| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Teo
Joined: 19 Jul 2014
Posts: 1079
Location: Romania
|
 Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 7:19 pm Post subject: I need image stabilisation on nex... |
 |
|
Teo wrote:
...It's about my nex3...Sometimes I need stabilisation on it .I use it only with manual lenses ,I have some faster lenses ( 24/2,8 ,28/2 35/2 40/1,8 50/1,4 55/1,6 85/1, for some situations ( most of them).
But for some indoor low light where tripod isn't allowed I feel that I would benefit more from more depth of field ( rather slower lenses,f4-5,6)and image stabilisation.What should I choose for a reasonable price and good image quality? AF , of course?
In fact , if my Oly would give me the good 3200 as my nex 3 I wouldn't bother.
_________________
Cheers ,Teo
( former yinyangbt )
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189381640@N08/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/44698004@N02/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012
Posts: 1364
Location: Slovenia
|
| Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
Sony A7 MkII has image stabilization and is full frame and you get to use all your existing lenses. Win-win-win. 
Or you could wait a month or so for the rumoured A6xxx which will be cheaper and APS-C.
_________________
my flickr stream |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Teo
Joined: 19 Jul 2014
Posts: 1079
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Teo wrote:
| miran wrote: |
Sony A7 MkII has image stabilization and is full frame and you get to use all your existing lenses. Win-win-win.
Or you could wait a month or so for the rumoured A6xxx which will be cheaper and APS-C. |
Hello, Miran !
Tempting camera , didn't knew it has IBIS ,a very useful feature Minolta heritage that Sony should never dumped .I am glad they changed their mind , but the price is over my money.
_________________
Cheers ,Teo
( former yinyangbt )
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189381640@N08/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/44698004@N02/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Teo
Joined: 19 Jul 2014
Posts: 1079
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Teo wrote:
I was thinking more about a oss lens ...
Meanwhile ,from what I read it seems that for not-so-much money the 18-55 oss is better than the compact 16-50 oss to complement my nex 3. Judging after the lab results .
_________________
Cheers ,Teo
( former yinyangbt )
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189381640@N08/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/44698004@N02/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012
Posts: 1364
Location: Slovenia
|
| Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
The 18-55 is the old kit lens, predecessor of 16-50. I have it and it's a typical kit lens. It's also quite big.
_________________
my flickr stream |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6624
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Buy a Fuji X-E2 with 18-55/2.8-4 OIS instead 
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
