front cell at correct distance.
] |
Are you sure the Color Skopar has front cell focusing? The Color Skopar 50mm 2.8 that I took from a Vito BL is actually unit focusing. That the front turns in focusing and everything is small confused me till I removed it and saw the total lens move when focused. If it is front cell focusing then 40x the focal length so 20 meter / 66 feet should be the optimal setting for the front cell when focused by a separate helicoid. The optical design compromised on that distance.
Image quality of my 2.8 can still amaze me. https://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=1117739&View=NewFirst&Rows=4 _________________ Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst
http://www.pigment-print.com/spectralplots/spectrumviz_1.htm
March 2017 update, 750+ inkjet media white spectral plots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
KEO wrote: |
Very nice.
I've been enjoying this for a few days:
|
great choice!
I've been looking at it and counting the missing cents to buy it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
Ernst Dinkla wrote: |
Are you sure the Color Skopar has front cell focusing? The Color Skopar 50mm 2.8 that I took from a Vito BL is actually unit focusing. That the front turns in focusing and everything is small confused me till I removed it and saw the total lens move when focused. If it is front cell focusing then 40x the focal length so 20 meter / 66 feet should be the optimal setting for the front cell when focused by a separate helicoid. The optical design compromised on that distance.
Image quality of my 2.8 can still amaze me. https://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=1117739&View=NewFirst&Rows=4 |
Hi Ernst. Yes, I've just checked again to make sure and it is front cell focusing. The lens fits the Vito IIa folder. Thanks for providing the calculation. I'd concluded that infinity was better than mfd, and better than setting it somewhere in the middle, but that is as far as I had got. Now I can set it to 66' .
Do you know if the 40x calculation can be applied to any front cell focusing lens? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3437 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Olympus OM Zuiko 85mm 2.0, with a beautiful OM-1 (working, even with a still good PX625 for the lightmeter!),
Steinheil Cintar 100mm 4.5 for Argus and a
dirty Trioplan 100mm 2.8 (Exakta mount). Some cleaning and it is OK!
In the same lot a perfect Leitz Colorplan CF 90mm 2.5 and a not working Zenit E with nice Helios 44-2.
Nice catch! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 760 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
sergtum wrote: |
KEO wrote: |
Very nice.
I've been enjoying this for a few days:
|
great choice!
I've been looking at it and counting the missing cents to buy it. |
I'm obsessed with 135s!
If you get one, you'll like it. It's very pleasant to use. It works great for macro shots too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|