| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:43 pm Post subject: Industar-22 (red P) 50/3.5 collapsible + Ricoh GXR |
 |
|
serkol wrote:
Soviet copy Leitz Elmar 50/3.5 collapsible - Industar-22 (red P) 50/3.5 collapsible + Ricoh GXR
Pictures similar, looks similar, but price is not similar 
[more]
Фотографии в альбоме «Индустар 22 50/3.5 "П"», автор serkol64 на Яндекс.Фотках
_________________
Regards,
Sergey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 3678
Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
_________________
Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 1998
Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
Nice exemple of what those tiny cheap lenses can do .
_________________
Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
Thanks guys! These are my photos two years ago ...
House Van Gogh
Фотографии в альбоме «Индустар 22 50/3.5 "П"», автор serkol64 на Яндекс.Фотках
_________________
Regards,
Sergey |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2015 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
Фотографии в альбоме «Индустар 22 50/3.5 "П"», автор serkol64 на Яндекс.Фотках
_________________
Regards,
Sergey |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2015 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 3168
Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2015 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Great photos! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2015 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
Attila, stingOM thank you!
Reflexion...
Фотографии в альбоме «Индустар 22 50/3.5 "П"», автор serkol64 на Яндекс.Фотках
_________________
Regards,
Sergey |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
Another copy Industar-22 50mm 3.5 KMZ, from 1954 year
 _0019615_1920px by serkol64, on Flickr
 _0019603_1920px by serkol64, on Flickr
_________________
Regards,
Sergey |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3072
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2021 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
uddhava, thanks!
 _0019600_1920px by serkol64, on Flickr
_________________
Regards,
Sergey |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 834
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
Nice!
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
lumens pixel, thank you!
 _0019602_1920px by serkol64, on Flickr
_________________
Regards,
Sergey |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9097
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I used to own a Leitz 50/3.5 Elmar and have occasionally regretted selling it. It was one of the sharpest lenses I'd ever owned. I've thought about buying an Industar clone because it's much cheaper than the 50/3.5 Elmar, but I wonder about the Industar's sharpness. The photos I see are certainly great, but it's hard to tell a lens's sharpness from images posted in a forum.
So this question is for those of you have have used both: is the Industar comparable in terms of sharpness to the 50/3.5 Elmar?
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
| cooltouch wrote: |
So this question is for those of you have have used both: is the Industar comparable in terms of sharpness to the 50/3.5 Elmar? |
Unfortunately I have never owned an Elmar 50/3.5 to compare, although I really want to. Elmar is better, Industar is cheaper. I guess so...
_________________
Regards,
Sergey |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 3678
Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
| cooltouch wrote: |
I used to own a Leitz 50/3.5 Elmar and have occasionally regretted selling it. It was one of the sharpest lenses I'd ever owned. I've thought about buying an Industar clone because it's much cheaper than the 50/3.5 Elmar, but I wonder about the Industar's sharpness. The photos I see are certainly great, but it's hard to tell a lens's sharpness from images posted in a forum.
So this question is for those of you have have used both: is the Industar comparable in terms of sharpness to the 50/3.5 Elmar? |
Sorry, as I have already the better Summicron I've never tried the Elmar. However, the Industar is really a capable lens and can be found for apprx. $ 40 in good shape. The Elmar still goes for $ 400 (at least).
Just buy the industar and try it yourself, most probably you will be able to sell it again without losses if it doesn't fulfill your expectations.
My introduction of the Industar can be seen here: http://forum.mflenses.com/kmz-industar-22-50mm-f3-5-rigit-white-m39-ltm-t72542.html
_________________
Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
