View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2913 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 2:33 am Post subject: Orbit 4x5 with Ektar 127 4.7 good price? |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
I found a local camera I am interested in its a monorail "Orbit" (Burke and James?) 4 x5 in very good shape save the view glass is broken. It comes with a couple of film holders and a film bag , also the box. They are asking 100 USD. I have been eyeing 4 x 5 and even bought a project camera but this seems close to what I would need to get started. Is that a good price? _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
A good price to get started with 4x5! _________________ my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
buerokratiehasser
Joined: 12 Jun 2011 Posts: 470
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
buerokratiehasser wrote:
Rockwell had some serious 4x5 pages with tips and I do believe he considers $300 cheap. (Note that film and costs will eat more)
So it sounds like a deal, but how will you focus without a ground glass? It's like, the USP of these bulky expensive cameras. Without it you basically have an unwieldy folder. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2913 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
I can replace the glass with the project camera glass I think. Otherwise maybe ebay for 20 to 30 usd. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
"save the view glass is broken."
This should be very easy to replace as you say, there are several groundglass vendors around.
And its not that hard to make your own.
If you don't want to buy a proper replacement groundglass you can use a sheet of acrylic plastic, sand one side with 800-grit sandpaper.
http://forum.mflenses.com/make-your-own-plastic-groundglass-t35782.html _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2913 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Thanks. The comment as regards the glass was more aimed at valuation, I am not worried about the replacement as I have a piece in a project camera that should work. Just trying to see if it is a pretty good deal. I definitely want to learn large format view photography, also I was dreaming of maybe buying a used digital back to see if I could make that work. Thoughts? _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
"They are asking 100 USD."
This is a very good price if everything is in reasonably good shape. A bargain. But -
Check the bellows for cracking and the shutter function, as well as the lens for scratches/fog.
These are where a lot of the value lies. Bad bellows means an expensive fix. Shutters can be fixed but unless you know what you are doing you will need to send it to a pro, and that can be costly. Lens fungus and internal fog can be cleaned without too much trouble on the Ektar, these are easy to disassemble, but too many fine scratches on the front element make the lens questionable. Contrast will suffer.
Also note that 127mm has barely any coverage on 4x5. It may not actually cover the film unless you have it at f/16 and you will have no movements.
The 127mm was popular on 4x5 press cameras at the time because they were usually used at small apertures with powerful flash bulbs, because they were a bit "wide" to easily capture a picture, and because it was usual to crop a lot to get the scene you wanted. The philosophy was to get everything in a shot and then publish just the interesting bits.
Also they depended mainly on scale focus and greater DOF. It was a 'snapshot' approach. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6006 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
As the others have already said - the price is good, especially if the bellows and lens are in working order.
The Ektar has a reputation for sharpness
Don't rush into digital with this. Get some film holders and some film and try your hand at B&W. B&W film is easily available and can be quite cheap. (Fomapan and Shanghai)
You may - like many of us - enjoy the hands on tactile and very rewarding experience of negative and print making the old way.
Have fun
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2913 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Thanks guys. Judging by the photos on CL it would appear to be in very fine condition but I reallize that sometimes just sitting unused the bellows can dry and shutters can seize. I have sent a request for contact. Unless it has some major unseen flaw I plan to go for it. As far as film I definitely plan to do some of that. I will let you know if I manage to snag it. I will likely be pumping you all for info _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
danfromm
Joined: 04 Sep 2011 Posts: 576
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
danfromm wrote:
As others have already said, reasonable price if in good order. If not in good order, pass on it.
Info here: http://www.cameraeccentric.com/html/info/bj_1.html
The camera is a copy of the 4x5 Kodak Master View. Very capable camera but limited extension (16") so not good for long lenses and bail type spring back that will accept only insertion type roll film holders. This means no relatively inexpensive Graflex brand roll holders for 4x5 cameras with Graflok/International backs. And minimum extension 3 5/8" so marginal (no movements possible) with 90 mm lenses, unusable with shorter lenses.
I don't mean to denigrate the 4x5 KMV and copies. Widely used very capable view cameras, but not modular so not as flexible as more modern designs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
buerokratiehasser
Joined: 12 Jun 2011 Posts: 470
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
buerokratiehasser wrote:
Sounds like a 6x7 or 6x9 back would be a nice accessory .. also sets you back 5 bucks per roll not per image :)
I have no experience with view cameras but people seem to pay well for the lens alone on bay. Seems to depend on the shutter it is in, however. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2913 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
danfromm wrote: |
As others have already said, reasonable price if in good order. If not in good order, pass on it.
Info here: http://www.cameraeccentric.com/html/info/bj_1.html
The camera is a copy of the 4x5 Kodak Master View. Very capable camera but limited extension (16") so not good for long lenses and bail type spring back that will accept only insertion type roll film holders. This means no relatively inexpensive Graflex brand roll holders for 4x5 cameras with Graflok/International backs. And minimum extension 3 5/8" so marginal (no movements possible) with 90 mm lenses, unusable with shorter lenses.
I don't mean to denigrate the 4x5 KMV and copies. Widely used very capable view cameras, but not modular so not as flexible as more modern designs. |
I had hoped to use it for landscape. Would that be OK?. I reallize it will have limitations for lots of other things. I am completely new to this stuff but would like to explore the perspective thing. From your comments it sounds as though it will only accept a narrow range of FL. 90 with no movements. Obviously 127. How much longer? I am an amateur and this is just hobby stuff for me so I can't really justify a couple grand for linhof system. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|