View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
vroger
Joined: 23 Jul 2014 Posts: 623 Location: MN
Expire: 2016-10-21
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 12:54 am Post subject: carl zeiss luminar 63mm f4.5 mount |
|
|
vroger wrote:
Is the carl zeiss luminar 63mm f4.5 any good?
What mount is a carl zeiss luminar 63mm f4.5? any way to adapt it to eos-m?
I'm bidding on one on ebay. _________________ Roger Lund
Canon EOS-M, Fuji X-E2, Helois 44-0 Vintage, Helois 44-4, Canon FD 50mm 1.8, Jupiter 8 50mm F2, Jupiter 3 50mm F1.5, Canon Serenar 50mm 1.9, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM, Canon Serenar 85mm F2, Leica 50mm f2 summar, E.Ludwig 50mm F2.9, Rekagon will.wetzlar 50mm 2.8,, a.schacht ulm travenar 135mm F3.5, CZJ 29mm 2.8 Hoya 28mm 2.8, CZ Tessar 50mm 2.8, MIR 37mm. 2.8, Porst Color Reflex MC 50mm 1.7, Vivitar 28mm 2.8 mc cf
http://photography.rogerlund.net
For sale: Canon EOS-M and MF Adapters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014 Posts: 617 Location: Troy, MI USA
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
newst wrote:
Roger,
I don't know a damned thing about the Luminar but if these samples off the web are any indication I would say it is worth bidding on.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/johnhallmen/3990029525
https://www.tumblr.com/search/carl%20zeiss%20luminar%2063mm%20f4.5
Steve _________________ Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bernhardas
Joined: 01 Jan 2013 Posts: 1437
Expire: 2017-05-23
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
bernhardas wrote:
edited
Last edited by bernhardas on Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:43 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vroger
Joined: 23 Jul 2014 Posts: 623 Location: MN
Expire: 2016-10-21
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
vroger wrote:
bernhardas wrote: |
The luminars are specialized micro lenses. For 3x to 30x enlargement. They were originally planned to be used in a special micro device ( the one for the contarex was called tessovar). You will need a bellows that fits your camera, and an adapter from the screw mount lens to the bellows. |
Is it RMS? Like this adapter? http://rafcamera.com/en/adapter-rms-to-canon-eos-m
How do I find the/a correct bellows? _________________ Roger Lund
Canon EOS-M, Fuji X-E2, Helois 44-0 Vintage, Helois 44-4, Canon FD 50mm 1.8, Jupiter 8 50mm F2, Jupiter 3 50mm F1.5, Canon Serenar 50mm 1.9, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM, Canon Serenar 85mm F2, Leica 50mm f2 summar, E.Ludwig 50mm F2.9, Rekagon will.wetzlar 50mm 2.8,, a.schacht ulm travenar 135mm F3.5, CZJ 29mm 2.8 Hoya 28mm 2.8, CZ Tessar 50mm 2.8, MIR 37mm. 2.8, Porst Color Reflex MC 50mm 1.7, Vivitar 28mm 2.8 mc cf
http://photography.rogerlund.net
For sale: Canon EOS-M and MF Adapters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
There are similar accessories and lenses available from Olympus, Nikon and also from Minolta. Those "specialists" are rather rare and relatively expensive. Real microscope lenses for larger magnification are available almost for free. Even from the "famous" German manufacturers.
It is somehow in the middle between normal bellows macro and rather extreme microscope photography.
However, I strongly recommend to gain some experience with macro photography first before stepping deeper into this category. It is not that easy to produce good results just with a lens like this. Special light equipment is also strongly recommended and a tilt/shift bellows is the best tool in between such a lens and the camera to control the very shallow depth of view for good results.
I doubt that it would be possible just with an adapter lens combination on any camera to get really good results without proper accessories. It's rather tricky to do it right, although the digital photography made it much more easier today. However, to play around with such lenses for just a few bucks wouldn't be a failure on the other hand, if you get it for very little money. A reversed lens on a bellows could possibly be the better start. So from my point of view the accessory is more important than any lens used. Any standard lens (which you already have) reverted results in a rather good macro lens and a reverse ring doesn't cost more than a glass of beer.
The main question is always what you want to achieve. If that is clear then you should try to get the best equipment for that.
However, it's a rather cumbersome process also nowadays to produce a really good and sharp picture of e.g. a complete tiny insect with such a lens. That should be clear beforehand to avoid frustrations afterwards.
Just my 2 cents. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here).
Last edited by tb_a on Wed May 13, 2015 3:48 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vroger
Joined: 23 Jul 2014 Posts: 623 Location: MN
Expire: 2016-10-21
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
vroger wrote:
tb_a wrote: |
There are similar accessories and lenses available from Olympus, Nikon and also from Minolta. Those "specialists" are rather rare and relatively expensive. Real microscope lenses for larger magnification are available almost for free. Even from the "famous" German manufacturers.
It is somehow in the middle between normal bellows macro and rather extreme microscope photography.
However, I strongly recommend to gain some experience with macro photography first before stepping deeper into this category. It is not that easy to produce good results just with a lens like this. Special light equipment is also strongly recommended and a tilt/shift bellows is the best tool in between such a lens and the camera to control the very shallow depth of view for good results.
I doubt that it would be possible just with an adapter lens combination on any camera to get really good results without proper accessories. It's rather tricky to do it right, although the digital photography made it much more easier today. However, to play around with such lenses for just a few bucks wouldn't be a failure on the other hand, if you get it for very little money. A reversed lens on a bellows could possibly the better start. So from my point of view the accessory is more important than any lens used. Any standard lens (which you already have) reverted results in a rather good macro lens and a reverse ring doesn't cost more than a glass of beer.
The main question is always what you want to achieve. If that is clear then you should try to get the best equipment for that.
However, it's a rather cumbersome process also nowadays to produce a really good and sharp picture of e.g. a complete tiny insect with such a lens. That should be clear beforehand to avoid frustrations afterwards.
Just my 2 cents. |
Understood, I posted the link to the sale in the MFL club, as I agree I bid before I knew what it was. Other than it was cheap, and normally sells for much much more than it's current listing. I'm not in it for money, thus anyone feel free to overbid my $40 max bid. _________________ Roger Lund
Canon EOS-M, Fuji X-E2, Helois 44-0 Vintage, Helois 44-4, Canon FD 50mm 1.8, Jupiter 8 50mm F2, Jupiter 3 50mm F1.5, Canon Serenar 50mm 1.9, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM, Canon Serenar 85mm F2, Leica 50mm f2 summar, E.Ludwig 50mm F2.9, Rekagon will.wetzlar 50mm 2.8,, a.schacht ulm travenar 135mm F3.5, CZJ 29mm 2.8 Hoya 28mm 2.8, CZ Tessar 50mm 2.8, MIR 37mm. 2.8, Porst Color Reflex MC 50mm 1.7, Vivitar 28mm 2.8 mc cf
http://photography.rogerlund.net
For sale: Canon EOS-M and MF Adapters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
vroger wrote: |
Understood, I posted the link to the sale in the MFL club, as I agree I bid before I knew what it was. Other than it was cheap, and normally sells for much much more than it's current listing. I'm not in it for money, thus anyone feel free to overbid my $40 max bid. |
Those lenses seem to be overpriced nowadays anyway. I've seen some of them listed for several hundred $.
Stunning results up to 3:1 (300% magnification on the film or sensor!!) can also be achieved by the reverse method or a combination of lenses and/or bellows. That means you can produce a large poster from a tiny fly for instance.
That's good enough for 99% of macro photography. These special lenses are more for scientific documentary purposes where higher magnification is required.
Therefore I would not even buy one for 40 $. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bernhardas
Joined: 01 Jan 2013 Posts: 1437
Expire: 2017-05-23
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
bernhardas wrote:
Edited
Last edited by bernhardas on Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:11 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16546 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Well, the Zeiss Luminars were the reason I started my site macroleses.de (and its predecessor) many years ago. you'll find all data there... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|